A measurement model for general noise reaction in response to aircraft noise.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. Larson. The MOS 36-Item Short form Health Survey , 1997, Evaluation & the health professions.
[2] P. Bentler,et al. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.
[3] Maarten Kroesen,et al. Policy discourse, people's internal frames, and declared aircraft noise annoyance: an application of Q-methodology. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[4] P Weindling,et al. Psychiatry and the Holocaust , 1992, Psychological Medicine.
[5] T. J. Schultz. Synthesis of social surveys on noise annoyance. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[6] R. Guski,et al. THE CONCEPT OF NOISE ANNOYANCE: HOW INTERNATIONAL EXPERTS SEE IT , 1999 .
[7] M. Kroesen,et al. Testing a theory of aircraft noise annoyance: a structural equation analysis. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[8] M Sullivan,et al. The factor structure of the SF-36 Health Survey in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[9] John Black,et al. Aircraft noise exposure and resident's stress and hypertension: A public health perspective for airport environmental management , 2007 .
[10] R. Bagozzi,et al. A General Approach for Representing Constructs in Organizational Research , 1998 .
[11] Federica Vigna-Taglianti,et al. Association between noise annoyance and high blood pressure. Preliminary results from the HYENA study , 2007 .
[12] K. Dimakopoulou,et al. Acute effects of night-time noise exposure on blood pressure in populations living near airports. , 2008, European heart journal.
[13] J. Ware,et al. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. , 1996, Medical care.
[14] J. Hatfield,et al. The influence of psychological factors on self-reported physiological effects of noise. , 2001, Noise & health.
[15] R. P. McDonald,et al. Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .
[16] H. Vos,et al. Demographic and attitudinal factors that modify annoyance from transportation noise , 1999 .
[17] A Alexandre,et al. An assessment of certain causal models used in surveys on aircraft noise annoyance , 1976 .
[18] Sanford Fidell,et al. UPDATING A DOSAGE-EFFECT RELATIONSHIP FOR THE PREVALENCE OF ANNOYANCE DUE TO GENERAL TRANSPORTATION NOISE , 1991 .
[19] D. Watson. Intraindividual and interindividual analyses of positive and negative affect: their relation to health complaints, perceived stress, and daily activities. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[20] U. Ahrlin. Activity disturbances caused by different environmental noises , 1988 .
[21] J. Edwards. Multidimensional Constructs in Organizational Behavior Research: An Integrative Analytical Framework , 2001 .
[22] R. Wiggins,et al. The effect of aircraft noise on the mental health of a community sample: a pilot study , 1978, Psychological Medicine.
[23] P M Bentler,et al. Use of structural equation modeling to test the construct validity of the SF-36 Health Survey in ten countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[24] J. Ware,et al. Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[25] R. Guski. Personal and social variables as co-determinants of noise annoyance. , 1999, Noise & health.
[26] Theodore J. Schultz. Erratum: ’’Synthesis of social surveys on noise annoyance’’ [ J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 64, 377−405 (l968)] , 1979 .
[27] Kenneth S. Law,et al. Toward A Taxonomy of Multidimensional Constructs , 1998 .
[28] F. Bookstein,et al. Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory , 1982 .
[29] R. Lennox,et al. Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. , 1991 .
[30] M. Browne,et al. Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .
[31] S. M. Taylor,et al. A path model of aircraft noise annoyance , 1984 .
[32] Takashi Yano,et al. STANDARDIZED GENERAL-PURPOSE NOISE REACTION QUESTIONS FOR COMMUNITY NOISE SURVEYS: RESEARCH AND A RECOMMENDATION , 2001 .
[33] D. Flora,et al. An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. , 2004, Psychological methods.
[34] Karl D. Kryter. Community annoyance from aircraft and ground vehicle noise , 1982 .
[35] J. Duyvendak,et al. Discursive opportunities, feeling rules and the rise of protests against aircraft noise , 2009 .
[36] R.F.S. Job,et al. The influence of subjective reactions to noise on health effects of the noise , 1996 .
[37] Raphael Feinmesser,et al. Noise-induced vestibular dysfunction. , 2000, Noise & health.
[38] Fred L. Hall,et al. Activity interference and noise annoyance , 1985 .
[39] Sarah D. Pressman,et al. CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Positive Affect and Health , 2022 .
[40] M. Browne. Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. , 1984, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.
[41] Cheryl Burke Jarvis,et al. A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research , 2003 .
[42] P. Lercher. Environmental noise and health: An integrated research perspective , 1996 .
[43] S. Stansfeld,et al. Noise, noise sensitivity and psychiatric disorder: epidemiological and psychophysiological studies. , 1993, Psychological medicine.
[44] H. Rüddel,et al. Traffic noise and hypertension: An epidemiological study on the role of subjective reactions , 1983, International archives of occupational and environmental health.
[45] P. Bentler,et al. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .
[46] R. F. Job,et al. General scales of community reaction to noise (dissatisfaction and perceived affectedness) are more reliable than scales of annoyance. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.