Oxygen blast furnace with CO2 capture and storage at an integrated steel mill—Part I: Technical concept analysis

Abstract In this study application of OBF with and without CCS to an integrated steel mill is investigated. The study is based on the real, Ruukki Metals Ltd.’s existing steel mill, located in the city of Raahe, Finland. Implications of application of OBF to energy and mass balances at the site are studied. Based on the technical evaluation, costs and feasibility for carbon capture are estimated. The energy and mass balance basis is presented in this first part of the series of two papers. Costs, feasibility and sensitivity analysis are assessed in the second part of the series (Tsupari et al. 2014. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control). The impact of applying OBF at an integrated steel mill is evaluated based on a consequential assessment following the methodology of Arasto et al. (2013). Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 16 (August) pp. 271–277 concentrating only on the parts of the steelmaking processes affected by the deployment of OBF and CO 2 capture. The technical processes, CO 2 capture and the steelmaking processes affected were modelled using Aspen Plus process modelling software and the results were used to estimate the CO 2 emission reduction potential with OBF technology at an integrated steel mill. The results show that the CO 2 emission from an iron and steel mill can be significantly reduced by application of an oxygen blast furnace and CCS. By applying only the blast furnace process, the emissions can already be reduced by 1.2 Mt/a without storing the separated CO 2 . If captured CO 2 is also purified and stored permanently, the emission can be further reduced by an additional 1.4 Mt/a. This is a significant reduction considering that the production of the mill stays the same as in the reference case. In addition to carbon footprint of the production, application of oxygen blast furnace also has significant impact on coke consumption and energy balance on the site.

[1]  Antti Arasto,et al.  Post-combustion capture of CO2 at an integrated steel mill: Part I: Technical concept analysis , 2013 .

[2]  Eva Pongrácz,et al.  Bioreducer use in Finnish blast furnace ironmaking - analysis of CO2 emission reduction potential and mitigation cost. , 2014 .

[3]  Lauri Kujanpää,et al.  Cross-border CO2 infrastructure options for a CCS demonstration in Finland , 2011 .

[4]  Jean-Pierre Birat,et al.  The “Cost Tool”: operating and capital costs of existing and breakthrough routes in a future studies framework , 2009 .

[5]  J.-P. Birat,et al.  The “CO2 Tool”: CO2 emissions & energy consumption of existing & breakthrough steelmaking routes , 2009 .

[6]  Christoph Feilmayr,et al.  ULCOS top gas recycling blast furnace process (ULCOS TGRBF) : final report , 2014 .

[7]  Eemeli Tsupari,et al.  Oxygen blast furnace with CO2 capture and storage at an integrated steel mill: Part II: Economic Feasibility in Comparison with Conventional Blast Furnace Highlighting Sensitivities , 2015 .

[8]  I. Hannula,et al.  Liquid transportation fuels via large-scale fluidised-bed gasification of lignocellulosic biomass , 2013 .

[9]  Jiuping Xu,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Control , 2014 .

[10]  Kamel Bennaceur,et al.  CO2 Capture and Storage: A Key Carbon Abatement Option , 2008 .

[11]  Eemeli Tsupari,et al.  Post-combustion capture of CO2 at an integrated steel mill – Part II: Economic feasibility , 2013 .

[12]  J van der Stel,et al.  Top gas recycling blast furnace developments for ‘green’ and sustainable ironmaking , 2013 .

[13]  Nawshad Haque,et al.  Biomass as a Source of Renewable Carbon for Iron and Steelmaking , 2012 .