The genesis, classification, and mapping of soils in urban areas

This paper discusses the concept of soil in both urban and rural environments, and along the urban-rural land use gradient, to illustrate the obvious need to increase our understanding of urban soils. Spatial variability of the urban landscape is illustrated with "Soil series - Urban land complexes" from Baltimore County, Maryland. The World Reference Base for Soil Resources (ISSS-ISRIC-FAO, 1994) proposed Anthrosol and Regosol major soil groups are discussed to show modern approaches to soil classification and to illustrate how the classification of urban soils is essentially undeveloped. Models of soil genesis help identify the processes and functions of the soil system. A conceptual model using Jenny's (1941) state factor approach for human impact on soil formation details the "anthroposequence." The benchmark anthroposequence model may be applied to studying soil systems along urban-rural land use gradients. The process of "anthropedogenesis" is supported to quantify the role of human activity in changing the "natural" direction of soil formation. Future directions of soil research in the urban landscape should involve large scale soil mapping (e.g. 1:6000), benchmark anthroposequences, improved soil classification, and refined characterization of the role of human activities in soil formation.

[1]  S. Pickett,et al.  Soil Characteristics of Oak Stands along an Urban‐Rural Land‐Use Gradient , 1995 .

[2]  R. Weil,et al.  The nature and properties of soils. 11th ed. , 1996 .

[3]  R. Arnold Concepts of soils and pedology , 1983 .

[4]  H. Jenny,et al.  The soil resource. Origin and behavior , 1983, Vegetatio.

[5]  D. H. Yaalon,et al.  FRAMEWORK FOR MAN-MADE SOIL CHANGES-AN OUTLINE OF METAPEDOGENESIS , 1966 .

[6]  F. Nachtergaele Soil taxonomy—a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys: Second edition, by Soil Survey Staff, 1999, USDA–NRCS, Agriculture Handbook number 436, Hardbound , 2001 .

[7]  Neil E. Smeck,et al.  Chapter 3 - Dynamics and Genetic Modelling of Soil Systems , 1983 .

[8]  G. F. Hall,et al.  Pedogenesis and Soil Taxonomy. I. Concepts and interactions. , 1983 .

[9]  L. Wilding,et al.  Chapter 4 - Spatial Variability and Pedology , 1983 .

[10]  J. Foss,et al.  Soils of the Mall in Washington, DC. II. Genesis, classification, and mapping , 1986 .

[11]  ROY W. SlMONSON,et al.  Outline of a Generalized Theory of Soil Genesis , 2002 .

[12]  D. S. Fanning,et al.  Soils of the Mall in Washington, DC: I. Statistical Summary of Properties1 , 1986 .

[13]  Jack Major,et al.  Factors of Soil Formation , 1981 .

[14]  E. Runge,et al.  SOIL DEVELOPMENT SEQUENCES AND ENERGY MODELS , 1973 .

[15]  B. Ulrich,et al.  CHEMICAL CHANGES DUE TO ACID PRECIPITATION IN A LOESS‐DERIVED SOIL IN CENTRAL EUROPE , 1980 .

[16]  D. Fanning,et al.  Soil: Morphology, Genesis, and Classification , 1989 .

[17]  F. Hole,et al.  MAN AS A FACTOR OF SOIL FORMATION , 1965 .

[18]  R. Amundson,et al.  THE PLACE OF HUMANS IN THE STATE FACTOR THEORY OF ECOSYSTEMS AND THEIR SOILS , 1991 .

[19]  R. Huggett,et al.  Soil landscape systems: A model of soil Genesis , 1975 .

[20]  J. U. Smith Urban Soil in Landscape Design , 1995 .

[21]  S. Pickett,et al.  Ecosystem Structure and Function along Urban‐Rural Gradients: An Unexploited Opportunity for Ecology , 1990 .