An Analysis of Representation Shift in Concept Learning

In spite of the importance of representation in learning, little progress has been made toward understanding what makes representations work. This paper describes a framework for knowledge-level analysis of changes in the representation of training examples in concept learning. This a very fundamental sort of representation change; such a change alters the very space over which learning occurs, find hence necessitates selection of a new hypothesis space and (probably) a new learning algorithm. The goals of this paper are first, to provide a framework for analysis of representation shifts; second, to make explicit the assumptions implicit in representation shifts that have actually been used in learning systems; and third, to suggest a procedure for finding the most appropriate representation shift, given some background knowledge about a learning problem. The analytic framework is used to analyze a class of hybrid EBL/SBL systems by characterizing the sorts of domain theories that can be used with these systems.

[1]  N. Littlestone Learning Quickly When Irrelevant Attributes Abound: A New Linear-Threshold Algorithm , 1987, 28th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1987).

[2]  Patricia Riddle Reformulation from state space of reduction space , 1989, ICML 1989.

[3]  Smadar T. Kedar-Cabelli,et al.  Explanation-Based Generalization as Resolution Theorem Proving , 1987 .

[4]  Richard E. Korf,et al.  Toward a Model of Representation Changes , 1980, Artif. Intell..

[5]  H. Hirsh Incremental Version-Space Merging: A General Framework for Concept Learning , 1990 .

[6]  Lonnie Chrisman Evaluating Bias During Pac-Learning , 1989, ML.

[7]  Robert C. Holte,et al.  A Mathematical Framework for Studying Representation , 1989, ML.

[8]  Leslie G. Valiant,et al.  A theory of the learnable , 1984, STOC '84.

[9]  Devika Subramanian Representational Issues in Machine Learning , 1989, ML.

[10]  William W. Cohen Learning from Textbook Knowledge: A Case Study , 1990, AAAI.

[11]  E. Mark Gold,et al.  Language Identification in the Limit , 1967, Inf. Control..

[12]  Benjamin N. Grosof,et al.  Declarative Bias for Structural Domains , 1989, ML.

[13]  George Drastal,et al.  Induction in an Abstraction Space: A Form of Constructive Induction , 1989, IJCAI.

[14]  Allen Newell,et al.  The Knowledge Level , 1989, Artif. Intell..

[15]  M. Lowry STRATA: Problem Reformulation and Abstract Data Types , 1990 .

[16]  Richard M. Keller Compiling Learning Vocabulary from a Performance System Description , 1989, ML.

[17]  Paul E. Utgoff,et al.  Shift of bias for inductive concept learning , 1984 .

[18]  William W. Cohen Generalizing Number and Learning from Multiple Examples in Explanation Based Learning , 1988, ML.