Reducing Sparsity Improves the Recognition of Implicit Discourse Relations
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Claire Cardie,et al. Improving Implicit Discourse Relation Recognition Through Feature Set Optimization , 2012, SIGDIAL Conference.
[2] Jian Su,et al. Predicting Discourse Connectives for Implicit Discourse Relation Recognition , 2010, COLING.
[3] Hwee Tou Ng,et al. A PDTB-styled end-to-end discourse parser , 2012, Natural Language Engineering.
[4] Alex Lascarides,et al. Edinburgh Research Explorer Using automatically labelled examples to classify rhetorical relations: an assessment , 2022 .
[5] Hwee Tou Ng,et al. Recognizing Implicit Discourse Relations in the Penn Discourse Treebank , 2009, EMNLP.
[6] Ani Nenkova,et al. Automatic sense prediction for implicit discourse relations in text , 2009, ACL.
[7] Owen Rambow,et al. Building and Refining Rhetorical-Semantic Relation Models , 2007, HLT-NAACL.
[8] Danushka Bollegala,et al. A Semi-Supervised Approach to Improve Classification of Infrequent Discourse Relations Using Feature Vector Extension , 2010, EMNLP.
[9] Ludmila I. Kuncheva,et al. Measures of Diversity in Classifier Ensembles and Their Relationship with the Ensemble Accuracy , 2003, Machine Learning.
[10] Daniel Marcu,et al. An Unsupervised Approach to Recognizing Discourse Relations , 2002, ACL.
[11] Thorsten Joachims,et al. Making large-scale support vector machine learning practical , 1999 .
[12] Kathleen McKeown,et al. Aggregated Word Pair Features for Implicit Discourse Relation Disambiguation , 2013, ACL.
[13] Beatrice Santorini,et al. Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: The Penn Treebank , 1993, CL.
[14] Livio Robaldo,et al. The Penn Discourse TreeBank 2.0. , 2008, LREC.