ITS as an environmental DNA barcode for fungi: an in silico approach reveals potential PCR biases

BackgroundDuring the last 15 years the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) of nuclear DNA has been used as a target for analyzing fungal diversity in environmental samples, and has recently been selected as the standard marker for fungal DNA barcoding. In this study we explored the potential amplification biases that various commonly utilized ITS primers might introduce during amplification of different parts of the ITS region in samples containing mixed templates ('environmental barcoding'). We performed in silico PCR analyses with commonly used primer combinations using various ITS datasets obtained from public databases as templates.ResultsSome of the ITS primers, such as ITS1-F, were hampered with a high proportion of mismatches relative to the target sequences, and most of them appeared to introduce taxonomic biases during PCR. Some primers, e.g. ITS1-F, ITS1 and ITS5, were biased towards amplification of basidiomycetes, whereas others, e.g. ITS2, ITS3 and ITS4, were biased towards ascomycetes. The assumed basidiomycete-specific primer ITS4-B only amplified a minor proportion of basidiomycete ITS sequences, even under relaxed PCR conditions. Due to systematic length differences in the ITS2 region as well as the entire ITS, we found that ascomycetes will more easily amplify than basidiomycetes using these regions as targets. This bias can be avoided by using primers amplifying ITS1 only, but this would imply preferential amplification of 'non-dikarya' fungi.ConclusionsWe conclude that ITS primers have to be selected carefully, especially when used for high-throughput sequencing of environmental samples. We suggest that different primer combinations or different parts of the ITS region should be analyzed in parallel, or that alternative ITS primers should be searched for.

[1]  P. Choler,et al.  Assessment of Microbial Communities by Graph Partitioning in a Study of Soil Fungi in Two Alpine Meadows , 2009, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[2]  D. Harris,et al.  Can you bank on GenBank , 2003 .

[3]  T. White Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics , 1990 .

[4]  Erik Kristiansson,et al.  The ITS region as a target for characterization of fungal communities using emerging sequencing technologies. , 2009, FEMS microbiology letters.

[5]  T. Szaro,et al.  Spatial distribution of fungal communities in a coastal grassland soil , 2009 .

[6]  R. Vilgalys,et al.  Organization of ribosomal DNA in the basidiomycete Thanatephorus praticola , 1990, Current Genetics.

[7]  J. SantaLucia,et al.  The thermodynamics of DNA structural motifs. , 2004, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[8]  Paul T Rygiewicz,et al.  Fungal-specific PCR primers developed for analysis of the ITS region of environmental DNA extracts , 2005, BMC Microbiology.

[9]  K. Seifert Progress towards DNA barcoding of fungi , 2009, Molecular ecology resources.

[10]  Andrew P. Martin,et al.  Evidence that chytrids dominate fungal communities in high-elevation soils , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  J. Bunge,et al.  Polymerase chain reaction primers miss half of rRNA microbial diversity , 2009, The ISME Journal.

[12]  Rytas Vilgalys,et al.  Fungal Community Analysis by Large-Scale Sequencing of Environmental Samples , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[13]  Thomas J. White,et al.  PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. , 1990 .

[14]  Ion I. Măndoiu,et al.  PrimerHunter: a primer design tool for PCR-based virus subtype identification , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[15]  J. Cairney,et al.  Diversity and ecology of soil fungal communities: increased understanding through the application of molecular techniques. , 2004, Environmental microbiology.

[16]  T. Kuyper,et al.  Molecular Identification of Ectomycorrhizal Mycelium in Soil Horizons , 2003, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[17]  E. Boa,et al.  Ainsworth and Bisby's Dictionary of the Fungi , 1998 .

[18]  J. Lennon,et al.  Spatial and temporal ecology of Scots pine ectomycorrhizas. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[19]  F. Chen,et al.  Experimental factors affecting PCR-based estimates of microbial species richness and evenness , 2010, The ISME Journal.

[20]  U. Pöschl,et al.  High diversity of fungi in air particulate matter , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Susan M. Huse,et al.  Effect of PCR amplicon size on assessments of clone library microbial diversity and community structure. , 2009, Environmental microbiology.

[22]  R. Henrik Nilsson,et al.  Taxonomic Reliability of DNA Sequences in Public Sequence Databases: A Fungal Perspective , 2006, PloS one.

[23]  A. Jumpponen,et al.  Massively parallel 454‐sequencing of fungal communities in Quercus spp. ectomycorrhizas indicates seasonal dynamics in urban and rural sites , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[24]  Joost A. Stalpers,et al.  Ainsworth and Bisby's dictionary of the fungi: 9th edition. , 1995 .

[25]  J. Bunge,et al.  Environmental rRNA inventories miss over half of protistan diversity , 2008, BMC Microbiology.

[26]  K. Jones,et al.  Massively parallel 454 sequencing indicates hyperdiverse fungal communities in temperate Quercus macrocarpa phyllosphere. , 2009, The New phytologist.

[27]  David L. Hawksworth,et al.  Ainsworth and Bisby's Dictionary of the fungi. Seventh Edition. , 1997 .

[28]  S. Trumbore,et al.  Spatial separation of litter decomposition and mycorrhizal nitrogen uptake in a boreal forest. , 2007, The New phytologist.

[29]  François Pompanon,et al.  An In silico approach for the evaluation of DNA barcodes , 2010, BMC Genomics.

[30]  Rita Sipos,et al.  Effect of primer mismatch, annealing temperature and PCR cycle number on 16S rRNA gene-targetting bacterial community analysis. , 2007, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[31]  S. Davies,et al.  Potential Link between Plant and Fungal Distributions in a Dipterocarp Rainforest: Community and Phylogenetic Structure of Tropical Ectomycorrhizal Fungi across a Plant and Soil Ecotone , 2009 .

[32]  T. Bruns,et al.  ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes ‐ application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts , 1993, Molecular ecology.

[33]  M. Chase,et al.  Barcoding of Plants and Fungi , 2009, Science.

[34]  T. Bruns,et al.  The molecular revolution in ectomycorrhizal ecology: peeking into the black‐box , 2001, Molecular ecology.

[35]  Kenji Matsuura,et al.  Reconstructing the early evolution of Fungi using a six-gene phylogeny , 2006, Nature.

[36]  F. Martin,et al.  454 Pyrosequencing analyses of forest soils reveal an unexpectedly high fungal diversity. , 2009, The New phytologist.

[37]  B. Deagle,et al.  Quantification of damage in DNA recovered from highly degraded samples – a case study on DNA in faeces , 2006, Frontiers in Zoology.

[38]  Patrick M. Gillevet,et al.  Characterization of the Oral Fungal Microbiome (Mycobiome) in Healthy Individuals , 2010, PLoS pathogens.