Scientific or regulated validation: a tiered approach? Meeting report from a joint EBF/DVDMDG workshop.

Tiered approach is rapidly gaining interest in the regulated bioanalytical community. Alternative approaches to the workflows as proposed in the regulatory Guidance (US FDA, EMA) are being used in discovery and early drug development, but with a growing array of assay types and studies requiring bioanalytical support in early drug development, the bioanalytical community is discussing how to bring best value to support these studies. Recently, international industry groups like European Bioanalysis Forum and Global Bioanalysis Consortium have discussed and published on the opportunity and need to include tiered approach more systematically in the early drug development support. On the back of these discussions, the Delaware Valley Drug Metabolism Discussion Group together with the European Bioanalysis Forum organized a meeting in Langhorne (PA, USA) to discuss the hurdles and added value of tiered approach with stakeholders from the Bioanalysis, quality assurance and PK community. The discussions focused on proposing scientific validation for studies where there is currently a mixed use of regulatory and tiered approach workflows. The meeting was well attended and the presentations and panel discussions contributed to a better understanding of what the industry is proposing as future practice.

[1]  Magnus Knutsson,et al.  Feedback from the European Bioanalysis Forum Workshop: taking tiered approach to the next level. , 2014, Bioanalysis.

[2]  Nathalie Mokrzycki,et al.  Recommendations from the European Bioanalysis Forum on method establishment for tissue homogenates. , 2014, Bioanalysis.

[3]  Richard W Abbott,et al.  Tiered approach: sense and sensibility. , 2014, Bioanalysis.

[4]  D. Muirhead,et al.  Measuring soluble biomarkers in clinical trials: do tiered approaches to the analysis and validation of assays provide an answer to the fit-for-purpose challenge? , 2014, Bioanalysis.

[5]  Philip Timmerman,et al.  Tiered approach revisited: introducing stage-appropriate or assay-appropriate scientific validation. , 2014, Bioanalysis.

[6]  Thomas Pfeifer,et al.  Bioanalysis for plasma protein binding studies in drug discovery and drug development: views and recommendations of the European Bioanalysis Forum. , 2014, Bioanalysis.

[7]  Shuguang Ma,et al.  A tiered approach to address regulatory drug metabolite-related issues in drug development. , 2014, Bioanalysis.

[8]  Jian Wang,et al.  Reflecting on a decade of metabolite screening and monitoring. , 2014, Bioanalysis.

[9]  P. Timmerman,et al.  Managing scientific, technical and regulatory innovation in regulated bioanalysis: a discussion paper from the European Bioanalysis Forum. , 2013, Bioanalysis.

[10]  C. T. Viswanathan Bringing new technologies into regulatory space. , 2012, Bioanalysis.

[11]  Magnus Knutsson,et al.  European Bioanalysis Forum recommendation: scientific validation of quantification by accelerator mass spectrometry. , 2012, Bioanalysis.

[12]  Brian Booth,et al.  When do you need a validated assay? , 2011, Bioanalysis.

[13]  P. Timmerman,et al.  Best practices in a tiered approach to metabolite quantification: views and recommendations of the European Bioanalysis Forum. , 2010, Bioanalysis.

[14]  Roy Macarthur,et al.  Generic approach to validation of small-molecule LC-MS/MS biomarker assays. , 2009, Bioanalysis.

[15]  C. T. Viswanathan,et al.  Workshop/conference report—Quantitative bioanalytical methods validation and implementation: Best practices for chromatographic and ligand binding assays , 2007, The AAPS Journal.

[16]  Viswanath Devanarayan,et al.  Fit-for-Purpose Method Development and Validation for Successful Biomarker Measurement , 2006, Pharmaceutical Research.

[17]  Thomas Layloff,et al.  Analytical Methods Validation: Bioavailability, Bioequivalence and Pharmacokinetic Studies , 1992, Pharmaceutical Research.

[18]  P. Singhal,et al.  Tiered Approaches to Chromatographic Bioanalytical Method Performance Evaluation: Recommendation for Best Practices and Harmonization from the Global Bioanalysis Consortium Harmonization Team , 2014, The AAPS Journal.