Crowding Changes Appearance

Summary Crowding is the breakdown in object recognition that occurs in cluttered visual environments [1–4] and the fundamental limit on peripheral vision, affecting identification within many visual modalities [5–9] and across large spatial regions [10]. Though frequently characterized as a disruptive process through which object representations are suppressed [11, 12] or lost altogether [13–15], we demonstrate that crowding systematically changes the appearance of objects. In particular, target patches of visual noise that are surrounded (“crowded”) by oriented Gabor flankers become perceptually oriented, matching the flankers. This was established with a change-detection paradigm: under crowded conditions, target changes from noise to Gabor went unnoticed when the Gabor orientation matched the flankers (and the illusory target percept), despite being easily detected when they differed. Rotation of the flankers (leaving target noise unaltered) also induced illusory target rotations. Blank targets led to similar results, demonstrating that crowding can induce apparent structure where none exists. Finally, adaptation to these stimuli induced a tilt aftereffect at the target location, consistent with signals from the flankers “spreading” across space. These results confirm predictions from change-based models of crowding, such as averaging [16], and establish crowding as a regularization process that simplifies the peripheral field by promoting consistent appearance among adjacent objects.

[1]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap. , 1994 .

[2]  J. Lund,et al.  Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Visual transients without feature changes are sufficient for the percept of a change , 2004, Vision Research.

[4]  H. Strasburger Unfocused spatial attention underlies the crowding effect in indirect form vision. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[5]  G Wolford,et al.  Perturbation model for letter identification. , 1975, Psychological review.

[6]  S. Klein,et al.  Suppressive and facilitatory spatial interactions in peripheral vision: peripheral crowding is neither size invariant nor simple contrast masking. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[7]  Anke Huckauf,et al.  What various kinds of errors tell us about lateral masking effects , 2002 .

[8]  C. Clifford Perceptual adaptation: motion parallels orientation , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  H. Wilson,et al.  Lateral interactions in peripherally viewed texture arrays. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[10]  R. L. Gregory,et al.  Perceptual filling in of artificially induced scotomas in human vision , 1991, Nature.

[11]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  The Motion Aftereffect:A Modern Perspective , 1998 .

[12]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness , 1996, Nature.

[13]  D. Levi Crowding—An essential bottleneck for object recognition: A mini-review , 2008, Vision Research.

[14]  A. Mizuno,et al.  A change of the leading player in flow Visualization technique , 2006, J. Vis..

[15]  I. Rentschler,et al.  Contrast thresholds for identification of numeric characters in direct and eccentric view , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  B. C. Motter Central V4 Receptive Fields Are Scaled by the V1 Cortical Magnification and Correspond to a Constant-Sized Sampling of the V1 Surface , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  R F Hess,et al.  Contour interaction in fovea and periphery. , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[19]  S. Dakin,et al.  Spatial interference among moving targets , 2005, Vision Research.

[20]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Strength of early visual adaptation depends on visual awareness. , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  D. Hubel,et al.  Uniformity of monkey striate cortex: A parallel relationship between field size, scatter, and magnification factor , 1974, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[22]  Steven C Dakin,et al.  Positional averaging explains crowding with letter-like stimuli , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Frans W Cornelissen,et al.  The Eyelink Toolbox: Eye tracking with MATLAB and the Psychophysics Toolbox , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[24]  Ronald A. Rensink Change detection. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[25]  D. Fitzpatrick Seeing beyond the receptive field in primary visual cortex , 2000, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[26]  R. Steinman Effect of Target Size, Luminance, and Color on Monocular Fixation* , 1965 .

[27]  D. Levi,et al.  The effect of similarity and duration on spatial interaction in peripheral vision. , 1994, Spatial vision.

[28]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Long-range dichoptic interactions in the human visual cortex in the region corresponding to the blind spot , 1994, Vision Research.

[29]  Anirvan S. Nandy,et al.  The nature of letter crowding as revealed by first- and second-order classification images. , 2007, Journal of Vision.

[30]  G. Chastain Inhibition of feature extraction with multiple instances of the target feature in different orientations , 1981 .

[31]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1994 .

[32]  U. Polat,et al.  The architecture of perceptual spatial interactions , 1994, Vision Research.

[33]  D. Levi,et al.  The two-dimensional shape of spatial interaction zones in the parafovea , 1992, Vision Research.

[34]  D. Pelli,et al.  The uncrowded window of object recognition , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[36]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  A Parametric Texture Model Based on Joint Statistics of Complex Wavelet Coefficients , 2000, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[37]  Y. Petrov,et al.  Crowding is directed to the fovea and preserves only feature contrast. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[38]  H. BOUMA,et al.  Interaction Effects in Parafoveal Letter Recognition , 1970, Nature.

[39]  J. Cass,et al.  Dissociable effects of attention and crowding on orientation averaging. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[40]  D. Pelli,et al.  Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: distinguishing feature integration from detection. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[41]  Carol L. Krumhansl,et al.  Effect of level of confusability on reporting letters from briefly presented visual displays , 1977 .

[42]  K. Fujii,et al.  Visualization for the analysis of fluid motion , 2005, J. Vis..

[43]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[44]  A. T. Smith,et al.  Estimating receptive field size from fMRI data in human striate and extrastriate visual cortex. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[45]  G L WALLS,et al.  The filling-in process. , 1954, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[46]  Katsumi Aoki,et al.  Recent development of flow visualization , 2004, J. Vis..

[47]  Neil W. Roach,et al.  Centrifugal propagation of motion adaptation effects across visual space. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[48]  R. Watt,et al.  The computation of orientation statistics from visual texture , 1997, Vision Research.

[49]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  How big is a Gabor patch, and why should we care? , 1997 .

[50]  M C FLOM,et al.  VISUAL RESOLUTION AND CONTOUR INTERACTION. , 1963, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[51]  G. Chastain,et al.  Feature mislocalizations and misjudgments of intercharacter distance , 1982, Psychological research.

[52]  Endel Põder,et al.  Crowding with detection and coarse discrimination of simple visual features. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[53]  R Over,et al.  Tilt aftereffects in central and peripheral vision. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[54]  M. Crossland,et al.  The effect of age and fixation instability on retinotopic mapping of primary visual cortex. , 2008, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[55]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The Spatial Resolution of Visual Attention , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[56]  Susana T. L. Chung,et al.  Spatial-frequency characteristics of letter identification in central and peripheral vision , 2002, Vision Research.

[57]  Frans W Cornelissen,et al.  On the generality of crowding: visual crowding in size, saturation, and hue compared to orientation. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[58]  D. Pelli,et al.  Are faces processed like words? A diagnostic test for recognition by parts. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[59]  P. Bex,et al.  The twinkle aftereffect is pre-cortical and is independent of filling-in. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[60]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Perceptual filling-in: a parametric study , 1998, Vision Research.

[61]  Denis G Pelli,et al.  An escape from crowding. , 2007, Journal of vision.