Illusory Volumes from Conformation

The purpose of this paper is to offer demonstrations of ‘illusory volumes’ in the spirit of the illusory flat surfaces described by Kanizsa. These demonstrations of illusory volumes exploit a new cue to the recovery of surface curvature from ambiguous images: conformation. In assuming conformation, the visual system assumes that the surface of a volume conforms to the curvature of its neighboring, underlying, or supporting surface, in the absence of image cues to the contrary. Demonstrations that exploit the assumption of conformation provide several insights into the nature of the inferential processing that underlies contour, surface, and volume formation. In particular, these demonstrations imply that the visual system does not calculate local surface curvature, illusory contours, or occlusion relationships before it analyzes global surface relationships.

[1]  Kent A. Stevens,et al.  The Visual Interpretation of Surface Contours , 1981, Artif. Intell..

[2]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Parts of recognition , 1984, Cognition.

[3]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Solving the "real" mysteries of visual perception: the world as an outside memory. , 1992, Canadian journal of psychology.

[4]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Amodal Representation of Occluded Surfaces: Role of Invisible Stimuli in Apparent Motion Correspondence , 1990, Perception.

[5]  G. Kanizsa Subjective contours. , 1976, Scientific American.

[6]  Pu Tse A planar cut approach to volume recovery from silhouettes , 1999 .

[7]  Stephen E. Palmer,et al.  Perception of partly occluded objects: A microgenetic analysis. , 1992 .

[8]  J T Todd,et al.  Visual perception of smoothly curved surfaces from double-projected contour patterns. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  S. Petry,et al.  Adelphi International Conference on Illusory Contours: A report on the Conference , 1986 .

[10]  D Marr,et al.  Cooperative computation of stereo disparity. , 1976, Science.

[11]  Stephen Wallace,et al.  Figure and Ground , 1982 .

[12]  David J. Field,et al.  Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field” , 1993, Vision Research.

[13]  F. Purghé Illusory Figures from Stereoscopically Three-Dimensional Inducers Depicting No Occlusion Event , 1995, Perception.

[14]  G. Kanizsa,et al.  Organization in Vision: Essays on Gestalt Perception , 1979 .

[15]  Peter Ulric Tse,et al.  Volume Completion , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Visual surface representation: a critical link between lower-level and higher level vision , 1995 .

[17]  J T Todd,et al.  Surface range and attitude probing in stereoscopically presented dynamic scenes. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  George J. Carman,et al.  Three-dimensional illusory contours and surfaces , 1992, Nature.

[19]  Masanori Idesawa Two types of occlusion cues for the perception of 3-D illusory objects in binocular fusion , 1993 .

[20]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of form perception: boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon color spreading. , 1985, Psychological review.

[21]  P. Kellman,et al.  A theory of visual interpolation in object perception , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  J J Koenderink,et al.  On So-Called Paradoxical Monocular Stereoscopy , 1994, Perception.

[23]  J T Todd,et al.  The Visual Discrimination of Relative Surface Orientation , 1995, Perception.

[24]  W Gerbino,et al.  The effect of a modal completion on visual matching. , 1987, Acta psychologica.

[25]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Surface perception in pictures , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Perceived surface shape not features determines correspondence strength in apparent motion , 1994, Vision Research.

[27]  M. Brady,et al.  The Perception of Subjective Surfaces , 1981 .

[28]  D C Knill,et al.  Perception of surface contours and surface shape: from computation to psychophysics. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[29]  S Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of perceptual grouping: Textures, boundaries, and emergent segmentations , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  K Nakayama,et al.  Stereoscopic Depth: Its Relation to Image Segmentation, Grouping, and the Recognition of Occluded Objects , 1989, Perception.

[31]  Bruce M. Bennett,et al.  Description of solid shape and its inference from occluding contours , 1987 .

[32]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Surfaces versus features in visual search , 1992, Nature.

[33]  P U Tse,et al.  Amodal Completion in the Absence of Image Tangent Discontinuities , 1998, Perception.

[34]  J T Todd,et al.  Visual discrimination of local surface depth and orientation , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  David G. Lowe,et al.  Three-Dimensional Object Recognition from Single Two-Dimensional Images , 1987, Artif. Intell..

[36]  A. Michotte,et al.  Les compléments amodaux des structures perceptives , 1964 .

[37]  J J Koenderink,et al.  What Does the Occluding Contour Tell Us about Solid Shape? , 1984, Perception.

[38]  G. Kanizsa Margini Quasi-percettivi in Campi con Stimolazione Omogenea , 1955 .