The Accessibility of Computer-based Health Information for Patients: Kiosks and the Web

The Internet is a rich source of health information but it is not as accessible as many claim. This paper brings together three projects to illustrate technical and cost barriers and some options to overcome them. (1) A survey amongst a representative sample of 180 patients in rural Spain showed a marked age gradient in computer access. None over the age of 50 had, and less than 10% planned, access to the Internet whereas a quarter were prepared to use health centre based touchscreen kiosks. (2) Half the commonly used search engines did not include the two most relevant websites for Glasgow colorectal cancer patients in the first ten documents listed, showing the difficulty facing patients in finding relevant information. Selection of information would help patients avoid being overwhelmed with information. (3) One method to improve accessibility is to download websites to kiosks but two projects showed that considerable work is required to reformat the information. Public access computing, such as kiosks, could help make the Internet more accessible. We discuss whether Web sites which structure their information according to method of access, place and person provide a way forward.

[1]  Keith Cheverst,et al.  Providing Tailored (Context-Aware) Information to City Visitors , 2000, AH.

[2]  J C Wyatt,et al.  Commentary: measuring quality and impact of the world wide web , 1997, BMJ.

[3]  George Hripcsak,et al.  A Health Information Network for Managing Innercity Tuberculosis: Bridging Clinical Care, Public Health, and Home Care, , 1999, Comput. Biomed. Res..

[4]  Vikki Entwistle,et al.  Informing patients: an assessment of the quality of patient information materials Informing patients: an assessment of the quality of patient information materials Coulter Angela Entwisde Vikki Gilbert David King's Fund 219pp £16.95 1-85717-2144-0 18571721440. , 1999, Nursing Standard.

[5]  P. Furth,et al.  A pilot study of a headache program in the workplace. The effect of education. , 1999, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[6]  R. Blendon,et al.  Health information, the Internet, and the digital divide. , 2000, Health affairs.

[7]  M. Gillies,et al.  Patient information on cancer , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  Fatima A.M. Al-Barwani The development and evaluation of a patient workstation , 1997 .

[9]  A R Jadad,et al.  Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel? , 1998, JAMA.

[10]  R. Jones,et al.  Use of a community-based touch-screen public-access health information system. , 1993, Health bulletin.

[11]  D Charnock,et al.  DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. , 1999, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[12]  G. Bell,et al.  Where Should a Public Access Health Information System be Sited? , 1993, Interact. Comput..

[13]  B P Bergeron Could your practice use a waiting room kiosk? , 2000, Postgraduate medicine.

[14]  J Pearson,et al.  Randomised trial of personalised computer based information for cancer patients , 1999, BMJ.

[15]  T A Sheldon,et al.  Supporting consumer involvement in decision making: what constitutes quality in consumer health information? , 1996, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[16]  V. Strecher,et al.  Interactive multimedia and risk communication. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[17]  Lynn Naven,et al.  Development and Evaluation of Healthpoint: A Public Access Touch Screen Community-Based Health Information System , 1996 .