Modeling of a large‐scale magneto‐rheological damper for seismic hazard mitigation. Part II: Semi‐active mode

SUMMARY Magneto-rheological (MR) dampers are a promising device for seismic hazard mitigation because their damping characteristics can be varied adaptively using an appropriate control law. During the last few decades researchers have investigated the behavior of MR dampers and semi-active control laws associated with these types of dampers for earthquake hazard mitigation. A majority of this research has involved small-scale MR dampers. To investigate the dynamic behavior of a large-scale MR damper, characterization tests were conducted at the Lehigh Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation equipment site on large-scale MR dampers. A new MR damper model, called the Maxwell Nonlinear Slider (MNS) model, is developed based on the characterization tests and is reported in this paper. The MNS model can independently describe the pre-yield and post-yield behavior of an MR damper, which makes it easy to identify the model parameters. The MNS model utilizes Hershel–Bulkley visco-plasticity to describe the post-yield non-Newtonian fluid behavior, that is, shear thinning and thickening behavior, of the MR fluid that occurs in the dampers. The predicted response of a large-scale damper from the MNS model along with that from existing Bouc–Wen and hyperbolic tangent models, are compared with measured response from various experiments. The comparisons show that the MNS model achieves better accuracy than the existing models in predicting damper response under cyclic loading. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Jeong-Hoi Koo,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of the response time of MR dampers , 2006 .

[2]  Wl L. Qu,et al.  Seismic response control of frame structures using magnetorheological/electrorheological dampers , 2000 .

[3]  B.J. Bass,et al.  System Identification of a 200 kN Magneto-Rheological Fluid Damper for Structural Control in Large-Scale Smart Structures , 2007, 2007 American Control Conference.

[4]  Lawrence A. Bergman,et al.  SLIDING MODE CONTROL OF CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE SUBJECTED TO SEISMIC EXCITATION , 2003 .

[5]  O. V. Stryk,et al.  Modelling and simulation of electro- and magnetorheological fluid dampers , 2002 .

[6]  Junji Furusho,et al.  Fast Response MR-Fluid Actuator , 2004 .

[7]  H. Gavin Multi-Duct ER Dampers , 2001 .

[8]  Seung-Bok Choi,et al.  Vibration Control Evaluation of a Commercial Vehicle Featuring MR Seat Damper , 2002 .

[9]  Yozo Fujino,et al.  Semiactive Damping of Stay Cables , 1999 .

[10]  James M. Ricles,et al.  HybridFEM: A PROGRAM FOR DYNAMIC TIME HISTORY ANALYSIS OF 2D INELASTIC FRAMED STRUCTURES AND REAL-TIME HYBRID SIMULATION HybridFEM Version 4.2.4 User's Manual , 2010 .

[11]  Meiying Ye,et al.  Parameter estimation of the Bouc–Wen hysteresis model using particle swarm optimization , 2007 .

[12]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Evaluation of Structural Control Strategies for Improving Seismic Performance of Buildings with MR Dampers Using Real-Time Large-Scale Hybrid Simulation , 2010 .

[13]  Mark J. Schulz,et al.  A Magnetorheological Semi-Active Isolator to Reduce Noise and Vibration Transmissibility in Automobiles , 2003 .

[14]  O. Mercan,et al.  Real‐time hybrid testing using the unconditionally stable explicit CR integration algorithm , 2009 .

[15]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Large-scale MR fluid dampers: modeling and dynamic performance considerations , 2002 .

[16]  Y. Ribakov,et al.  Selective controlled base isolation system with magnetorheological dampers , 2002 .

[17]  J. Ricles,et al.  Development of Direct Integration Algorithms for Structural Dynamics Using Discrete Control Theory , 2008 .

[18]  William T. Holmes,et al.  The 1997 NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures , 2000 .

[19]  Johnny Sun,et al.  Development of Ground Motion Time Histories for Phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC Steel Project , 1997 .

[20]  Y. Wen Method for Random Vibration of Hysteretic Systems , 1976 .

[21]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Real-time Hybrid Simulation Studies of Complex Large-Scale Systems Using Multi-Grid Processing , 2012 .

[22]  Yunbyeong Chae,et al.  Seismic Hazard Mitigation of Building Structures Using Magneto-Rheological Dampers , 2011 .

[23]  Katsuaki Sunakoda,et al.  Development of Large Capacity Semi-Active Seismic Damper Using Magneto-Rheological Fluid , 2004 .

[24]  Khaldoon A. Bani-Hani,et al.  Semi‐active neuro‐control for base‐isolation system using magnetorheological (MR) dampers , 2006 .

[25]  Faramarz Gordaninejad,et al.  Field-controllable electro- and magneto-rheological fluid dampers in flow mode using Herschel-Bulkley theory , 2000, Smart Structures.

[26]  Zhaoshuo Jiang,et al.  A comparison of 200 kN magneto-rheological damper models for use in real-time hybrid simulation pretesting , 2011 .

[27]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Modeling and Control of Magnetorheological Dampers for Seismic Response Reduction , 1996 .

[28]  Norman M. Wereley,et al.  Analysis of electro- and magneto-rheological flow mode dampers using Herschel-Bulkley model , 2000, Smart Structures.

[29]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  PHENOMENOLOGICAL MODEL FOR MAGNETORHEOLOGICAL DAMPERS , 1997 .

[30]  Paul N. Roschke,et al.  Neuro-fuzzy control of structures using acceleration feedback , 2001 .

[31]  James Kennedy,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 2002, Proceedings of ICNN'95 - International Conference on Neural Networks.