Tumor cell response to synchrotron microbeam radiation therapy differs markedly from cells in normal tissues.

PURPOSE High-dose synchrotron microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) can be effective at destroying tumors in animal models while causing very little damage to normal tissues. The aim of this study was to investigate the cellular processes behind this observation of potential clinical importance. METHODS AND MATERIALS MRT was performed using a lattice of 25 mum-wide, planar, polychromatic, kilovoltage X-ray microbeams, with 200-microm peak separation. Inoculated EMT-6.5 tumor and normal mouse skin tissues were harvested at defined intervals post-MRT. Immunohistochemical detection of gamma-H2AX allowed precise localization of irradiated cells, which were also assessed for proliferation and apoptosis. RESULTS MRT significantly reduced tumor cell proliferation by 24 h post-irradiation (p = 0.002). An unexpected finding was that within 24 h of MRT, peak and valley irradiated zones were indistinguishable in tumors because of extensive cell migration between the zones. This was not seen in MRT-treated normal skin, which appeared to undergo a coordinated repair response. MRT elicited an increase in median survival times of EMT-6.5 and 67NR tumor-inoculated mice similar to that achieved with conventional radiotherapy, while causing markedly less normal tissue damage. CONCLUSIONS This study provides evidence of a differential response at a cellular level between normal and tumor tissues after synchrotron MRT.

[1]  L. Feinendegen,et al.  Tissue-sparing effect of x-ray microplanar beams particularly in the CNS: is a bystander effect involved? , 2007, Experimental hematology.

[2]  A Bravin,et al.  Radiosurgical palliation of aggressive murine SCCVII squamous cell carcinomas using synchrotron-generated X-ray microbeams. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  H. Kitamura,et al.  SPECTRA: a synchrotron radiation calculation code. , 2001, Journal of synchrotron radiation.

[4]  F. Avraham Dilmanian,et al.  Murine EMT-6 Carcinoma: High Therapeutic Efficacy of Microbeam Radiation Therapy , 2003, Radiation research.

[5]  D N Slatkin,et al.  Subacute neuropathological effects of microplanar beams of x-rays from a synchrotron wiggler. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Kai Rothkamm,et al.  Evidence for a lack of DNA double-strand break repair in human cells exposed to very low x-ray doses , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Jennifer A. Smith,et al.  Response of rat intracranial 9L gliosarcoma to microbeam radiation therapy. , 2002, Neuro-oncology.

[8]  E. Rosen,et al.  Response of Rat Skin to High-Dose Unidirectional X-Ray Microbeams: A Histological Study , 2003, Radiation research.

[9]  Terry M. Button,et al.  RESPONSE OF RAT INTRACRANIAL 9L GLIOSARCOMA TO MICROBEAM RADIATION THERAPY , 2002 .

[10]  Vicky Goh,et al.  Leukocyte DNA damage after multi-detector row CT: a quantitative biomarker of low-level radiation exposure. , 2007, Radiology.

[11]  H. Blattmann,et al.  Prospects for microbeam radiation therapy of brain tumours in children to reduce neurological sequelae , 2007, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[12]  Marianne Geiser,et al.  Neuropathology of ablation of rat gliosarcomas and contiguous brain tissues using a microplanar beam of synchrotron‐wiggler‐generated X rays , 1998, International journal of cancer.

[13]  Alberto Bravin,et al.  Weanling piglet cerebellum: a surrogate for tolerance to MRT (microbeam radiation therapy) in pediatric neuro-oncology , 2001, Optics + Photonics.

[14]  K. Shinohara,et al.  Induction of DNA double-strand breaks and cellular migration through bystander effects in cells irradiated with the slit-type microplanar beam of the spring-8 synchrotron. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  Alberto Bravin,et al.  In vivo two-photon microscopy study of short-term effects of microbeam irradiation on normal mouse brain microvasculature. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  E. Sahai,et al.  Imaging amoeboid cancer cell motility in vivo , 2008, Journal of microscopy.

[17]  K. Uesugi,et al.  Dose distribution of a 125 keV mean energy microplanar x-ray beam for basic studies on microbeam radiotherapy. , 2008, Medical physics.

[18]  S. Bentzen Preventing or reducing late side effects of radiation therapy: radiobiology meets molecular pathology , 2006, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[19]  Emmanuel L Barbier,et al.  Brain tumor vessel response to synchrotron microbeam radiation therapy: a short-term in vivo study , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.