A new approach and case study for estimating extent and rates of habitat loss for ecological communities

Abstract The pace and magnitude of biodiversity loss has led to wide recognition that efforts to conserve individual species must be complemented by assessment and planning at community and ecosystem levels. Emerging protocols for assessing the conservation status of communities include as central criteria the current extent, historical reduction and contemporary rate of decline in geographic distribution. Estimation of these parameters is confronted by methodological challenges, data limitations and uncertainties that may vary from case to case. We describe an approach to these issues comprising five steps: (1) classification of the community using an analysis of data from systematic ground surveys; (2) mapping to produce a contemporary baseline distribution (1980s); (3) interpolation to produce a historical distribution (pre-European settlement); (4) interpretation of satellite imagery to update the distribution (various dates up to 2004) and (5) assessment of change in extent over historical and contemporary time scales incorporating plausible bounds of uncertainty around best estimates. The bounds can be based on areas for which image interpretation produces uncertain diagnosis of clearing and differences between credible alternative base maps of the same area. We demonstrated the approach using a case study of Coolibah–Black Box Woodland, a declining semi-arid woodland community in Australia and found that 61% (plausible range 50–67%) of the woodland community had been cleared since European settlement and that during 1998–2004 the community continued to decline on average by 135.3(±21.7) km 2 each year, or 1.7(±0.3)% of each previous year’s distribution, apparently accelerating in recent years. Strengths of the approach include the use of biological data (cf. remote sensing) to distinguish the target assemblage from others, the use of historical and contemporary base lines to examine change over different time scales, and the use of bounded estimates to incorporate uncertainty into the assessment.

[1]  J. Balch,et al.  Assessing extinction risk in the absence of species-level data: quantitative criteria for terrestrial ecosystems , 2006, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[2]  D. Bal,et al.  AS WE SEE IT Harmonization of Red Lists in Europe: some lessons learned in the Netherlands when applying the new IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria version 3.1. , 2007 .

[3]  S. Fritz,et al.  A land cover map of South America , 2004 .

[4]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Spatial modelling of biodiversity at the community level , 2006 .

[5]  David Keith,et al.  Ocean shores to desert dunes : the native vegetation of New South Wales and the ACT , 2004 .

[6]  Sarah L. Benfield,et al.  A comparison of coral reef and coral community fish assemblages in Pacific Panama and environmental factors governing their structure , 2008, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[7]  D. Fuller,et al.  Loss of Forest Cover in Kalimantan, Indonesia, Since the 1997–1998 El Niño , 2004 .

[8]  Brendan Mackey,et al.  Assessing the representativeness of the wet tropics of Queensland world heritage property , 1989 .

[9]  Jonathan S. Adams,et al.  Precious heritage : the status of biodiversity in the United States , 2000 .

[10]  J. Heino,et al.  Spatial scale affects community concordance among fishes, benthic macroinvertebrates, and bryophytes in streams. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[11]  J. Rodríguez,et al.  Tropical Dry Forests of Venezuela: Characterization and Current Conservation Status 1 , 2005 .

[12]  D. Moss,et al.  The Diversity of European Vegetation: an overview of phytosociological alliances and their relationships to EUNIS habitats , 2002 .

[13]  S. N. Trigg,et al.  Lowland Forest Loss in Protected Areas of Indonesian Borneo , 2004, Science.

[14]  M. Keller,et al.  Selective Logging in the Brazilian Amazon , 2005, Science.

[15]  E. Wilson.  The Diversity of Life , 1992 .

[16]  R. Congalton,et al.  Accuracy assessment: a user's perspective , 1986 .

[17]  M. Burgman.  Risks and Decisions for Conservation and Environmental Management: Experts, stakeholders and elicitation , 2005 .

[18]  M. Pearl,et al.  Conservation for the twenty-first century , 1990 .

[19]  R. Kingsford,et al.  Use of satellite image analysis to track wetland loss on the Murrumbidgee River floodplain in arid Australia, 1975-1998. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[20]  D. Tindall,et al.  Natural Vegetation of the New South Wales Wheat-belt (Cobar-Nyngan- Gilgandra, Nymagee-Narromine-Dubbo 1:250 000 vegetation sheets) , 2003 .

[21]  J. Hunter.  Vegetation of Culgoa National Park, central northern New South Wales , 2005 .

[22]  R. Noss,et al.  Ecosystems as conservation targets. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[23]  D. Keith.  The interpretation, assessment and conservation of ecological communities. , 2009 .

[24]  C. Justice,et al.  MAPPING TROPICAL DEFORESTATION IN CENTRAL AFRICA , 2005, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[25]  D. Wilcove,et al.  Assessing the Threat Status of Ecological Communities , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[26]  Christopher C. Simpson,et al.  Patterns and Determinants of Historical Woodland Clearing in Central-Western New South Wales, Australia , 2007 .

[27]  L. Curran,et al.  Sustainability science from space: Quantifying forest disturbance and land-use dynamics in the Amazon , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  G. Mace,et al.  Making Consistent IUCN Classifications under Uncertainty , 2000 .