Visual Display Height

We examined the influence of backrest inclination and vergence demand on the posture and gaze angle that workers adopt to view visual targets placed in different vertical locations. In the study, 12 participants viewed a small video monitor placed in 7 locations around a 0.65-m radius arc (from 65° below to 30° above horizontal eye height). Trunk posture was manipulated by changing the backrest inclination of an adjustable chair. Vergence demand was manipulated by using ophthalmic lenses and prisms to mimic the visual consequences of varying target distance. Changes in vertical target location caused large changes in atlanto-occipital posture and gaze angle. Cervical posture was altered to a lesser extent by changes in vertical target location. Participants compensated for changes in backrest inclination by changing cervical posture, though they did not significantly alter atlanto-occipital posture and gaze angle. The posture adopted to view any target represents a compromise between visual and musculoskeletal demands. These results provide support for the argument that the optimal location of visual targets is at least 15° below horizontal eye level. Actual or potential applications of this work include the layout of computer workstations and the viewing of displays from a seated posture.

[1]  K H Kroemer,et al.  Preferred line of sight angle. , 1986, Ergonomics.

[2]  D. Chaffin Localized muscle fatigue--definiton and measurement. , 1973, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.

[3]  M. P. J. M. Van Riel,et al.  Improving the sitting posture of CAD/CAM workers by increasing VDU monitor working height , 1992 .

[4]  S. Delp,et al.  Influence of Muscle Morphometry and Moment Arms on the Moment‐Generating Capacity of Human Neck Muscles , 1998, Spine.

[5]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  Vertical Gaze Direction and Postural Adjustment : An Extension of the Heuer Model , 2010 .

[6]  M. Hanson Contemporary ergonomics 1998 , 1998 .

[7]  C J Snijders,et al.  A biomechanical model for the analysis of the cervical spine in static postures. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  Shrawan Kumar A computer desk for bifocal lens wearers, with special emphasis on selected telecommunication tasks , 1994 .

[9]  W. Monroe Keyserling,et al.  Evaluating posture behavior during seated tasks , 1991 .

[10]  B Nilsson,et al.  Musculoskeletal disorders among visual display terminal workers: individual, ergonomic, and work organizational factors. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[11]  V K Goel,et al.  Moment-rotation relationships of the ligamentous occipito-atlanto-axial complex. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic,et al.  Simultaneous test procedures and the choice of a test statistic in MANOVA. , 1983 .

[13]  Robin Burgess-Limerick,et al.  The effect of vertical visual target location on head and neck posture , 1998 .

[14]  C. J. Huberty,et al.  Multivariate analysis versus multiple univariate analyses. , 1989 .

[15]  S G Hill,et al.  Preferred Declination of the Line of Sight , 1986, Human factors.

[16]  James R. Tresilian,et al.  Increasing confidence in vergence as a cue to distance , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  Jennie P. Psihogios,et al.  The effects of video display terminal height on the operator: a comparison of the 15° and 40° recommendations , 1998 .

[18]  J. Winters,et al.  Neck Muscle Activity and 3-D Head Kinematics During Quasi-Static and Dynamic Tracking Movements , 1990 .

[19]  James P. Duncanson,et al.  HUMAN FACTORS DESIGN GUIDE , 1996 .

[20]  R. Jampel,et al.  The primary position of the eyes, the resetting saccade, and the transverse visual head plane. Head movements around the cervical joints. , 1992, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[21]  M Mon-Williams,et al.  Gaze angle: a possible mechanism of visual stress in virtual reality headsets. , 1998, Ergonomics.

[22]  U O Bergqvist,et al.  Eye discomfort and work with visual display terminals. , 1994, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[23]  G. Németh,et al.  Load moments and myoelectric activity when the cervical spine is held in full flexion and extension. , 1986, Ergonomics.

[24]  R. Burgess-Limerick,et al.  The effect of imposed and self-selected computer monitor height on posture and gaze angle. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[25]  G. Németh,et al.  Effects of changes in sitting work posture on static neck and shoulder muscle activity. , 1986, Ergonomics.

[26]  Karl H.E. Kroemer,et al.  Ergonomics: How to Design for Ease and Efficiency , 1993 .

[27]  H Kylian,et al.  Preferred position of visual displays relative to the eyes: a field study of visual strain and individual differences. , 1998, Ergonomics.

[28]  Dennis R. Ankrum,et al.  Posture, Comfort, and Monitor Placement , 1995 .

[29]  M Brüwer,et al.  Preferred vertical gaze direction and observation distance. , 1991, Ergonomics.

[30]  Keir Fraser,et al.  The influence of computer monitor height on head and neck posture 1 Requests for reprints should be , 1999 .