Open standards and the problem with submarine patents

Standardization is essential in industries such as ICT in which network effects are strong, and product compatibility and interoperability have comprehensve benefits. The objective ofstandardization is to promote industry-wide acceptance ofnew technologies. Although non-proprietary standards are often preferred, proprietary technology may have technical benefits, and it may therefore be rational to choose that for a standard. Whenever someone can claim control over a technology, however, conflicts of interest are likely to result. Indeed,the relationship between patents and open standards is problematic. The patent policies of standards organizations aim to reduce these conflicts: participants are typically encouraged to disclose essential patents and to license them on a royalty-free basis or on reasonable and non-discriminatory terms. Unfortunately disclose and licensing requirements are often inadequate and it is possible that patents claiming standardized technology surface after the establishment of a standard. This paper examines whether U.S. antitrust and EC competition laws could be applied with a view to diminishing the submarine patent problem.

[1]  Scott O. Bradner Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology , 2004, RFC.

[2]  Victor Berman Is it time to reexamine patent policy for standards? , 2005, IEEE Des. Test Comput..

[3]  Stuart J. H. Graham,et al.  Submarines in software? continuations in US software patenting in the 1980s and 1990s , 2004 .

[4]  Robert C. Megantz Technology Management: Developing and Implementing Effective Licensing Programs , 2002 .

[5]  Jennifer E. Gully Image Technical Services, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co. , 1998 .

[6]  D. Balto,et al.  Intellectual Property and Antitrust: General Principles , 2003 .

[7]  J. Kipnis Beating the system: abuses of the standards adoption process , 2000 .

[8]  David Clark Do Web Standards and Patents Mix? , 2002, Computer.

[9]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Choosing the Rules for Formal Standardization , 2002 .

[10]  Gary Lea,et al.  Telecommunications standardization and intellectual property rights: a fundamental dilemma? , 1995, STAN.

[11]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  Information rules - a strategic guide to the network economy , 1999 .

[12]  W. F. Heinze Dead patents walking , 2002 .

[13]  Linda A.J. Senden,et al.  Soft Law, Self-Regulation and Co-Regulation in European Law: Where Do They Meet? , 2006 .

[14]  Knut Blind,et al.  Interrelation between patenting and standardisation strategies: empirical evidence and policy implications , 2004 .

[15]  Thomas A. Hemphill Technology standards development, patent ambush, and US antitrust policy , 2005 .

[16]  Björn Hjelm,et al.  Standards and Intellectual Property Rights in the Age of Global Communication - A Review of the International Standardization of Third-Generation Mobile System , 2001, ArXiv.

[17]  Mark A. Lemley Intellectual Property Rights and Standard-Setting Organizations , 2002 .

[18]  Andrew Brown,et al.  Managing Intellectual Capital , 2005 .

[19]  Carl Shapiro,et al.  Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard Setting , 2000, Innovation Policy and the Economy.

[20]  Robert C. Megantz Technology management , 2002 .