Motion Perception as an Area Process

Motion is perceived whenever a subject is presented with an appropriate spatiotemporal visual pattern. Like many other visual tasks, motion perception involves both local and global processing, and thus might be subject to the well known paradox that arises from the fact that local features and observations form the basis for global perception, but sometimes this global percept can not be easily derived from any single local observation, as is best exemplified by the aperture problem. Globally, dual (transparent) motion can be readily perceived. In this paper, we look for the spatial limits on the local ability to perceive multiple motion. Using the framework of apparent motion, we have found that dual, orthogonally oriented motion can be perceived only when the dots that constitute the two motions are separated by some spatial limit. For short range apparent motion, we have found that the limit is comparable to D max , which is the spatial limit on short range apparent motion and that the visual system can not perceive more than a single coherent motion in a local “patch” of radius D max . We have also found that this spatial limit on local motion perception is not constant, but depends linearly on the spatial organization of the stimuli, and vanishes for stimuli having reverse contrast. We compare the lower bound on the ability to perceive multiple motion to some well known bounds in stereopsis, and propose a cortical architecture that might account for it.

[1]  B. Julesz,et al.  Displacement limits for spatial frequency filtered random-dot cinematograms in apparent motion , 1983, Vision Research.

[2]  R A Andersen,et al.  Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals. I. Psychophysics , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[3]  C. Tyler Stereoscopic Vision: Cortical Limitations and a Disparity Scaling Effect , 1973, Science.

[4]  C. Koch,et al.  The analysis of visual motion: from computational theory to neuronal mechanisms. , 1986, Annual review of neuroscience.

[5]  Petersik Jt The two-process distinction in apparent motion. , 1989 .

[6]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Spatial and temporal parameters of motion detection in the peripheral visual field. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[7]  S. Klein,et al.  Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification , 1985, Vision Research.

[8]  B. Julesz,et al.  A disparity gradient limit for binocular fusion. , 1980, Science.

[9]  O. Braddick,et al.  Masking of low frequency information in short-range apparent motion , 1990, Vision Research.

[10]  A J Ahumada,et al.  Model of human visual-motion sensing. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[11]  R Näsänen,et al.  Cortical magnification and peripheral vision. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[12]  Michael N. Shadlen,et al.  Dichoptic activation of the early motion system , 1993, Vision Research.

[13]  Jyrki Rovamo,et al.  Illusory perception of gratings stimulating a small number of neurones , 1994, Vision Research.

[14]  D Marr,et al.  Directional selectivity and its use in early visual processing , 1981, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[15]  O. Braddick A short-range process in apparent motion. , 1974, Vision research.

[16]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Biological image motion processing: A review , 1985, Vision Research.

[17]  A. Watson,et al.  The optimal motion stimulus , 1995, Vision Research.

[18]  P Cavanagh,et al.  Short-range vs long-range motion: not a valid distinction. , 1991, Spatial vision.

[19]  E H Adelson,et al.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[20]  Curtis L. Baker,et al.  Eccentricity-dependent scaling of the limits for short-range apparent motion perception , 1985, Vision Research.

[21]  C. Tyler Spatial organization of binocular disparity sensitivity , 1975, Vision Research.

[22]  Petersik Jt,et al.  Comments on Cavanagh and Mather (1989): Coming up short (and long) , 1991 .

[23]  S. Anstis The perception of apparent movement. , 1980, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[24]  Yehezkel Yeshurun,et al.  Cepstral Filtering on a Columnar Image Architecture: A Fast Algorithm for Binocular Stereo Segmentation , 2011, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[25]  J. van Santen,et al.  Elaborated Reichardt detectors. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[26]  C. WILLIAM TYLER,et al.  Depth perception in disparity gratings , 1974, Nature.

[27]  P. Burt,et al.  Time, distance, and feature trade-offs in visual apparent motion. , 1981 .

[28]  Jan J. Koenderink,et al.  Metrics for the strength of low-level motion perception , 1990, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[29]  P. H. Schiller Central connections of the retinal ON and OFF pathways , 1982, Nature.

[30]  O J Braddick,et al.  Low-level and high-level processes in apparent motion. , 1980, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[31]  Eric L. Schwartz,et al.  Computational anatomy and functional architecture of striate cortex: A spatial mapping approach to perceptual coding , 1980, Vision Research.

[32]  M. J. Morgan,et al.  Spatial filtering precedes motion detection , 1992, Nature.

[33]  B. Julesz,et al.  Cooperative phenomena in apparent movement perception of random-dot cinematograms , 1984, Vision Research.

[34]  K. N. Ogle Researches in binocular vision. , 1950 .

[35]  L. Glass,et al.  Pattern Recognition in Humans: Correlations Which Cannot be Perceived , 1976, Perception.

[36]  Chuan Yi Tang,et al.  A 2.|E|-Bit Distributed Algorithm for the Directed Euler Trail Problem , 1993, Inf. Process. Lett..