Minimally interactive placenta segmentation from three-dimensional ultrasound images

Abstract. Purpose: Placental size in early pregnancy has been associated with important clinical outcomes, including fetal growth. However, extraction of placental size from three-dimensional ultrasound (3DUS) requires time-consuming interactive segmentation methods and is prone to user variability. We propose a semiautomated segmentation technique that requires minimal user input to robustly measure placental volume from 3DUS images. Approach: For semiautomated segmentation, a single, central 2D slice was manually annotated to initialize an automated multi-atlas label fusion (MALF) algorithm. The dataset consisted of 47 3DUS volumes obtained at 11 to 14 weeks in singleton pregnancies (28 anterior and 19 posterior). Twenty-six of these subjects were imaged twice within the same session. Dice overlap and surface distance were used to quantify the automated segmentation accuracy compared to expert manual segmentations. The mean placental volume measurements obtained by our method and VOCAL (virtual organ computer-aided analysis), a leading commercial semiautomated method, were compared to the manual reference set. The test–retest reliability was also assessed. Results: The overlap between our automated segmentation and manual (mean Dice: 0.824  ±  0.061, median: 0.831) was within the range reported by other methods requiring extensive manual input. The average surface distance was 1.66  ±  0.96  mm. The correlation coefficient between test–retest volumes was r  =  0.88, and the intraclass correlation was ICC  (  1  )    =  0.86. Conclusions: MALF is a promising method that can allow accurate and reliable segmentation of the placenta with minimal user interaction. Further refinement of this technique may allow for placental biometry to be incorporated into clinical pregnancy surveillance.

[1]  Nadav Schwartz,et al.  366: Placental volume measurements early in pregnancy predict adverse perinatal outcomes , 2009 .

[2]  Wanda K Nicholson,et al.  Gross placental measures and childhood growth , 2009, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[3]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  A learning-based wrapper method to correct systematic errors in automatic image segmentation: Consistently improved performance in hippocampus, cortex and brain segmentation , 2011, NeuroImage.

[4]  S. Biswas,et al.  Gross morphological changes of placentas associated with intrauterine growth restriction of fetuses: a case control study. , 2008, Early human development.

[5]  Lawrence Impey,et al.  Rapid calculation of standardized placental volume at 11 to 13 weeks and the prediction of small for gestational age babies. , 2013, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[6]  Xu Wang,et al.  Towards Automatic Semantic Segmentation in Volumetric Ultrasound , 2017, MICCAI.

[7]  M. Sammel,et al.  First-trimester placental ultrasound and maternal serum markers as predictors of small-for-gestational-age infants. , 2014, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  J. Noble,et al.  3-D Ultrasound Segmentation of the Placenta Using the Random Walker Algorithm: Reliability and Agreement. , 2015, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[9]  Paul A. Yushkevich,et al.  Combining Deep Learning and Multi-atlas Label Fusion for Automated Placenta Segmentation from 3DUS , 2018, DATRA/PIPPI@MICCAI.

[10]  Purang Abolmaesumi,et al.  A Multi-Atlas-Based Segmentation Framework for Prostate Brachytherapy , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Paul A. Yushkevich,et al.  Multi-atlas segmentation with joint label fusion and corrective learning—an open source implementation , 2013, Front. Neuroinform..

[12]  Walter Plasencia,et al.  Fully automated, real-time 3D ultrasound segmentation to estimate first trimester placental volume using deep learning. , 2018, JCI insight.

[13]  Paul A. Yushkevich,et al.  Automated Segmentation and Geometrical Modeling of the Tricuspid Aortic Valve in 3D Echocardiographic Images , 2013, MICCAI.

[14]  P. Golland,et al.  In Vivo Quantification of Placental Insufficiency by BOLD MRI: A Human Study , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[15]  Seth A. Smith,et al.  Groupwise multi-atlas segmentation of the spinal cord's internal structure , 2014, Medical Image Anal..

[16]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  Multi-atlas segmentation of biomedical images: A survey , 2014, Medical Image Anal..

[17]  Clive Osmond,et al.  Fetal and placental size and risk of hypertension in adult life. , 1990, BMJ.

[18]  Guido Gerig,et al.  User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: Significantly improved efficiency and reliability , 2006, NeuroImage.

[19]  Gordon N. Stevenson,et al.  Automatic 3D ultrasound segmentation of the first trimester placenta using deep learning , 2017, 2017 IEEE 14th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2017).

[20]  E. Wang,et al.  Two‐dimensional sonographic placental measurements in the prediction of small‐for‐gestational‐age infants , 2012, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[21]  Paul A. Yushkevich,et al.  Multi-Atlas Segmentation with Joint Label Fusion , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.