Spread in model climate sensitivity traced to atmospheric convective mixing

Equilibrium climate sensitivity refers to the ultimate change in global mean temperature in response to a change in external forcing. Despite decades of research attempting to narrow uncertainties, equilibrium climate sensitivity estimates from climate models still span roughly 1.5 to 5 degrees Celsius for a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration, precluding accurate projections of future climate. The spread arises largely from differences in the feedback from low clouds, for reasons not yet understood. Here we show that differences in the simulated strength of convective mixing between the lower and middle tropical troposphere explain about half of the variance in climate sensitivity estimated by 43 climate models. The apparent mechanism is that such mixing dehydrates the low-cloud layer at a rate that increases as the climate warms, and this rate of increase depends on the initial mixing strength, linking the mixing to cloud feedback. The mixing inferred from observations appears to be sufficiently strong to imply a climate sensitivity of more than 3 degrees for a doubling of carbon dioxide. This is significantly higher than the currently accepted lower bound of 1.5 degrees, thereby constraining model projections towards relatively severe future warming.

[1]  D. Hartmann,et al.  On the Use of Earth Radiation Budget Statistics for Studies of Clouds and Climate , 1980 .

[2]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  Intercomparison and interpretation of climate feedback processes in 19 atmospheric general circulation models , 1990 .

[3]  K. Emanuel,et al.  An Improved Model of the Equatorial Troposphere and Its Coupling with the Stratosphere , 1991 .

[4]  M. Allen,et al.  Constraints on future changes in climate and the hydrologic cycle , 2002, Nature.

[5]  Jonathan M. Gregory,et al.  A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity , 2004 .

[6]  A. Sterl,et al.  The ERA‐40 re‐analysis , 2005 .

[7]  S. Bony,et al.  Marine boundary layer clouds at the heart of tropical cloud feedback uncertainties in climate models , 2005 .

[8]  S. Sherwood,et al.  The General Circulation and Robust Relative Humidity , 2006 .

[9]  B. Soden,et al.  An Assessment of Climate Feedbacks in Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Models , 2006 .

[10]  B. Soden,et al.  Robust Responses of the Hydrological Cycle to Global Warming , 2006 .

[11]  Siegfried Schubert,et al.  NASA's Modern Era Retrospective-Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA): Early Results and Future Directions , 2006 .

[12]  B. Stevens.  On the Growth of Layers of Nonprecipitating Cumulus Convection , 2007 .

[13]  Masson-Delmotte,et al.  The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[14]  Brian J. Soden,et al.  Quantifying Climate Feedbacks Using Radiative Kernels , 2008 .

[15]  C. Thorncroft,et al.  Shallow Meridional Circulations in the Tropical Atmosphere , 2008 .

[16]  S. Sherwood,et al.  Robust Tropospheric Warming Revealed by Iteratively Homogenized Radiosonde Data , 2008 .

[17]  Sandrine Bony,et al.  An Assessment of the Primary Sources of Spread of Global Warming Estimates from Coupled Atmosphere–Ocean Models , 2008 .

[18]  E. M. Volodin.  Relation between temperature sensitivity to doubled carbon dioxide and the distribution of clouds in current climate models , 2008 .

[19]  R. Nolte,et al.  Observational and Model Evidence for Positive Low-Level Cloud Feedback , 2009 .

[20]  Frédéric Hourdin,et al.  Shifting the diurnal cycle of parameterized deep convection over land , 2009 .

[21]  D. Nolan,et al.  Idealized Simulations of the Intertropical Convergence Zone and Its Multilevel Flows , 2010 .

[22]  Tammy M. Weckwerth,et al.  Tropospheric water vapor, convection, and climate , 2010 .

[23]  Stephen A. Klein,et al.  Computing and Partitioning Cloud Feedbacks Using Cloud Property Histograms. Part I: Cloud Radiative Kernels , 2012 .

[24]  G. Vecchi,et al.  The vertical distribution of cloud feedback in coupled ocean‐atmosphere models , 2011 .

[25]  S. Schubert,et al.  MERRA: NASA’s Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications , 2011 .

[26]  Karl E. Taylor,et al.  An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design , 2012 .

[27]  M. Webb,et al.  Coupling between subtropical cloud feedback and the local hydrological cycle in a climate model , 2013, Climate Dynamics.

[28]  S. Bony,et al.  Interpretation of the positive low-cloud feedback predicted by a climate model under global warming , 2013, Climate Dynamics.

[29]  K. Trenberth,et al.  A Less Cloudy Future: The Role of Subtropical Subsidence in Climate Sensitivity , 2012, Science.

[30]  M. Webb,et al.  Origins of differences in climate sensitivity, forcing and feedback in climate models , 2013, Climate Dynamics.

[31]  B. Stevens,et al.  Marine Boundary Layer Cloud Feedbacks in a Constant Relative Humidity Atmosphere , 2012 .

[32]  S. Klein,et al.  Are climate model simulations of clouds improving? An evaluation using the ISCCP simulator , 2012 .

[33]  S. Bony,et al.  On the interpretation of inter-model spread in CMIP5 climate sensitivity estimates , 2013, Climate Dynamics.

[34]  T. Andrews,et al.  Evaluating adjusted forcing and model spread for historical and future scenarios in the CMIP5 generation of climate models , 2013 .

[35]  R. Allan,et al.  Climate Warming–Related Strengthening of the Tropical Hydrological Cycle , 2013 .