Advancing multilevel thinking in human resource management research: Applications and guidelines

Strategic Human Resource Management (SHRM) researchers have recently turned their attention to using various levels of analysis in examining the relationship between HRM and performance. Despite several calls for research that integrates multiple levels of analysis, HRM research has yet to apply a multilevel approach to its full advantage. In our view, the paucity of multilevel research is rooted in the lack of what we label multilevel thinking: the application of multilevel principles. In this conceptual paper, we develop 9 guidelines based on tailored multilevel HRM principles that offer a course of action for scholars who are interested in conducting multilevel HRM research. Following Kozlowski and Klein (2000), we build these principles around the what, how, where, when, and why questions in multilevel HRM research. Based on an analysis of 88 empirical multilevel HRM studies, we identify the approaches commonly applied when using multilevel principles, explain the weaknesses in current multilevel HRM studies, and offer what we consider good examples of a rigorous approach.

[1]  Elaine Farndale,et al.  Implementing Performance Appraisal: Exploring the Employee Experience , 2013 .

[2]  Anthony R. Wheeler,et al.  How job-level HRM effectiveness influences employee intent to turnover and workarounds in hospitals , 2012 .

[3]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A Review and Integration of Team Composition Models , 2014 .

[4]  Jaap Paauwe,et al.  Unraveling the different black boxes : In search of theories explaining the black boxes between HRM and performance , 2013 .

[5]  B. Gerhart,et al.  The Impact of Human Resource Management on Organizational Performance: Progress and Prospects , 1996 .

[6]  Jody Hoffer Gittell,et al.  A Relational Model of How High-Performance Work Systems Work , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[7]  Pankaj C. Patel,et al.  Unlocking the black box: exploring the link between high-performance work systems and performance. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[8]  A. Peluso,et al.  The Interplay Between HR Practices and Perceived Behavioural Integrity in Determining Positive Employee Outcomes , 2012 .

[9]  David P. Lepak,et al.  Do they see eye to eye? Management and employee perspectives of high-performance work systems and influence processes on service quality. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[10]  Joo Hun Han,et al.  What it takes to get proactive: An integrative multilevel model of the antecedents of personal initiative. , 2016, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  M. Zollo,et al.  Understanding the exploration–exploitation dilemma: An fMRI study of attention control and decision-making performance , 2015 .

[12]  J. Benson,et al.  When CSR Is a Social Norm , 2016 .

[13]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  It's About Time: Temporal Structuring in Organizations , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[14]  Samuel Aryee,et al.  Impact of high-performance work systems on individual- and branch-level performance: test of a multilevel model of intermediate linkages. , 2012, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  David P. Lepak,et al.  Involvement work systems and operational effectiveness: Exploring the moderating effect of national power distance , 2015 .

[16]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  Strategic HRM and Organizational Behavior: Integrating Multiple Levels of Analysis , 2006 .

[17]  Jie Shen,et al.  Principles and Applications of Multilevel Modeling in Human Resource Management Research , 2016 .

[18]  J. Looise,et al.  Affecting innovation through HRM: the role of creative capital , 2014 .

[19]  B. Vermeeren.  Variability in HRM implementation among line managers and its effect on performance: a 2-1-2 mediational multilevel approach , 2014 .

[20]  V. Onyemah,et al.  How HRM control affects boundary-spanning employees' behavioural strategies and satisfaction: the moderating impact of cultural performance orientation , 2010 .

[21]  K. Sanders,et al.  The HRM Process Approach: The Influence of Employees’ Attribution to Explain the HRM‐Performance Relationship , 2016 .

[22]  Marcel A. Croon,et al.  HRM, Communication, Satisfaction, and Perceived Performance , 2013 .

[23]  Hilla Peretz,et al.  Organizational diversity programs across cultures: effects on absenteeism, turnover, performance and innovation , 2015 .

[24]  Ningyu Tang,et al.  A multilevel analysis of the effects of HR diversity management on employee knowledge sharing: the case of Chinese employees , 2014 .

[25]  M. Tayeb.  Transfer of HRM practices across cultures: An American company in Scotland , 1997 .

[26]  Rebecca R. Kehoe,et al.  The Impact of High-Performance Human Resource Practices on Employees’ Attitudes and Behaviors , 2013 .

[27]  Sven Kepes,et al.  The influence of internal HRM activity fit on the dynamics within the "black box"☆ , 2015 .

[28]  Violet T. Ho,et al.  I-Deals: Idiosyncratic Terms in Employment Relationships , 2006 .

[29]  M. Heffernan,et al.  Cross-level effects of high-performance work Systems (HPWS) and employee wellbeing: the mediating effect of organisational justice , 2016 .

[30]  Stephen Wood,et al.  High involvement management, high-performance work systems and well-being , 2011 .

[31]  Amber Yun-Ping Lee,et al.  High performance work systems, employee well-being, and job involvement: an empirical study , 2016 .

[32]  G. Dietz,et al.  Commonalities and contradictions in HRM and performance research , 2005 .

[33]  Michail Veliziotis,et al.  Absence management of migrant agency workers in the food manufacturing sector , 2016 .

[34]  M. Veldhoven,et al.  Cross-level effects of high-performance work practices on burnout: Two counteracting mediating mechanisms compared , 2009 .

[35]  H. Seeck,et al.  From HRM to psychological contracting - the case of Finnish mobile content producing companies , 2010 .

[36]  Silvia Dello Russo,et al.  Individual perceptions of HR practices, HRM strength and appropriateness of care: a meso, multilevel approach , 2018 .

[37]  M. Croon,et al.  Enriched job design, high involvement management and organizational performance: The mediating roles of job satisfaction and well-being , 2012 .

[38]  Matthew T. Luth,et al.  Team-level high involvement work practices: investigating the role of knowledge sharing and perspective taking , 2016 .

[39]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  Emergence of the Human Capital Resource: A Multilevel Model , 2011 .

[40]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Knowledge Exchange and Combination: The Role of Human Resource Practices in the Performance of High-Technology Firms , 2006 .

[41]  Sankalp Chaturvedi,et al.  The Role of Procedural Justice and Power Distance in the Relationship Between High Performance Work Systems and Employee Attitudes: A Multilevel Perspective , 2009 .

[42]  Sandra G. Leggat,et al.  The effects of high-performance work systems on hospital employees' work attitudes and intention to leave: a multi-level and occupational group analysis , 2013 .

[43]  Yu-Chen Wei,et al.  Do employees high in general human capital tend to have higher turnover intention? The moderating role of high-performance HR practices and P-O fit , 2015 .

[44]  Alex Bitektine,et al.  The “Macro” and the “Micro” of Legitimacy: Toward a Multilevel Theory of the Legitimacy Process , 2015 .

[45]  A. Langley.  Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[46]  R. Schuler.  Strategic human resources management: Linking the people with the strategic needs of the business☆ , 1992 .

[47]  Kaifeng Jiang,et al.  Where Do We Go from Here? New Perspectives on the Black Box in Strategic Human Resource Management Research , 2013 .

[48]  Greg L. Stewart,et al.  AN EXPLORATION OF MEMBER ROLES AS A MULTILEVEL LINKING MECHANISM FOR INDIVIDUAL TRAITS AND TEAM OUTCOMES , 2005 .

[49]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[50]  B. Cooper,et al.  HR practices from the perspective of managers and employees in multinational enterprises in China: Alignment issues and implications , 2013 .

[51]  Xiaoyun Wang,et al.  ‘Intended’ and ‘implemented’ HRM: the missing linchpin in strategic human resource management research , 2006 .

[52]  P. Wright,et al.  Desegregating HRM: A Review and Synthesis of Micro and Macro Human Resource Management Research , 2002 .

[53]  Jin Nam Choi,et al.  Pay for performance in emerging markets: Insights from China , 2010 .

[54]  Beatrice van der Heijden,et al.  Enjoying new ways to work: An HRM process approach to study flow , 2014 .

[55]  Jørn Hetland,et al.  Do new ways of working foster work engagement? , 2012, Psicothema.

[56]  J. Benson,et al.  High‐Performance Work Systems and Teachers’ Work Performance: The Mediating Role of Quality of Working Life , 2014 .

[57]  Yi‐Ying Chang.  High-performance work systems, joint impact of transformational leadership, an empowerment climate and organizational ambidexterity: Cross level evidence , 2016 .

[58]  David P. Lepak,et al.  EMPLOYEE ATTRIBUTIONS OF THE “WHY” OF HR PRACTICES: THEIR EFFECTS ON EMPLOYEE ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIORS, AND CUSTOMER SATISFACTION , 2008 .

[59]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Time: A New Research Lens , 2001 .

[60]  M. Allen,et al.  High-investment HR values and firm performance among local firms and U.S. MNCs’ subsidiaries in South Asia: a comparative study , 2016 .

[61]  P. Blau.  Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[62]  Cheri Ostroff,et al.  Moving HR to a higher level: HR practices and organizational effectiveness. , 2000 .

[63]  Pankaj C. Patel,et al.  High-Performance Work Systems and Job Control , 2013 .

[64]  S. Beijer,et al.  The role of employee HR attributions in the relationship between high‐performance work systems and employee outcomes , 2015 .

[65]  John E. Delery,et al.  HRM Systems and the Problem of Internal Fit , 2008 .

[66]  H. Simon,et al.  The Organization of Complex Systems , 1977 .

[67]  K. Law,et al.  High-Performance Human Resource Practices, Citizenship Behavior, and Organizational Performance: A Relational Perspective , 2007 .

[68]  H. Liao,et al.  A MULTILEVEL INVESTIGATION OF FACTORS INFLUENCING EMPLOYEE SERVICE PERFORMANCE AND CUSTOMER OUTCOMES , 2004 .

[69]  J. Rentsch.  Climate and culture : interaction and qualitative differences in organizational meanings , 1990 .

[70]  W. Chang,et al.  Work Design–Related Antecedents of Turnover Intention: A Multilevel Approach , 2013 .

[71]  S. Jackson,et al.  Can Knowledge-Intensive Teamwork Be Managed? Examining the Roles of HRM Systems, Leadership, and Tacit Knowledge , 2016 .

[72]  Suzanne T Bell,et al.  Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: a meta-analysis. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[73]  S. Evans.  Juggling on the line: Front line managers and their management of human resources in the retail industry , 2015 .

[74]  Tzu-Shian Han,et al.  A multilevel investigation of relationships among brand‐centered HRM, brand psychological ownership, brand citizenship behaviors, and customer satisfaction , 2012 .

[75]  Kathy Monks.  Understanding how HR systems work: the role of HR philosophy and HR processes , 2012 .

[76]  D. Bowen,et al.  Understanding HRM–Firm Performance Linkages: The Role of the “Strength” of the HRM System , 2004 .

[77]  Eunmi Chang.  Employees’ overall perception of HRM effectiveness , 2005 .

[78]  Arnold B. Bakker,et al.  Weekly work engagement and performance: A study among starting teachers , 2010 .

[79]  Alina M. Baluch.  Employee perceptions of HRM and well-being in nonprofit organizations: unpacking the unintended , 2017 .

[80]  D. Holman,et al.  Work Design Variation and Outcomes in Call Centers: Strategic Choice and Institutional Explanations , 2009 .

[81]  David P. Lepak,et al.  Employees as Active Consumers of HRM: Linking Employees’ HRM Competences with Their Perceptions of HRM Service Value , 2016 .

[82]  C. Fisher,et al.  Using experience sampling methodology in organizational behavior. , 2012 .

[83]  James G. Combs,et al.  HOW MUCH DO HIGH-PERFORMANCE WORK PRACTICES MATTER? A META-ANALYSIS OF THEIR EFFECTS ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE , 2006 .

[84]  Upam Pushpak Makhecha,et al.  Multi-level gaps: a study of intended, actual and experienced human resource practices in a hypermarket chain in India , 2018 .

[85]  Chidiebere Ogbonnaya,et al.  High performance work practices, employee outcomes and organizational performance: a 2-1-2 multilevel mediation analysis , 2018 .

[86]  Jeremy C. Short,et al.  The Art of Writing a Review Article , 2009 .

[87]  Huub J. M. Ruël,et al.  The strategic value of e-HRM: results from an exploratory study in a governmental organization , 2013 .

[88]  Christopher M. Harris,et al.  The effect of management and employee perspectives of high-performance work systems on employees’ discretionary behaviour , 2016 .

[89]  D. Minbaeva,et al.  Strategic HRM in building micro-foundations of organizational knowledge-based performance , 2013 .

[90]  Mary Ann Von Glinow,et al.  Organizational Life Cycles and Strategic International Human Resource Management in Multinational Companies: Implications for Congruence Theory , 1991 .

[91]  Len Holden.  HRM and employee involvement in Britain and Sweden:a comparative study , 1996 .

[92]  David P. Lepak,et al.  Examining the Human Resource Architecture: The Relationships Among Human Capital, Employment, and Human Resource Configurations , 2002 .

[93]  R. Kahn,et al.  The Social Psychology of Organizations , 1966 .

[94]  Fiona Edgar,et al.  HRM practice and employee attitudes: different measures – different results , 2005 .

[95]  Matthew E Falagas,et al.  Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses , 2007, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[96]  Brian E. Becker,et al.  Methodological Issues in Cross‐Sectional and Panel Estimates of the Human Resource‐Firm Performance Link , 1996 .

[97]  Song Chang,et al.  Do high-commitment work systems affect creativity? A multilevel combinational approach to employee creativity. , 2014, The Journal of applied psychology.

[98]  Steve W. J. Kozlowski,et al.  The Dynamics of Emergence: Cognition and Cohesion in Work Teams , 2012 .

[99]  David P. Lepak,et al.  Understanding Employees’ Perceptions of Human Resource Practices: Effects of Demographic Dissimilarity to Managers and Coworkers , 2017 .

[100]  Maarten van Riemsdijk,et al.  Implementing Human Resource Management Successfully: A First-Line Management Challenge , 2006 .

[101]  Christopher D. Zatzick,et al.  Putting employee involvement in context: a cross-level model examining job satisfaction and absenteeism in high-involvement work systems , 2011 .

[102]  K. Van de Voorde,et al.  Exploring the relationships between high involvement work system practices, work demands and emotional exhaustion: a multi-level study. , 2018 .

[103]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  Building Theoretical and Empirical Bridges Across Levels: Multilevel Research in Management , 2007 .

[104]  N. Bozionelos,et al.  Ambidexterity and Unit Performance: Intellectual Capital Antecedents and Cross-Level Moderating Effects of Human Resource Practices , 2015 .

[105]  Russell Cropanzano,et al.  Writing Nonempirical Articles for Journal of Management: General Thoughts and Suggestions , 2009 .

[106]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, a n d M e t h o d s i n Organizations Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2022 .

[107]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  The Myth of “the” Micro-Macro Divide: Bridging System-Level and Disciplinary Divides , 2011 .

[108]  T. Egan,et al.  Three Approaches to Multilevel Theory Building , 2010 .

[109]  David P. Lepak,et al.  How Does Human Resource Management Influence Organizational Outcomes? A Meta-analytic Investigation of Mediating Mechanisms , 2012 .

[110]  J. Arthur,et al.  Validating the human resource system structure: A levels-based strategic HRM approach , 2007 .

[111]  Andrew Hess,et al.  Building Dynamic Capabilities: Innovation Driven by Individual-, Firm-, and Network-Level Effects , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[112]  Ellen M. Whitener,et al.  Do “high commitment” human resource practices affect employee commitment? A cross-level analysis using hierarchical linear modeling , 2001 .

[113]  G. Gelade,et al.  The integration of human resource and operation management practices and its link with performance: A longitudinal latent class study , 2010 .

[114]  J. Paauwe.  HRM and Performance: Achievements, Methodological Issues and Prospects , 2009 .

[115]  David P. Lepak,et al.  THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS OF A SOCIAL SYSTEM: CROSS‐LEVEL EFFECTS OF HIGH‐PERFORMANCE WORK SYSTEMS ON EMPLOYEES’ ATTITUDES , 2009 .

[116]  David B. Zoogah.  Tribal diversity, human resources management practices, and firm performance , 2016 .

[117]  F. Koster,et al.  Competition and Constraint. Economic Globalization and Human Resource Practices in 23 European Countries , 2015 .

[118]  Benjamin Schneider,et al.  The ASA framework: An update. , 1995 .

[119]  Yi‐Ying Chang.  A multilevel examination of high‐performance work systems and unit‐level organisational ambidexterity , 2015 .

[120]  Brian Harney,et al.  Unlocking the black box: line managers and HRM‐Performance in a call centre context , 2008 .

[121]  Brent A. Scott,et al.  The Interactive Effects of Personal Traits and Experienced States on Intraindividual Patterns of Citizenship Behavior , 2006 .

[122]  Yu‐Fang Yen,et al.  The Mediating Effects of Psychological Contracts on the Relationship Between Human Resource Systems and Role Behaviors: A Multilevel Analysis , 2009 .

[123]  Laura Innocenti,et al.  Age as moderator in the relationship between HR development practices and employees’ positive attitudes , 2013 .

[124]  D. Rousseau.  Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. , 1985 .

[125]  J. H. Gittell.  Organizing work to support relational co-ordination , 2000 .

[126]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams , 2006, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[127]  J. Meijerink,et al.  Advancing multilevel thinking and methods in HRM research , 2016 .

[128]  Torsten Biemann,et al.  Human resource management systems and work attitudes: The mediating role of future time perspective , 2017 .

[129]  A. Aritzeta,et al.  Exploring the black box in Spanish firms: the effect of the actual and perceived system on employees' commitment and organizational performance , 2011 .

[130]  Tzu-Shian Han,et al.  High-performance HR practices and OCB: a cross-level investigation of a causal path , 2010 .

[131]  Po-Chien Chang,et al.  Crossing the level of employee's performance: HPWS, affective commitment, human capital, and employee job performance in professional service organizations , 2011 .

[132]  Kathy Monks,et al.  Understanding how HR Systems Work: The Role of HR Processes and HR Practices , 2013 .

[133]  S. Frenkel,et al.  Where hukou status matters: analyzing the linkage between supervisor perceptions of HR practices and employee work engagement , 2017 .

[134]  M. Veldhoven,et al.  Connecting empowerment-focused HRM and labour productivity to work engagement: the mediating role of job demands and resources , 2016 .

[135]  Rhokeun Park.  Autonomy and citizenship behavior: a moderated mediation model , 2016 .

[136]  Johngseok Bae,et al.  Do high-involvement HRM practices matter for worker creativity? a cross-level approach , 2018 .

[137]  C. Santos,et al.  Multilevel Research in the Field of Organizational Behavior , 2013 .

[138]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  THE IMPACT OF MOTIVATION, EMPOWERMENT, AND SKILL‐ENHANCING PRACTICES ON AGGREGATE VOLUNTARY TURNOVER: THE MEDIATING EFFECT OF COLLECTIVE AFFECTIVE COMMITMENT , 2011 .

[139]  Jang-Ho Choi,et al.  Effects of employees' perceptions on the relationship between HR practices and firm performance for Korean firms , 2013 .

[140]  P. Jarzabkowski.  Strategy as Practice: Recursiveness, Adaptation, and Practices-in-Use , 2004 .

[141]  T. Rigotti,et al.  Training and Performance of a Diverse Workforce , 2014 .

[142]  A. Kinicki,et al.  Organizational Culture and Climate , 2003 .

[143]  J. Paauwe,et al.  Balancing HRM: the psychological contract of employees , 2011 .

[144]  F. Allport,et al.  The structuring of events: outline of a general theory with applications to psychology. , 1954, Psychological review.

[145]  Romina García-Chas,et al.  High-performance work systems and job satisfaction: a multilevel model , 2016 .

[146]  J. Farr,et al.  Linking innovation and creativity with human resources strategies and practices: A matter of fit or flexibility? , 2008 .

[147]  Tom Redman,et al.  HRM Practices, Organizational Citizenship Behaviour, and Performance: A Multi-Level Analysis , 2010 .

[148]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[149]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. , 1978, Administrative science quarterly.

[150]  C. Kydd,et al.  Using human resource management to enhance competitiveness: Lessons from four excellent companies , 1990 .

[151]  J. Paauwe,et al.  Challenging ‘strategic HRM’ and the relevance of the institutional setting , 2003 .

[152]  Anthony J. Nyberg,et al.  Resource-Based Perspectives on Unit-Level Human Capital , 2014 .

[153]  C. Fulmer,et al.  Convergence and emergence in organizations: An integrative framework and review , 2016 .

[154]  P. Bal,et al.  How Do Developmental and Accommodative HRM Enhance Employee Engagement and Commitment? The Role of Psychological Contract and SOC Strategies , 2013 .

[155]  Monowar Mahmood.  Strategy, structure, and HRM policy orientation: Employee recruitment and selection practices in multinational subsidiaries , 2015 .