Investigating Confidence Histograms and Classification in FSV: Part I. Fuzzy FSV

One important aspect of the feature selective validation (FSV) method is that it classifies comparison data into a number of natural-language categories. This allows comparison data generated by FSV to be compared with equivalent “visual” comparisons obtained using the visual rating scale. Previous research has shown a close relationship between visual assessment and FSV generated data using the resulting confidence histograms. In all cases, the category membership functions are “crisp”: that is data on the FSV value axis fall distinctly into one category. An important open question in FSV-based research, and for validation techniques generally, is whether allowed variability in these crisp category membership functions could further improve agreement with the visual assessment. A similar and related question is how robust is FSV to variation in the categorization algorithm. This paper and its associated “part II” present research aimed at developing a better understanding of the categorization of both visual and FSV data using nonsquare or variable boundary category membership functions. This first paper investigates the level of improvement to be expected by applying fuzzy logic to location of the category boundaries. The result is limited improvement to FSV, showing that FSV categorization is actually robust to variations in category boundaries.

[1]  Alistair Duffy,et al.  A visual interpretation rating scale for validation of numerical models , 2005 .

[2]  Jos Knockaert,et al.  Comparing EMC-signatures by FSV as a quality assessment tool , 2011 .

[3]  Wang Yin Chai,et al.  Compactness measurement using fuzzy multicriteria decision making for redistricting , 2001, Proceedings of IEEE Region 10 International Conference on Electrical and Electronic Technology. TENCON 2001 (Cat. No.01CH37239).

[4]  Antonio Orlandi,et al.  Impact of Shorting Vias Placement on Embedded Planar Electromagnetic BandGap Structures Within Multilayer Printed Circuit Boards , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[5]  Laurence Tianruo Yang,et al.  Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications , 1999 .

[6]  Antonio Orlandi,et al.  Factors influencing the successful validation of transient phenomenon modelling , 2010, 2010 Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[7]  Ying Lu,et al.  Unstructured Decision-Making Model Base on Grey Fuzzy Number , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security.

[8]  Ferran Silva,et al.  Transient FDTD simulation validation , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[9]  L Raimondo,et al.  A Simple and Efficient Design Procedure for Planar Electromagnetic Bandgap Structures on Printed Circuit Boards , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[10]  Yang Xue,et al.  Main steam temperature composite control system based on variable universe fuzzy logic control integrated with immune and self-tuning PID controller , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics.

[11]  A. Orlandi,et al.  Feature selective validation (FSV) for validation of computational electromagnetics (CEM). part II- assessment of FSV performance , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[12]  F de Paulis,et al.  IR-DROP Analysis and Thermal Assessment of Planar Electromagnetic Bandgap Structures for Power Integrity Applications , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Advanced Packaging.

[13]  A. Orlandi,et al.  Feature selective validation (FSV) for validation of computational electromagnetics (CEM). part I-the FSV method , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[14]  Jun Fan,et al.  Applying feature selective validation (FSV) as an objective function for data optimization , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[15]  A. Orlandi,et al.  Enhancing feature selective validation (FSV) interpretation of EMC/SI results with grade-spread , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2006. EMC 2006..

[16]  Antonio Orlandi,et al.  Three dimensional full wave validation of the Maxwell Garnett to Debye model approach , 2011, 10th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility.