Diminishing parochialism in intergroup conflict by disrupting the right temporo-parietal junction.

Individuals react to violation of social norms by outgroup members differently than to transgressions of those same norms by ingroup members: namely outgroup perpetrators are punished much more harshly than ingroup perpetrators. This parochial punishment pattern has been observed and extensively studied in social psychology and behavioral economics. Despite progress in recent years, however, little is known about the neural underpinnings of this intergroup bias. Here, we demonstrate by means of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) that the transient disruption of the right, but not the left temporo-parietal junction (TPJ), reduces parochial punishment in a third-party punishment paradigm with real social groups. Moreover, we show that this observed TMS effect on parochial punishment is mediated by a classical punishment motive, i.e. retaliation. Finally, our data suggests that a change in perspective-taking might be the underlying mechanism that explains the impact of right TPJ disruption on retaliation motivation and parochial punishment. These findings provide the first causal evidence that the right TPJ plays a pivotal role in the implementation of parochial behaviors.

[1]  J. Jost,et al.  Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among african americans and european americans , 2000 .

[2]  R. Saxe,et al.  Disruption of the right temporoparietal junction with transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces the role of beliefs in moral judgments , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Mark Levine,et al.  Identity and Emergency Intervention: How Social Group Membership and Inclusiveness of Group Boundaries Shape Helping Behavior , 2005, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[4]  S. Rossi,et al.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[5]  Matthew D. Lieberman,et al.  Ascribing beliefs to ingroup and outgroup political candidates: neural correlates of perspective-taking, issue importance and days until the election , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Social categorization and intergroup behaviour , 1971 .

[7]  Henrik Walter,et al.  Side Effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Biased Task Performance in a Cognitive Neuroscience Study , 2005, Brain Topography.

[8]  Avner Ben-Ner,et al.  Identity and in-group/out-group differentiation in work and giving behaviors: Experimental evidence , 2009 .

[9]  M. Perugini,et al.  The personal norm of reciprocity , 2003 .

[10]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  The Evolution of Norms , 2005, PLoS biology.

[11]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Optimizing Functional Accuracy of TMS in Cognitive Studies: A Comparison of Methods , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  Valerie Treyer,et al.  Time-course of “off-line” prefrontal rTMS effects — a PET study , 2008, NeuroImage.

[13]  U. Fischbacher.  z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments , 1999 .

[14]  Ernst Fehr,et al.  Parochial altruism in humans , 2006, Nature.

[15]  Yan Chen,et al.  Group Identity and Social Preferences , 2009 .

[16]  S. Holm.  A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[17]  Michael R. Healy,et al.  Ingroup Bias and Self-Esteem: A Meta-Analysis , 2000 .

[18]  F. Overwalle.  Social cognition and the brain: a meta-analysis. , 2009 .

[19]  Jonathan Bendor,et al.  The Evolution of Norms1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Mapping the moral domain. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  Social norms and human cooperation , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  M. Gollwitzer,et al.  A Closer Look at an Eye for an Eye: Laypersons’ Punishment Decisions Are Primarily Driven by Retributive Motives , 2010 .

[23]  C. Frith,et al.  Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’ , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  A. Hayes.  Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[25]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Both sides retaliate in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  E. Fehr,et al.  The mentalizing network orchestrates the impact of parochial altruism on social norm enforcement , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[27]  S. Fiske,et al.  Dehumanizing the Lowest of the Low , 2006, Psychological science.

[28]  Jonathan B Freeman,et al.  The neural origins of superficial and individuated judgments about ingroup and outgroup members , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[29]  K. Preuschoff,et al.  Neural Responses to Ingroup and Outgroup Members' Suffering Predict Individual Differences in Costly Helping , 2010, Neuron.

[30]  E. Fehr,et al.  Dorsolateral and ventromedial prefrontal cortex orchestrate normative choice , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  Tokiko Harada,et al.  Neural basis of extraordinary empathy and altruistic motivation , 2010, NeuroImage.

[32]  B. Rockenbach,et al.  Egalitarianism in young children , 2008, Nature.

[33]  M. Brewer.  The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate? , 1999 .

[34]  M. Gollwitzer,et al.  Justice sensitivity : assessment and location in the personality space , 2004 .

[35]  S. Meier,et al.  The Impact of Group Membership on Cooperation and Norm Enforcement: Evidence Using Random Assignment to Real Social Groups , 2006, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[36]  Rebecca Saxe,et al.  Attitudes towards the outgroup are predicted by activity in the precuneus in Arabs and Israelis , 2010, NeuroImage.

[37]  S. Bowles.  Did Warfare Among Ancestral Hunter-Gatherers Affect the Evolution of Human Social Behaviors? , 2009, Science.

[38]  R. Koopmans,et al.  Collective action in culturally similar and dissimilar groups: an experiment on parochialism, conditional cooperation, and their linkages ☆,☆☆ , 2009 .

[39]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[40]  Frank Van Overwalle,et al.  A dissociation between social mentalizing and general reasoning , 2011, NeuroImage.

[41]  Emery N. Brown,et al.  Distinct Regions of Right Temporo-Parietal Junction Are Selective for Theory of Mind and Exogenous Attention , 2009, PloS one.

[42]  N. Branscombe,et al.  Sports fans: Measuring degree of identification with their team. , 1993 .

[43]  Matthew D. Lieberman,et al.  Social cognitive neuroscience: a review of core processes. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[44]  Shaul Shalvi,et al.  References and Notes Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Som Text Figs. S1 to S16 References the Neuropeptide Oxytocin Regulates Parochial Altruism in Intergroup Conflict among Humans , 2022 .

[45]  Mark Rubin,et al.  Intergroup bias. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[46]  E. Fehr,et al.  The Coevolution of Cultural Groups and Ingroup Favoritism , 2008, Science.

[47]  M. Brewer.  In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. , 1979 .

[48]  R. Saxe,et al.  The neural basis of the interaction between theory of mind and moral judgment , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  Jason P. Mitchell.  Activity in right temporo-parietal junction is not selective for theory-of-mind. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.