Signal Detection and Animal Communication

Publisher Summary This chapter provides an introduction to signal detection theory and its applications in psychophysics, and the objective is to identify general principles for the study of adaptations in animal communication. These principles can clarify the properties of signals that affect a receiver's performance. It also suggests ways to extend the theory to the classification, as well as detection of signals. To apprehend the essential features of signal detection theory, it helps to consider a simple situation. Suppose an individual listens for a conspecific vocalization characterized by some feature, such as a particular frequency. In this case, the signal has a single feature, a particular frequency, which varies along a single dimension, its intensity. The earliest application of signal detection theory to a behavioral problem was the determination of human sensory thresholds. Detectability is a measure of a receiver's ability to separate a signal from background stimulation; the analogous measure of ability to separate two signals is discriminability. Signal detection theory makes it clear that any receiver's performance in detecting or discriminating signals has limits. Although in many situations it is reasonable to assume that an animal's task involves no more than detection of an appropriate signal, in others some classification of a stimulus is essential. Signal detection theory describes decisions based on the outputs of perceptual channels. Detection and discrimination, the focus of discussion so far, suggest that the perceptual channels under consideration are sensory receptors and their immediate neural connections. Signal detection theory suggests ways that receivers and signalers could coevolve. Signal detection theory involves a level of abstraction unfamiliar in field studies of animal communication. In all of these ways, signal detection theory can advance our understanding of both the physiology and the evolution of communication.

[1]  Marilyn L Shaw,et al.  Attending to multiple sources of information: I. The integration of information in decision making , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  A. Horn,et al.  Ambient noise and the design of begging signals , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  D. Kroodsma,et al.  Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds , 1997 .

[4]  Hans Winkler,et al.  Vertical lek placement of forest-dwelling manakin species (Aves, Pipridae) is associated with vertical gradients of ambient light , 2003 .

[5]  H. Brumm The impact of environmental noise on song amplitude in a territorial bird , 2004 .

[6]  John A. Swets,et al.  Repeated observation of an uncertain signal , 1978 .

[7]  R. R. Mackie,et al.  Vigilance: Theory, Operational Performance, and Physiological Correlates , 1978 .

[8]  J. Endler The Color of Light in Forests and Its Implications , 1993 .

[9]  R. Haven Wiley,et al.  Background noise from a natural chorus alters female discrimination of male calls in a Neotropical frog , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  James P. Egan,et al.  Interval of Time Uncertainty in Auditory Detection , 1961 .

[11]  J. Endler,et al.  Interacting Effects of Lek Placement, Display Behavior, Ambient Light, and Color Patterns in Three Neotropical Forest-Dwelling Birds , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[12]  T E Cohn,et al.  Detection of 1-of-M orthogonal signals: asymptotic equivalence of likelihood ratio and multiband models. , 1978, Optics letters.

[13]  G. Klump,et al.  Signal detection in amplitude‐modulated maskers. I. Behavioural auditory thresholds in a songbird , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[14]  Marc Naguib,et al.  Estimating the distance to a source of sound: mechanisms and adaptations for long-range communication , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  M. P. Friedman,et al.  HANDBOOK OF PERCEPTION , 1977 .

[16]  Broadbent De Word-frequency effect and response bias. , 1967 .

[17]  James P. Egan,et al.  Operating Characteristics, Signal Detectability, and the Method of Free Response , 1961 .

[18]  T. Guilford,et al.  Receiver psychology and the design of animal signals , 1993, Trends in Neurosciences.

[19]  John T. Wixted,et al.  Methodology in experimental psychology , 2002 .

[20]  J. Cynx,et al.  Amplitude regulation of vocalizations in noise by a songbird,Taeniopygia guttata , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  Thierry Aubin,et al.  Cocktail–party effect in king penguin colonies , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  M. Théry,et al.  Influence of ambient light on the evolution of colour signals: comparative analysis of a Neotropical rainforest bird community , 2004 .

[23]  J. Endler,et al.  Modification of the visual background increases the conspicuousness of golden-collared manakin displays , 2004 .

[24]  O. Seehausen,et al.  Cichlid Fish Diversity Threatened by Eutrophication That Curbs Sexual Selection , 1997 .

[25]  D. Papaj,et al.  PEAK SHIFT DISCRIMINATION LEARNING AS A MECHANISM OF SIGNAL EVOLUTION , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[26]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  Psychological Processes in Sustained Attention , 1977 .

[27]  Patrick Bateson,et al.  SEXUAL SELECTION: THE EVOLUTION OF CONSPICUOUS CHARACTERISTICS IN BIRDS BY MEANS OF IMPRINTING , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[28]  S. Penrod,et al.  Meta-analysis of facial identification studies. , 1986 .

[29]  Douglas G. Richards,et al.  ESTIMATION OF DISTANCE OF SINGING CONSPECIFICS BY THE CAROLINA WREN , 1981 .

[30]  A. Nieder,et al.  Signal detection in amplitude‐modulated maskers. II. Processing in the songbird's auditory forebrain , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[31]  H. Rubenstein,et al.  Intelligibility of Known and Unknown Message Sets , 1959 .

[32]  D G Pelli,et al.  Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[33]  Neil A. Macmillan Signal Detection Theory , 2002 .

[34]  Andrew P Yonelinas,et al.  Dissociating familiarity from recollection using rote rehearsal , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[35]  E. C. Cherry Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears , 1953 .

[36]  N. Macmillan,et al.  Response bias : characteristics of detection theory, threshold theory, and nonparametric indexes , 1990 .

[37]  D L Weber,et al.  Detection and recognition of pure tones in noise. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  Anil Kumar,et al.  Acoustic communication in birds , 2003 .

[39]  R. H. Wiley Associations of Song Properties with Habitats for Territorial Oscine Birds of Eastern North America , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[40]  L. Reder,et al.  A dual-process account of the list-length and strength-based mirror effects in recognition , 2003 .

[41]  D. M. Green,et al.  Detection and recognition. , 1978 .

[42]  R M Mulligan,et al.  Multimodal signal detection: Independent decisions vs. integration , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[43]  A. Yonelinas The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research , 2002 .

[44]  Douglas G. Richards,et al.  Alerting and Message Components in Songs of Rufous-Sided Towhees , 1981 .

[45]  D. Todt,et al.  Acoustic communication in noise: regulation of call characteristics in a New World monkey , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[46]  D. R. Davies,et al.  Human vigilance performance , 1969 .

[47]  Don McNicol,et al.  A Primer of Signal Detection Theory , 1976 .

[48]  M Glanzer,et al.  The mirror effect in recognition memory , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[49]  C. Metz,et al.  Visual detection and localization of radiographic images. , 1975, Radiology.

[50]  Robert J. Dooling,et al.  4 – Auditory Perception in Birds , 1982 .

[51]  G. Klump,et al.  Comodulation masking release in a songbird , 1995, Hearing Research.

[52]  M. Enquist,et al.  Selection of exaggerated male traits by female aesthetic senses , 1993, Nature.

[53]  T E Cohn,et al.  Detection and recognition of visual targets. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[54]  M. Loeb,et al.  The Psychology of Vigilance , 1982 .

[55]  J. Pierce SOME SOURCES OF ARTIFACT IN STUDIES OF THE TACHISTOSCOPIC PERCEPTION OF WORDS. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.

[56]  R. Luce,et al.  A threshold theory for simple detection experiments. , 1963, Psychological review.

[57]  W. K. Taylor,et al.  Some Further Experiments upon the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears , 1954 .

[58]  N A Macmillan,et al.  Detection theory analysis of group data: estimating sensitivity from average hit and false-alarm rates. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[59]  D. Broadbent Perception and communication , 1958 .

[60]  Chuan Yi Tang,et al.  A 2.|E|-Bit Distributed Algorithm for the Directed Euler Trail Problem , 1993, Inf. Process. Lett..

[61]  David M. Green,et al.  Detection of Auditory Sinusoids of Uncertain Frequency , 1961 .

[62]  James P. Egan,et al.  Operating Characteristics Determined by Binary Decisions and by Ratings , 1959 .

[63]  J. Endler On the measurement and classification of colour in studies of animal colour patterns , 1990 .

[64]  Wilson P. Tanner,et al.  Theory of recognition. , 1956 .

[65]  John A. Swets,et al.  The human use of information-I: Signal detection for the case of the signal known exactly , 1954, Trans. IRE Prof. Group Inf. Theory.

[66]  D. Weary,et al.  A PRODUCT OF DISCRIMINATIVE LEARNING MAY LEAD TO FEMALE PREFERENCES FOR ELABORATE MALES , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[67]  D. M. Green,et al.  Multiple Observations of Signals in Noise , 1959 .

[68]  Dietmar Todt,et al.  Noise-dependent song amplitude regulation in a territorial songbird , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[69]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Fluid dynamics: Vortex rings in a constant electric field , 2003, Nature.

[70]  J P Thomas,et al.  Detection and identification: how are they related? , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[71]  P F Judy,et al.  Detection of noisy visual targets: Models for the effects of spatial uncertainty and signal-to-noise ratio , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[72]  Earl A. Alluisi,et al.  An Update of Findings Regarding Vigilance and a Reconsideration of Underlying Mechanisms , 1977 .

[73]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Chapter 9 – DETECTION, DISCRIMINATION, AND RECOGNITION* , 1974 .

[74]  M. Glanzer,et al.  The regularities of recognition memory. , 1993, Psychological review.

[75]  Marc Naguib,et al.  Reverberation of rapid and slow trills: implications for signal adaptations to long-range communication. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[76]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[77]  S A Klein,et al.  Double-judgment psychophysics: problems and solutions. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[78]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[79]  C S Watson,et al.  Detectability of auditory signals presented without defined observation intervals. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[80]  T. Guilford,et al.  Receiver psychology and the evolution of animal signals , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[81]  L. Real,et al.  Behavioral Mechanisms in Evolutionary Ecology , 1995 .

[82]  David Jaarsma,et al.  More on the Detection of One of M Orthogonal Signals , 1967 .

[83]  Paul Eelen Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology (third edition) , 2003 .

[84]  U LANGEMANN,et al.  Auditory sensitivity in the great tit: perception of signals in the presence and absence of noise , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[85]  Eliot A. Brenowitz The active space of red-winged blackbird song , 1982, Journal of comparative physiology.