Adaptive Gain Modification of the Blink Reflex

A reflex blink results from the interaction of only three forces: ( 1 ) an active upward force produced by the tonically active levator palpebrae muscle, which elevates the upper eyelid; (2) an active downward force created by the normally quiescent orbicularis oculi (00) muscle, which closes the eyelid; and (3) an intrinsic, passive downward force, which acts to pull the upper eyelid down. During a blink the levator palpebrae relaxes and the 00 transiently contracts, rapidly lowering the eyelid. As the 00 returns to its quiescent state, the levator palpebrae resumes its tonic activity, overcoming the passive downward tension and slowly raising the eyelid. (For a review see refs. 1-3.) Despite the mechanical and neuronal simplicity of reflex blinks, they manifest many characteristics of more complex motor systems? One such characteristic is the ability of the blink reflex to undergo adaptive gain modification. Adaptive gain changes occur when the nervous system alters the relation between the magnitude of a stimulus and the amplitude of the ensuing reflex to compensate for persistent perturbations that modify the normal response. These gain changes can either increase or decrease the amplitude of the movement, depending on the perturbation. Saccadic eye movements, a much more complex motor behavior than blinking, illustrate this form of motor learning.' Presentation of a target 10 degrees eccentric to the point of fixation normally elicits a 10-degree saccadic eye movement. However, if the investigator presents this stimulus and then shifts the target to a point 14 degrees eccentric during the saccadic eye movement, the eye will fall 4 degrees short of the target. If this target shift is done repeatedly, the saccadic system begins to compensate by producing a 14-degree saccade when presented with a target 10 degrees eccentric. Thus, the adaptive gain change recalibrates the relation between stimulus magnitude and the ensuing motor response so as to bring the movement-evoking input and the motor output back into register.

[1]  Richard F. Thompson The neural basis of basic associative learning of discrete behavioral responses , 1988, Trends in Neurosciences.

[2]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  Cerebellar nucleus lesions dissociate alpha conditioning from alpha responses in rabbits , 1988, Psychobiology.

[3]  L H Snyder,et al.  Vertical vestibuloocular reflex in cat: asymmetry and adaptation. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  D. D. Del Toro,et al.  Corneal sensory pathway in the rat: A horseradish peroxidase tracing study , 1987, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[5]  J. Byrne Cellular analysis of associative learning. , 1987, Physiological reviews.

[6]  F A Miles,et al.  Short-latency ocular following responses of monkey. III. Plasticity. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Richard F. Thompson The neurobiology of learning and memory. , 1986, Science.

[8]  S G Lisberger,et al.  Vestibular signals carried by pathways subserving plasticity of the vestibulo-ocular reflex in monkeys , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  C. Evinger,et al.  Blinking and associated eye movements in humans, guinea pigs, and rabbits. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  S G Lisberger,et al.  The latency of pathways containing the site of motor learning in the monkey vestibulo-ocular reflex. , 1984, Science.

[11]  J. K. Harting,et al.  Studies of the principal sensory and spinal trigeminal nuclei of the rat: Projections to the superior colliculus, inferior olive, and cerebellum , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[12]  N. C. Campbell,et al.  The olivocerebellar projection in the rat: An autoradiographic study , 1983, Brain Research.

[13]  N. C. Campbell,et al.  Topographical localization in the olivocerebellar projection in the rat: An autoradiographic study , 1983, Brain Research.

[14]  L. Optican,et al.  Cerebellar-dependent adaptive control of primate saccadic system. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  L E Mays,et al.  Saccades are spatially, not retinocentrically, coded. , 1980, Science.

[16]  G. M. Shambes,et al.  Fractured somatotopy in granule cell tactile areas of rat cerebellar hemispheres revealed by micromapping. , 1978, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[17]  D. Armstrong,et al.  An investigation of the cerebellar corticonuclear projections in the rat using an autoradiographic tracing method. II. Projections from the hemisphere , 1978, Brain Research.

[18]  M. V. Van Allen,et al.  Electromyographic study of reciprocal innervation in blinking , 1962, Neurology.

[19]  E. Kugelberg,et al.  The electrical activity of the muscles of the eye and eyelids in various positions and during movement. , 1953, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[20]  A. Sterr,et al.  Neurobiology of learning and memory , 2008 .

[21]  Michael Davis The Mammalian Startle Response , 1984 .

[22]  C. Watson,et al.  Organization of the olivocerebellar projection in the rat. , 1983, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[23]  S. Furber,et al.  Organization of the Olivocerebellar Projection in the Rat (Part 1 of 2) , 1983 .

[24]  M. Ito Cerebellar control of the vestibulo-ocular reflex--around the flocculus hypothesis. , 1982, Annual review of neuroscience.

[25]  F. A. Miles,et al.  Plasticity in the vestibulo-ocular reflex: a new hypothesis. , 1981, Annual review of neuroscience.