Evaluating Multiple Perspectives of a Connected Health Ecosystem

Connected Health is an emerging model of care that engages technology to improve patient care and (re)habilitation. It encourages self-efficacy by developing client-centred care pathways and evidence-based interventions to reduce the need for hospital-led care and empower patients in their homes. It also promotes improved ‘connectivity’ between healthcare stakeholders by means of timely sharing and presentation of accurate and pertinent information about patient status. Connected Health initiatives can achieve this through smarter use of data, devices, communication platforms and people. However, there are few efforts which have established an evaluation model to encapsulate and assess the value and potential impact of Connected Health solutions from multiple stakeholders’ perspectives. We examined information systems (IS) and health information systems (HIS) literature to identify whether a model could apply to Connected Health. However, many of the evaluation models are narrow in focus but have influenced our development of the Connected Health Evaluation Framework (CHEF). CHEF offers a generic approach which encapsulates a holistic view of a Connected Health evaluation process. It focuses on four key domains: end-user perception, business growth, quality management and healthcare practice.

[1]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  Evaluating informatics applications - some alternative approaches: theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism , 2001, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[2]  Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk,et al.  Transforming health care from the inside out: advancing evidence-based practice in the 21st century. , 2005, Journal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing.

[3]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  Review: Addressing Organizational Issues into the Evaluation of Medical Systems , 1997, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[4]  Neil Postman,et al.  Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology , 1993 .

[5]  Michael T French,et al.  Economic evaluation of telemedicine: review of the literature and research guidelines for benefit-cost analysis. , 2009, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[6]  Barbara Korabek,et al.  Stakeholder readiness for telehomecare: implications for implementation. , 2004, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[7]  Sofie Verbrugge,et al.  Economic Viability of eCare Solutions , 2010, eHealth.

[8]  Ray J. Paul,et al.  Towards a Framework for Health Information Systems Evaluation , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[9]  J. Kvedar,et al.  Connected health: a new framework for evaluation of communication technology use in care improvement strategies for type 2 diabetes. , 2007, Current diabetes reviews.

[10]  David L Damm-Luhr ADDRESSING ORGANIZATIONAL ISSUES. , 1984 .

[11]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Andrew Grant,et al.  The TEAM methodology for the evaluation of information systems in biomedicine , 2002, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[13]  Spencer S Jones,et al.  The value of health information technology: filling the knowledge gap. , 2014, The American journal of managed care.

[14]  L. Schwamm Telehealth: seven strategies to successfully implement disruptive technology and transform health care. , 2014, Health affairs.

[15]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[16]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Delivering quality service : balancing customer perceptions and expectations , 1990 .

[17]  Noel Carroll,et al.  In Search We Trust: Exploring How Search Engines are Shaping Society , 2014, Int. J. Knowl. Soc. Res..

[18]  S. Donnelly,et al.  Review Series – Connected Health What is Connected Health and why will it change your practice? , 2013 .

[19]  D. R. Dixon,et al.  The behavioral side of information technology , 1999, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[20]  J. De,et al.  Will disruptive innovations cure health care , 2000 .

[21]  K. Bowles,et al.  Cost analysis of telehomecare. , 2001, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[22]  Nicola T. Shaw,et al.  'CHEATS': a generic information communication technology (ICT) evaluation framework , 2002, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[23]  K. Kuhn,et al.  From hospital information systems to health information systems. Problems, challenges, perspectives. , 2001, Methods of information in medicine.

[24]  Joann G. Elmore,et al.  Evaluating the impact of patients' online access to doctors' visit notes: designing and executing the OpenNotes project , 2012, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[25]  M. Musen,et al.  Handbook of Medical Informatics , 2002 .

[26]  Joann G Elmore,et al.  Inviting Patients to Read Their Doctors' Notes: A Quasi-experimental Study and a Look Ahead , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[27]  R. Hanka,et al.  Evaluating information technology in health care: barriers and challenges , 1998, BMJ.

[28]  Stephen Strum,et al.  Inviting patients to read doctors' notes. , 2012, Annals of internal medicine.

[29]  Neil Postman,et al.  Building a Bridge to the 18th Century: How the Past Can Improve Our Future , 1999 .

[30]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[31]  Michael Meltsner A Patient's View of OpenNotes , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[32]  Haitham W Tuffaha,et al.  Value of information analysis in healthcare: a review of principles and applications , 2014, Journal of medical economics.

[33]  Gianluca Misuraca,et al.  From Practice to Theory and back to Practice: Reflexivity in Measurement and Evaluation for Evidence-based Policy Making in the Information Society , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[34]  Marie-Pierre Gagnon,et al.  A systematic review of the key indicators for assessing telehomecare cost-effectiveness. , 2008, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[35]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[36]  E. Vance Wilson,et al.  Interdisciplinary Research and Publication Opportunites in Information Systems and Health Care , 2004, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Chris D Nugent,et al.  Evaluation of connected health technology. , 2012, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[38]  Noel Carroll,et al.  Untangling the Complexity of Connected Health Evaluations , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Healthcare Informatics.

[39]  Noel Carroll,et al.  The Practitioner's Perspective on Clinical Pathway Support Systems , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics.