Somatosensory discrimination based on cortical microstimulation

The sensation of flutter is produced when mechanical vibrations in the range of 5–50 Hz are applied to the skin. A flutter stimulus activates neurons in the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) that somatotopically map to the site of stimulation,. A subset of these neurons — those with quickly adapting properties, associated with Meissner's corpuscles — are strongly entrained by periodic flutter vibrations, firing with a probability that oscillates at the input frequency,. Hence, quickly adapting neurons provide a dynamic representation of such flutter stimuli. However, are these neurons directly involved in the perception of flutter? Here we investigate this in monkeys trained to discriminate the difference in frequency between two flutter stimuli delivered sequentially on the fingertips,. Microelectrodes were inserted into area 3b of S1 and the second stimulus was substituted with a train of injected current pulses. Animals reliably indicated whether the frequency of the second (electrical) signal was higher or lower than that of the first (mechanical) signal, even though both frequencies changed from trial to trial. Almost identical results were obtained with periodic and aperiodic stimuli of equal average frequencies. Thus, the quickly adapting neurons in area 3b activate the circuit leading to the perception of flutter. Furthermore, as far as can be psychophysically quantified during discrimination, the neural code underlying the sensation of fluttercan be finely manipulated, to the extent that the behavioural responses produced by natural and artificial stimuli are indistinguishable.

[1]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[2]  V. Mountcastle Modality and topographic properties of single neurons of cat's somatic sensory cortex. , 1957, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  Some aspects of the functional organization of the cortex of the postcentral gyrus of the monkey: a correlation of findings obtained in a single unit analysis with cytoarchitecture. , 1959, Bulletin of the Johns Hopkins Hospital.

[4]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  The sense of flutter-vibration: comparison of the human capacity with response patterns of mechanoreceptive afferents from the monkey hand. , 1968, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  J. Hyvärinen,et al.  Cortical neuronal mechanisms in flutter-vibration studied in unanesthetized monkeys. Neuronal periodicity and frequency discrimination. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  Capacities of humans and monkeys to discriminate vibratory stimuli of different frequency and amplitude: a correlation between neural events and psychological measurements. , 1975, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  J. G. Chirikjian,et al.  DNA polymerase with characteristics of reverse transcriptase purified from human milk. , 1979, Science.

[8]  R H LaMotte,et al.  Disorders in somesthesis following lesions of parietal lobe. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  J. Kaas,et al.  Multiple representations of the body within the primary somatosensory cortex of primates. , 1979, Science.

[10]  M Sur,et al.  Modular distribution of neurons with slowly adapting and rapidly adapting responses in area 3b of somatosensory cortex in monkeys. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  William T. Newsome,et al.  Cortical microstimulation influences perceptual judgements of motion direction , 1990, Nature.

[12]  R. Romo,et al.  Frequency discrimination in the sense of flutter: psychophysical measurements correlated with postcentral events in behaving monkeys , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[13]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  Adaptation of the Reitboeck method of multiple microelectrode recording to the neocortex of the waking monkey , 1991, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[14]  G. Recanzone,et al.  Changes in the distributed temporal response properties of SI cortical neurons reflect improvements in performance on a temporally based tactile discrimination task. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  W. Newsome,et al.  Microstimulation in visual area MT: effects on direction discrimination performance , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  Z. Dong,et al.  A nearly complete skeleton of a new troodontid dinosaur from the Early Cretaceous of the Ordos Basin, Inner Mongolia, People's Republic of China , 1993 .

[17]  Harold N. Bryant,et al.  The occurrence of clavicles within Dinosauria: Implications for the homology of the avian furcula and the utility of negative evidence , 1993 .

[18]  Thomas R. Holtz,et al.  The phylogenetic position of the Tyrannosauridae: implications for theropod systematics , 1994, Journal of Paleontology.

[19]  K. H. Britten,et al.  Power spectrum analysis of bursting cells in area MT in the behaving monkey , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[20]  James M. Clark,et al.  A Theropod Dinosaur Embryo and the Affinities of the Flaming Cliffs Dinosaur Eggs , 1994, Science.

[21]  E. Bizzi,et al.  The Cognitive Neurosciences , 1996 .

[22]  A. Kellner Fossilized theropod soft tissue , 1996, Nature.

[23]  Emilio Salinas,et al.  Discrimination in the Sense of Flutter: New Psychophysical Measurements in Monkeys , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  Emilio Salinas,et al.  Role of primary somatic sensory cortex in the categorization of tactile stimuli: effects of lesions , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.