Comparison of Excavation Damage Zones Resulting from Blasting with Nonel Detonators and Blasting with Electronic Detonators

The nonel detonator is a common type of detonator used in drill-and-blast tunnel excavations, while the use of electronic detonators in recent years has also been gaining popularity in complex tunneling conditions (Fu et al. 2012). The delay time of the latter can be arbitrarily set up accurately according to in situ blasting conditions, from a minimum delay time of 1 ms to a maximum delay time of 15 to 16 s. By detonating blastholes one by one by using electronic detonators, the extent and damage degree of the excavation damaged zone (EDZ) of a tunnel can be better controlled. In order to investigate the beneficial effect of blasting by using electronic detonators, the EDZ associated with the drilland-blast excavation of the Renhechang tunnel located in Chongqing in China by using electronic detonators and nonel detonators are measured and compared in this study. The tunnel has an overburden of 25 to 40 m. The field study involves an ultrasonic wave measurement in drill holes at two different tunnel sections separately excavated by using electronic detonators and nonel detonators. The results demonstrate that using electronic detonators can help limit the EDZ development in drill-and-blast tunnel excavations.

[1]  G. Bäckblom,et al.  Recent experiments in hard rocks to study the excavation response: Implications for the performance of a nuclear waste geological repository , 1999 .

[2]  T. Sato,et al.  In-situ experiments on an excavation disturbed zone induced by mechanical excavation in Neogene sedi , 2000 .

[3]  R. P. Young,et al.  A micro-velocity tool to assess the excavation damaged zone , 1998 .

[4]  M. Ramulu,et al.  Damage assessment of basaltic rock mass due to repeated blasting in a railway tunnelling project – A case study , 2009 .

[5]  C. Wright,et al.  The seismic velocity distribution in the vicinity of a mine tunnel at Thabazimbi, South Africa , 2000 .

[6]  Li Qi RESEARCH ON ACCUMULATIVE DAMAGE EFFECT OF INTERLAID ROCK IN DAMAOSHAN TUNNEL GROUP WITH SMALL CLEAR DISTANCE , 2009 .

[7]  L. Fu Quantitative assessment of the complexity of geological structures in terms of seismic propagators , 2010 .

[8]  P. K. Kaiser,et al.  Quantification of rock mass damage in underground excavations from microseismic event monitoring , 2001 .

[9]  S. Kwon,et al.  An investigation of the excavation damaged zone at the KAERI underground research tunnel , 2009 .

[10]  Ming Cai,et al.  Assessment of excavation damaged zone using a micromechanics model , 2005 .

[11]  David Saiang,et al.  The excavation disturbed zone (EDZ) at Kiirunavaara mine, Sweden—by seismic measurements , 2007 .

[12]  R. Pusch,et al.  The zone of disturbance around blasted tunnels at depth , 1992 .

[13]  N. Hoteit,et al.  Electrical tomography monitoring of the excavation damaged zone of the Gallery 04 in the Mont Terri rock laboratory : Field experiments, modelling, and relationship with structural geology , 2006 .

[14]  Cheng Longxian EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF DECREASING VIBRATION TECHNOLOGY OF TUNNEL BLASTING WITH DIGITAL DETONATOR , 2012 .

[15]  Li Qi NUMERICAL SIMULATION AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF DAMAGE RANGE OF SURROUNDING ROCK IN LARGE TUNNEL UNDER BLASTING EXCAVATION , 2009 .

[16]  D. Gibert,et al.  Seismic tomography of the Excavation Damaged Zone of the Gallery 04 in the Mont Terri Rock Laboratory , 2008 .

[17]  Wang Xuguang THE STATE-OF-THE-ARTS OF INDUSTRIAL DETONATORS , 2003 .

[18]  C. M. St John,et al.  Aseismic design of underground structures , 1987 .