Using Transcription Modules to Identify Expression Clusters Perturbed in Williams-Beuren Syndrome

The genetic dissection of the phenotypes associated with Williams-Beuren Syndrome (WBS) is advancing thanks to the study of individuals carrying typical or atypical structural rearrangements, as well as in vitro and animal studies. However, little is known about the global dysregulations caused by the WBS deletion. We profiled the transcriptomes of skin fibroblasts from WBS patients and compared them to matched controls. We identified 868 differentially expressed genes that were significantly enriched in extracellular matrix genes, major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genes, as well as genes in which the products localize to the postsynaptic membrane. We then used public expression datasets from human fibroblasts to establish transcription modules, sets of genes coexpressed in this cell type. We identified those sets in which the average gene expression was altered in WBS samples. Dysregulated modules are often interconnected and share multiple common genes, suggesting that intricate regulatory networks connected by a few central genes are disturbed in WBS. This modular approach increases the power to identify pathways dysregulated in WBS patients, thus providing a testable set of additional candidates for genes and their interactions that modulate the WBS phenotypes.

[1]  Tim G. Hales,et al.  The promiscuous role of the epsilon subunit in GABAA receptor biogenesis , 2008, Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience.

[2]  Jean YH Yang,et al.  Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics , 2004, Genome Biology.

[3]  C A Morris,et al.  Williams syndrome and related disorders. , 2000, Annual review of genomics and human genetics.

[4]  A Mari,et al.  Detection of an atypical 7q11.23 deletion in Williams syndrome patients which does not include the STX1A and FZD3 genes , 1999, Journal of medical genetics.

[5]  P. Sharpe,et al.  TFII‐I gene family during tooth development: Candidate genes for tooth anomalies in Williams syndrome , 2007, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[6]  Sven Bergmann,et al.  Defining transcription modules using large-scale gene expression data , 2004, Bioinform..

[7]  A Ballabio,et al.  WBSCR14, a gene mapping to the Williams--Beuren syndrome deleted region, is a new member of the Mlx transcription factor network. , 2001, Human molecular genetics.

[8]  C. I. Zeeuw,et al.  Contribution of CYLN2 and GTF2IRD1 to neurological and cognitive symptoms in Williams Syndrome , 2007, Neurobiology of Disease.

[9]  Christian R Marshall,et al.  Infantile spasms is associated with deletion of the MAGI2 gene on chromosome 7q11.23-q21.11. , 2008, American journal of human genetics.

[10]  Fredrik Barrenäs,et al.  Network properties of human disease genes with pleiotropic effects , 2010, BMC Systems Biology.

[11]  R. Borgatti,et al.  Unusual cognitive and behavioural profile in a Williams syndrome patient with atypical 7q11.23 deletion , 2003, Journal of medical genetics.

[12]  Jun Aruga,et al.  Dorz1, a novel gene expressed in differentiating cerebellar granule neurons, is down-regulated in Zic1-deficient mouse. , 2003, Brain research. Molecular brain research.

[13]  Ursula Bellugi,et al.  Defining the social phenotype in Williams syndrome: A model for linking gene, the brain, and behavior , 2008, Development and Psychopathology.

[14]  Webb Miller,et al.  Generation and Comparative Analysis of ∼3.3 Mb of Mouse Genomic Sequence Orthologous to the Region of Human Chromosome 7q11.23 Implicated in Williams Syndrome , 2002 .

[15]  Marleen Verhoye,et al.  Targeted mutation of Cyln2 in the Williams syndrome critical region links CLIP-115 haploinsufficiency to neurodevelopmental abnormalities in mice , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[16]  Patricia Spallone,et al.  Hemizygosity at the elastin locus in a developmental disorder, Williams syndrome , 1993, Nature Genetics.

[17]  Cheng Li,et al.  Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods. , 2007, Biostatistics.

[18]  C. Mervis,et al.  GTF2I hemizygosity implicated in mental retardation in Williams syndrome: Genotype–phenotype analysis of five families with deletions in the Williams syndrome region , 2003, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[19]  C A Morris,et al.  Supravalvular aortic stenosis associated with a deletion disrupting the elastin gene. , 1994, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[20]  A. Karmiloff-Smith,et al.  Using case study comparisons to explore genotype-phenotype correlations in Williams-Beuren syndrome , 2003, Journal of medical genetics.

[21]  Feng Zhang,et al.  Hsp27 Protects against Ischemic Brain Injury via Attenuation of a Novel Stress-Response Cascade Upstream of Mitochondrial Cell Death Signaling , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  Pablo Tamayo,et al.  Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Pascale Bossard,et al.  ChREBP, but not LXRs, is required for the induction of glucose-regulated genes in mouse liver. , 2008, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[24]  M. Newman,et al.  Hierarchical structure and the prediction of missing links in networks , 2008, Nature.

[25]  U. Bellugi,et al.  Is It Williams Syndrome? Gtf2ird1 Implicated in Visual–spatial Construction and Gtf2i in Sociability Revealed by High Resolution Arrays Materials and Methods Subject Deletion Analysis Cognitive-behavioral Analysis Results Physical and Developmental Features Deletion Analysis Neurocognitive Performan , 2022 .

[26]  Alexandre Reymond,et al.  An atypical 7q11.23 deletion in a normal IQ Williams–Beuren syndrome patient , 2010, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[27]  A. Meyer-Lindenberg,et al.  Intermediate phenotypes and genetic mechanisms of psychiatric disorders , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[28]  Charlotte N. Henrichsen,et al.  Side effects of genome structural changes. , 2007, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[29]  Matthieu Latapy,et al.  Efficient and simple generation of random simple connected graphs with prescribed degree sequence , 2005, J. Complex Networks.

[30]  Karl Deisseroth,et al.  Induced chromosome deletions cause hypersociability and other features of Williams–Beuren syndrome in mice , 2009, EMBO molecular medicine.

[31]  Christian von Mering,et al.  STRING 8—a global view on proteins and their functional interactions in 630 organisms , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[32]  C. Fowler,et al.  Williams-Beuren syndrome. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  Alexandre Reymond,et al.  Williams–Beuren syndrome TRIM50 encodes an E3 ubiquitin ligase , 2008, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[34]  A. Selicorni,et al.  Thyroid anomalies in Williams syndrome: Investigation of 95 patients , 2006, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[35]  Donna K. Slonim,et al.  Lack of nAChR Activity Depresses Cochlear Maturation and Up-Regulates GABA System Components: Temporal Profiling of Gene Expression in α9 Null Mice , 2010, PloS one.

[36]  Christophe Fleury,et al.  Uncoupling protein-2: a novel gene linked to obesity and hyperinsulinemia , 1997, Nature Genetics.

[37]  Robert Gentleman,et al.  Bioconductor Case Studies , 2008 .

[38]  Uta Francke,et al.  An atypical deletion of the Williams–Beuren syndrome interval implicates genes associated with defective visuospatial processing and autism , 2006, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[39]  Sven Bergmann,et al.  Modular analysis of gene expression data with R , 2010, Bioinform..

[40]  Katsumi Iizuka,et al.  Carbohydrate response element binding protein directly promotes lipogenic enzyme gene transcription. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  Shuwen Huang,et al.  A novel 2.43 Mb deletion of 7q11.22–q11.23 , 2008, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[42]  C. Fauth,et al.  Partial 7q11.23 deletions further implicate GTF2I and GTF2IRD1 as the main genes responsible for the Williams–Beuren syndrome neurocognitive profile , 2009, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[43]  Alexandre Reymond,et al.  Abnormal social behaviors and altered gene expression rates in a mouse model for Potocki-Lupski syndrome. , 2008, Human molecular genetics.

[44]  Ananda L Roy,et al.  Essential functions of the Williams-Beuren syndrome-associated TFII-I genes in embryonic development , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  Stephen W. Scherer,et al.  A 1.5 million–base pair inversion polymorphism in families with Williams-Beuren syndrome , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[46]  Gábor Csárdi,et al.  The igraph software package for complex network research , 2006 .

[47]  Sven Bergmann,et al.  ExpressionView - an interactive viewer for modules identified in gene expression data , 2010, Bioinform..

[48]  Sven Bergmann,et al.  Iterative signature algorithm for the analysis of large-scale gene expression data. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[49]  S. V. Heesch,et al.  Distribution and functional impact of DNA copy number variation in the rat , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[50]  Peter Hammond,et al.  GTF2IRD1 in Craniofacial Development of Humans and Mice , 2005, Science.

[51]  A. Doll,et al.  Characterization of two novel genes, WBSCR20 and WBSCR22, deleted in Williams-Beuren syndrome , 2002, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[52]  K. Dolinski,et al.  Use and misuse of the gene ontology annotations , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[53]  Takashi Takata,et al.  Effect of F-spondin on cementoblastic differentiation of human periodontal ligament cells. , 2006, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[54]  Zhen Jiang,et al.  Bioconductor Project Bioconductor Project Working Papers Year Paper Extensions to Gene Set Enrichment , 2013 .

[55]  J. Bregman,et al.  Multisystem study of 20 older adults with Williams syndrome , 2004, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[56]  Charlotte N. Henrichsen,et al.  Submicroscopic deletion in patients with Williams-Beuren syndrome influences expression levels of the nonhemizygous flanking genes. , 2006, American journal of human genetics.

[57]  A. Reymond,et al.  Copy number variants, diseases and gene expression. , 2009, Human molecular genetics.

[58]  M. Bayés,et al.  Mutational mechanisms of Williams-Beuren syndrome deletions. , 2003, American journal of human genetics.

[59]  Rumiko Matsuoka,et al.  VI. Genome Structure and Cognitive Map of Williams Syndrome , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[60]  Rumiko Matsuoka,et al.  Williams syndrome deficits in visual spatial processing linked to GTF2IRD1 and GTF2I on Chromosome 7q11.23 , 2003, Genetics in Medicine.

[61]  Alexandre Reymond,et al.  Identification of additional transcripts in the Williams-Beuren syndrome critical region , 2002, Human Genetics.

[62]  R. Redon,et al.  Relative Impact of Nucleotide and Copy Number Variation on Gene Expression Phenotypes , 2007, Science.

[63]  J. Attias,et al.  Hyperactive Auditory Efferent System and Lack of Acoustic Reflexes in Williams Syndrome , 2008, Journal of basic and clinical physiology and pharmacology.

[64]  M. Bayés,et al.  Hemizygosity at the NCF1 gene in patients with Williams-Beuren syndrome decreases their risk of hypertension. , 2006, American journal of human genetics.

[65]  D. Vitkup,et al.  Network properties of genes harboring inherited disease mutations , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[66]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[67]  Alexandre Reymond,et al.  The subcellular localization of the ChoRE-binding protein, encoded by the Williams-Beuren syndrome critical region gene 14, is regulated by 14-3-3. , 2004, Human molecular genetics.

[68]  C. Howald,et al.  Two high throughput technologies to detect segmental aneuploidies identify new Williams-Beuren syndrome patients with atypical deletions , 2005, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[69]  Mireia Vilardell,et al.  Transcriptome profile in Williams–Beuren syndrome lymphoblast cells reveals gene pathways implicated in glucose intolerance and visuospatial construction deficits , 2010, Human Genetics.

[70]  Nam Ho Jeoung,et al.  Carbohydrate-response Element-binding Protein Deletion Alters Substrate Utilization Producing an Energy-deficient Liver* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[71]  C A Morris,et al.  Natural history of Williams syndrome: physical characteristics. , 1988, The Journal of pediatrics.

[72]  Jeffrey W Touchman,et al.  Generation and comparative analysis of approximately 3.3 Mb of mouse genomic sequence orthologous to the region of human chromosome 7q11.23 implicated in Williams syndrome. , 2002, Genome research.

[73]  Roser Corominas,et al.  Copy number variation at the 7q11.23 segmental duplications is a susceptibility factor for the Williams-Beuren syndrome deletion. , 2008, Genome research.

[74]  Colleen A. Morris,et al.  The elastin gene is disrupted by a translocation associated with supravalvular aortic stenosis , 1993, Cell.

[75]  Charlotte N. Henrichsen,et al.  Segmental copy number variation shapes tissue transcriptomes , 2009, Nature Genetics.

[76]  P. Park,et al.  Discovering statistically significant pathways in expression profiling studies. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.