Investigation of discharge reaction mechanism of lithium|liquid electrolyte|sulfur battery

Abstract The influence of current density on the discharge reaction of Li–S batteries is investigated by discharge tests (first discharge curve), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), X-ray diffraction (XRD) (discharge products), and scanning electron microscopy (the surface morphology of sulfur electrodes). The first discharge capacity and the plateau potential both decrease with increasing current density. When the current density is increased from 100 to 1600 mA g−1 S, the discharge capacity decreases from 1178 to 217 mAh g−1 S. When the Li–S battery is discharged at low current density, i.e., below 400 mA g−1 S, elemental sulfur is fully converted to Li2S, which is observable from XRD and DSC data. Only one plateau is observed in the discharge curve for current densities above 400 mA g−1 S. Part of the elemental sulfur still remains after discharging at high current densities (over 800 mA g−1 S). Thus the discharge capacity at high current density is smaller than that at low current density due to un-reacted elemental sulfur after discharge.

[1]  Hee‐Tak Kim,et al.  Rechargeable Lithium Sulfur Battery II. Rate Capability and Cycle Characteristics , 2003 .

[2]  Kwang Man Kim,et al.  Preparation and electrochemical properties of lithium–sulfur polymer batteries , 2002 .

[3]  Hee‐Tak Kim,et al.  Rechargeable Lithium Sulfur Battery I. Structural Change of Sulfur Cathode During Discharge and Charge , 2003 .

[4]  Minoru Matsuda,et al.  Study on the reduction species of sulfur by alkali metals in nonaqueous solvents , 1997 .

[5]  Jou-Hyeon Ahn,et al.  Discharge process of Li/PVdF/S cells at room temperature , 2006 .

[6]  J. Shim,et al.  The Lithium/Sulfur Rechargeable Cell Effects of Electrode Composition and Solvent on Cell Performance , 2002 .

[7]  Emanuel Peled,et al.  Rechargeable lithiumsulfur battery (extended abstract) , 1989 .

[8]  Jiulin Wang,et al.  Electrochemical characteristics of sulfur composite cathode materials in rechargeable lithium batteries , 2004 .

[9]  K. Striebel,et al.  Electrochemical performance of lithium/sulfur cells with three different polymer electrolytes , 2000 .

[10]  Sang-Cheol Han,et al.  Effect of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes on Electrochemical Properties of Lithium/Sulfur Rechargeable Batteries , 2003 .

[11]  Yuriy V. Mikhaylik,et al.  Low Temperature Performance of Li/S Batteries , 2003 .

[12]  Yong-Mook Kang,et al.  Effects of Nanosized Adsorbing Material on Electrochemical Properties of Sulfur Cathodes for Li/S Secondary Batteries , 2004 .

[13]  A. J. Lee,et al.  Factors affecting the mechanical and viscoelastic properties of acrylic bone cement , 2002, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[14]  Jung-Ki Park,et al.  Electrochemical performance of lithium/sulfur batteries with protected Li anodes , 2003 .

[15]  Soojin Park,et al.  Effects of imidazolium salts on discharge performance of rechargeable lithium–sulfur cells containing organic solvent electrolytes , 2005 .

[16]  Zhijun Ling,et al.  Polymer lithium cells with sulfur composites as cathode materials , 2003 .

[17]  Hee‐Tak Kim,et al.  Binary electrolyte based on tetra(ethylene glycol) dimethyl ether and 1,3-dioxolane for lithium-sulfur battery , 2002 .

[18]  Elton J. Cairns,et al.  Self-discharge of lithium–sulfur cells using stainless-steel current-collectors , 2005 .