ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND INNOVATION - ORGANIZATIONS, INSTITUTIONS, SYSTEMS AND REGIONS

This paper is drawing on extensive theoretical research and literature reviews, and presents a framework based on theories on networking, knowledge creation and innovation. It then introduces three European cases to illustrate practical applications of the framework, and also links the findings to three Chinese cases to make comparative observations as well as recommendations related to Triple Helix concepts and their implications in the China context. It addresses the issue how learning from universities can enhance company flexibility and performance in innovation, and outlines three different models of collaboration. This paper provides a new theoretical rationale for I-U learning alliances as a natural way out from the managerial problem of trying to perform both exploration and exploitation within the same company boundaries. Through our theoretical framework, the academic science domain becomes a logical partner to handle the full phase of exploration and support the process of exploitation. The presented European cases of Bang & Olufsen, Combibloc and Porsche offer new insights into how to perform this act in practice, while the three China related cases allow us to cross analyse empirical findings and draw initial conclusions with policy implications for China.

[1]  Georg Krücken Mission impossible? Institutional barriers to the diffusion of the "third academic mission" at German universities , 2003, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[2]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Enter the Dragon: China's Computer Industry , 2002, Computer.

[3]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  Emergence of a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations , 1996 .

[4]  J. H. Dyer,et al.  Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case , 2000 .

[5]  Sigvald Harryson,et al.  How Canon and Sony Drive Product Innovation Through Networking and Application-Focused R&D , 1997 .

[6]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  The Management of Innovation. , 1963 .

[7]  W. Dobson,et al.  Multinationals and East Asian integration , 1997 .

[8]  Maximilian von Zedtwitz,et al.  Managing Foreign R&D Laboratories in China , 2004 .

[9]  P. Lorange,et al.  Bringing the College Inside , 2005 .

[10]  T. Gonard,et al.  The process of change in relationships between public research and industry: two case studies from France , 1999 .

[11]  Joseph R. D’cruz,et al.  Multinationals As Flagship Firms: Regional Business Networks , 2000 .

[12]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Qualitative research and case study applications in education , 1998 .

[13]  Sigvald Harryson Japanese Technology and Innovation Management: From Know-How to Know-Who , 1998 .

[14]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[15]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations , 2003, Scientometrics.

[16]  R. Burt The Social Structure of Competition , 2004 .

[17]  I. Heyman Tolkning och reflektion , 1996 .

[18]  K. Yamamura,et al.  Asia in Japan's embrace : building a regional production alliance , 1996 .

[19]  Timothy M. Devinney,et al.  Multinationals As Flagship Firms , 2001 .

[20]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Industry/University Licensing: Characteristics, Concerns and Issues from the Perspective of the Buyer , 2003 .

[21]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[22]  H. Etzkowitz Research groups as ???quasi-firms???: the invention of the entrepreneurial university , 2003 .

[23]  D. Hugh Whittaker,et al.  The Japanese Enterprise System: Competitive Strategies and Cooperative Structures. , 1992 .

[24]  Mark P. Rice,et al.  Opportunity Recognition and Breakthrough Innovation in Large Established Firms , 2001 .

[25]  E. Mansfield,et al.  The modern university: contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support , 1996 .

[26]  Doris Schartinger,et al.  Interactive Relations Between Universities and Firms: Empirical Evidence for Austria , 2001 .

[27]  U. Schmoch,et al.  Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields , 1998 .

[28]  Sigvald Harryson The Japanese Know-Who Based Model of Innovation Management — Reducing Risk at High Speed , 2006 .

[29]  Andrea Piccaluga,et al.  Exploitation and diffusion of public research: the case of academic spin-off companies in Italy , 2000 .

[30]  D. North Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance: Economic performance , 1990 .

[31]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[32]  G. O'Connor,et al.  Assessing Transition Readiness for Radical Innovation , 2002 .

[33]  Maria Nedeva,et al.  The international dimension to industry-academic links , 2003, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[34]  Y. Helble,et al.  The Importance of Internal and External R&D Network Linkages for R&D Organisations: Evidence from Singapore , 2004 .

[35]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[36]  E. C. Martins,et al.  Building organisational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation , 2003 .

[37]  D. Leonard-Barton CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[38]  Min Chen Asian Management Systems: Chinese, Japanese and Korean Styles of Business , 1995 .

[39]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[40]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[41]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[42]  Ronald Dore,et al.  The Japanese firm : the sources of competitive strength , 1997 .

[43]  Henry Wai-chung Yeung,et al.  Organising regional production networks in Southeast Asia: implications for production fragmentation, trade, and rules of origin , 2001 .

[44]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[45]  Fiona E. Murray Following Distinctive Paths of Knowledge: Strategies for Organizational Knowledge Building within Science-Based Firms , 2001 .

[46]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Enabling Knowledge Creation: How to Unlock the Mystery of Tacit Knowledge and Release the Power of Innovation , 2000 .

[47]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[48]  C. Bartlett,et al.  The Multinational Corporation as an Interorganizational Network , 1990 .

[49]  Richard Florida,et al.  When Social Capital Stifles Innovation , 2002 .

[50]  G. Stalk,et al.  Competing on capabilities: the new rules of corporate strategy. , 1992, Harvard business review.

[51]  M. Sawhney Don't homogenize, synchronize. , 2001, Harvard business review.

[52]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[53]  Richard Whitley,et al.  Business Systems in East Asia: Firms, Markets and Societies , 1992 .

[54]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Time pacing: competing in markets that won't stand still. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[55]  Akbar Zaheer,et al.  Network Memory: The Influence of Past and Current Networks on Performance , 2004 .

[56]  Usha C. V. Haley Strategic management in the Asia Pacific : harnessing regional and organizational change for competitive advantage , 2000 .

[57]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect , 1996 .

[58]  George Jr. Stalk Hout Competing Against Time : How Time Based Competition Is Reshaping Global Markets , 2002 .

[59]  Sigvald Harryson,et al.  Making innovative use of academic knowledge to enhance corporate technology innovation impact , 2007, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[60]  Sigvald Harryson,et al.  Flexibility in innovation through external learning: exploring two models for enhanced industry-university collaboration , 2008, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[61]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[62]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Product development performance : strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry / Kim B. Clark, Tahahiro Fujimoto , 1991 .

[63]  Philippe Lasserre,et al.  Strategies for Asia Pacific : beyond the crisis , 1999 .

[64]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Concept of “Ba”: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation , 1998 .

[65]  P. A. Yotopoulos Regional integration and the Asia-Pacific , 1998, The Journal of Asian Studies.