Factors influencing the accuracy of biomechanical breast models.

Recently it has been suggested that finite element methods could be used to predict breast deformations in a number of applications, including comparison of multimodality images, validation of image registration and image guided interventions. Unfortunately knowledge of the mechanical properties of breast tissues is limited. This study evaluated the accuracy with which biomechanical breast models based on finite element methods can predict the displacements of tissue within the breast in the practical clinical situation where the boundaries of the organ might be known reasonably accurately but there is some uncertainty on the mechanical properties of the tissue. For two datasets, we investigate the influence of tissue elasticity values, Poisson's ratios, boundary conditions, finite element solvers and mesh resolutions. Magnetic resonance images were acquired before and after compressing each volunteer's breast by about 20%. Surface displacement boundary conditions were derived from a three-dimensional nonrigid image registration. Six linear and three nonlinear elastic material models with and without skin were tested. These were compared to hyperelastic models. The accuracy of the models was evaluated by assessing the ability of the model to predict the location of 12 corresponding anatomical landmarks. The accuracy was most sensitive to the Poisson's ratio and the boundary condition. Best results were achieved for accurate boundary conditions, appropriate Poisson's ratios and models where fibroglandular tissue was at most four times stiffer than fatty tissue. These configurations reduced the mean (maximum) distance of the landmarks from 6.6 mm (12.4 mm) to 2.1 mm (3.4 mm) averaged over all experiments.

[1]  G Wang,et al.  ImageParser: a tool for finite element generation from three-dimensional medical images , 2004, Biomedical engineering online.

[2]  David Gavaghan,et al.  Predicting Tumour Location by Simulating Large Deformations of the Breast Using a 3D Finite Element Model and Nonlinear Elasticity , 2004, MICCAI.

[3]  Michael I. Miga,et al.  Modality independent elastography (MIE): a new approach to elasticity imaging , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  John B Weaver,et al.  Initial in vivo experience with steady‐state subzone‐based MR elastography of the human breast , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  Nicole V. Ruiter,et al.  Finite Element Simulation of the Breast's Deformation during Mammography to Generate a Deformation Model for Registration , 2003, Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin.

[6]  R Sinkus,et al.  MR elastography of the breast:preliminary clinical results. , 2002, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[7]  A. Manduca,et al.  MR elastography of breast cancer: preliminary results. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  Derek L. G. Hill,et al.  Comparison of biomechanical breast models: a case study , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[9]  Martin O. Leach,et al.  A method for the comparison of biomechanical breast models , 2001, Proceedings IEEE Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis (MMBIA 2001).

[10]  Dimitris N. Metaxas,et al.  Methods for Modeling and Predicting Mechanical Deformations of the Breast Under External Perturbations , 2001, MICCAI.

[11]  Jonathan Bishop,et al.  A constrained modulus reconstruction technique for breast cancer assessment , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  Validation of Non-rigid Registration Using Finite Element Methods , 2001, IPMI.

[13]  K D Paulsen,et al.  Three‐dimensional subzone‐based reconstruction algorithm for MR elastography , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  Martin J. Yaffe,et al.  Biomechanical 3-D finite element modeling of the human breast using MRI data , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Dimitris N. Metaxas,et al.  A finite element model of the breast for predicting mechanical deformations during biopsy procedures , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis. MMBIA-2000 (Cat. No.PR00737).

[16]  R. Sinkus,et al.  High-resolution tensor MR elastography for breast tumour detection. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  3D Image Matching Using a Finite Element Based Elastic Deformation Model , 1999, MICCAI.

[18]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  Armando Manduca,et al.  Assessment of Breast Cancer by Magnetic Resonance Elastography , 1999 .

[20]  Colin Studholme,et al.  An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment , 1999, Pattern Recognit..

[21]  T. Krouskop,et al.  Elastic Moduli of Breast and Prostate Tissues under Compression , 1998, Ultrasonic imaging.

[22]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[23]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Principal Warps: Thin-Plate Splines and the Decomposition of Deformations , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..