Semi-automated segmentation of solid and GGO nodules in lung CT images using vessel-likelihood derived from local foreground structure

Reflecting global interest in lung cancer screening, considerable attention has been paid to automatic segmentation and volumetric measurement of lung nodules on CT. Ground glass opacity (GGO) nodules deserve special consideration in this context, since it has been reported that they are more likely to be malignant than solid nodules. However, due to relatively low contrast and indistinct boundaries of GGO nodules, segmentation is more difficult for GGO nodules compared with solid nodules. To overcome this difficulty, we propose a method for accurately segmenting not only solid nodules but also GGO nodules without prior information about nodule types. First, the histogram of CT values in pre-extracted lung regions is modeled by a Gaussian mixture model and a threshold value for including high-attenuation regions is computed. Second, after setting up a region of interest around the nodule seed point, foreground regions are extracted by using the threshold and quick-shift-based mode seeking. Finally, for separating vessels from the nodule, a vessel-likelihood map derived from elongatedness of foreground regions is computed, and a region growing scheme starting from the seed point is applied to the map with the aid of fast marching method. Experimental results using an anthropomorphic chest phantom showed that our method yielded generally lower volumetric measurement errors for both solid and GGO nodules compared with other methods reported in preceding studies conducted using similar technical settings. Also, our method allowed reasonable segmentation of GGO nodules in low-dose images and could be applied to clinical CT images including part-solid nodules.

[1]  J. A. Sethian,et al.  Fast Marching Methods , 1999, SIAM Rev..

[2]  K. Marten,et al.  Inadequacy of manual measurements compared to automated CT volumetry in assessment of treatment response of pulmonary metastases using RECIST criteria , 2006, European Radiology.

[3]  Sang Min Lee,et al.  A Comparison of Two Commercial Volumetry Software Programs in the Analysis of Pulmonary Ground-Glass Nodules: Segmentation Capability and Measurement Accuracy , 2013, Korean journal of radiology.

[4]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Muliscale Vessel Enhancement Filtering , 1998, MICCAI.

[5]  Volumetric measurement of pulmonary nodule using an ultra low dose multi-detector-row CT: phantom study , 2013 .

[6]  S. Matsumoto,et al.  Computer-aided detection of lung nodules on multidetector row computed tomography using three-dimensional analysis of nodule candidates and their surroundings , 2008, Radiation Medicine.

[7]  Jin Mo Goo,et al.  Automatic segmentation of ground-glass opacity nodule on chest CT images by histogram modeling and local contrast , 2012, Medical Imaging.

[8]  Kazuo Awai,et al.  Computer-aided volumetry of pulmonary nodules exhibiting ground-glass opacity at MDCT. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  M. Roizen Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening , 2012 .

[10]  Jan-Martin Kuhnigk,et al.  Computer-aided segmentation and volumetry of artificial ground-glass nodules at chest CT. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  Jong Hyo Kim,et al.  Automated volumetric segmentation method for computerizeddiagnosis of pure nodular ground-glass opacity in high-resolution CT , 2010, Medical Imaging.

[12]  O. Miettinen,et al.  CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  Stefano Soatto,et al.  Quick Shift and Kernel Methods for Mode Seeking , 2008, ECCV.

[14]  L. Bonomo,et al.  Automated volumetry of pulmonary nodules on multidetector CT: influence of slice thickness, reconstruction algorithm and tube current. Preliminary results , 2008, La radiologia medica.

[15]  Eric A. Hoffman,et al.  Automatic lung segmentation for accurate quantitation of volumetric X-ray CT images , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.