Control Motion Approach of a Lower Limb Orthosis to Reduce Energy Consumption

By analysing the dynamic principles of the human gait, an economic gait-control analysis is performed, and passive elements are included to increase the energy efficiency in the motion control of active orthoses. Traditional orthoses use position patterns from the clinical gait analyses (CGAs) of healthy people, which are then de-normalized and adjusted to each user. These orthoses maintain a very rigid gait, and their energy cost is very high, reducing the autonomy of the user. First, to take advantage of the inherent dynamics of the legs, a state machine pattern with different gains in each state is applied to reduce the actuator energy consumption. Next, different passive elements, such as springs and brakes in the joints, are analysed to further reduce energy consumption. After an off-line parameter optimization and a heuristic improvement with genetic algorithms, a reduction in energy consumption of 16.8% is obtained by applying a state machine control pattern, and a reduction of 18.9% is obtained by...

[1]  Andrew Valiente,et al.  Design of a Quasi-Passive Parallel Leg Exoskeleton to Augment Load Carrying for Walking , 2005 .

[2]  S. Collins,et al.  Recycling Energy to Restore Impaired Ankle Function during Human Walking , 2010, PloS one.

[3]  Hugh Herr,et al.  Exoskeletons and orthoses: classification, design challenges and future directions , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[4]  Arthur D Kuo,et al.  Energetics of actively powered locomotion using the simplest walking model. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[5]  R. Ham,et al.  Compliant actuator designs , 2009, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[6]  C. Charalambous.  The Major Determinants in Normal and Pathological Gait , 2014 .

[7]  Manoj Srinivasan,et al.  Fifteen observations on the structure of energy-minimizing gaits in many simple biped models , 2011, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[8]  L. Chèze,et al.  Adjustments to McConville et al. and Young et al. body segment inertial parameters. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  Rodger Kram,et al.  Simultaneous positive and negative external mechanical work in human walking. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Joel E. Chestnutt,et al.  The Actuator With Mechanically Adjustable Series Compliance , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[11]  Elena Garcia,et al.  TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THE JOINT SYNERGY FOR THE ACTUATION IN A LOWER-LIMB ACTIVE ORTHOSIS , 2012 .

[12]  M. Goldfarb,et al.  Preliminary Evaluation of a Powered Lower Limb Orthosis to Aid Walking in Paraplegic Individuals , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[13]  Juan Carlos Arevalo,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF THE ATLAS LOWER-LIMB ACTIVE ORTHOSIS , 2011 .

[14]  Emery N. Brown,et al.  Human Leg Model Predicts Ankle Muscle-Tendon Morphology, State, Roles and Energetics in Walking , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[15]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  Development of a compliance controller to reduce energy consumption for bipedal robots , 2008, Auton. Robots.

[16]  T. McMahon,et al.  Ballistic walking. , 1980, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  Joel E. Chestnutt,et al.  Design and Philosophy of the BiMASC, a Highly Dynamic Biped , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[18]  Tad McGeer,et al.  Passive Dynamic Walking , 1990, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[19]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  MACCEPA 2.0: Adjustable compliant actuator with stiffening characteristic for energy efficient hopping , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[20]  Martin Buss,et al.  Effects of compliant ankles on bipedal locomotion , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[21]  G. Cavagna,et al.  Mechanical work in terrestrial locomotion: two basic mechanisms for minimizing energy expenditure. , 1977, The American journal of physiology.

[22]  Reinhard Blickhan,et al.  Compliant leg behaviour explains basic dynamics of walking and running , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  C. T. Farley,et al.  Minimizing center of mass vertical movement increases metabolic cost in walking. , 2005, Journal of applied physiology.

[24]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  A novel actuator with adjustable stiffness (AwAS) , 2010, 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[25]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  MACCEPA, the mechanically adjustable compliance and controllable equilibrium position actuator: Design and implementation in a biped robot , 2007, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[26]  G. Hirzinger,et al.  A new variable stiffness design: Matching requirements of the next robot generation , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[27]  Arthur D. Kuo,et al.  Choosing Your Steps Carefully , 2007, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[28]  J Maxwell Donelan,et al.  Dynamic Principles of Gait and Their Clinical Implications , 2010, Physical Therapy.