Numerical Model for Analyzing Slug Tests in Vertical Cutoff Walls

Analysis of a slug test estimating the hydraulic conductivity of a vertical cutoff wall is complicated by the high compressibility of backfill materials and by the proximity of a well to the edge of the cutoff wall. An implicit finite-difference program, named Slug_3, was developed to analyze results of slug tests in the vertical cutoff wall. The program uses block-centered mesh formulation, considers variable hydraulic conductivity and specific storage, and has automatic time-step control and mesh generation. The geometry and flux-boundary condition in the well-intake section is fully considered, and the interface between a cutoff wall and natural soil formation is modeled as a constant head-boundary condition. Also, a filter cake can be simulated in Slug_3. Slug_3 is verified by comparing results with an analytical solution for a partially penetrating well in aquifers and another numerical code, MODFLOW-96, for a vertical cutoff wall. The program provides a new analytic tool for analyzing slug-test results from vertical cutoff walls and is unique in the ability to simulate variable hydraulic properties, which can be particularly important for highly compressible materials such as soil-bentonite backfill in a cutoff wall.

[1]  R. Whitman,et al.  Soil mechanics, SI version , 1969 .

[2]  George M. Filz,et al.  DETERMINING HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY OF SOIL-BENTONITE USING THE API FILTER PRESS , 2001 .

[3]  Samuel P. Clemence,et al.  In-Place Permeability Measurement of Slurry Trench Cutoff Walls , 1986 .

[4]  J. D. Bredehoeft,et al.  Response of a finite-diameter well to an instantaneous charge of water. Paper No. H-21 , 1966 .

[5]  J. J. Butler,et al.  The Design, Performance, and Analysis of Slug Tests , 1997 .

[6]  Paul B. Crawford,et al.  A New And Fast Method For Solving Large Numbers Of Reservoir Simulation Equations , 1973 .

[7]  James J. Butler,et al.  Slug tests in partially penetrating wells , 1994 .

[8]  Jr . James J. Butler,et al.  Slug tests in site characterization; some practical considerations , 1996 .

[9]  K. Terzaghi,et al.  Stability and Stiffness of Cellular Cofferdams , 1945 .

[10]  H. Bouwer.  The Bouwer and Rice Slug Test — An Updatea , 1989 .

[11]  D. E. Daniel,et al.  Slug test analysis in vertical cutoff walls. I: Analysis methods , 2006 .

[12]  James K. Mitchell,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF BARRIER CONTAINMENT TECHNOLOGIES , 1997 .

[13]  T. Narasimhan,et al.  An Evaluation of the Bouwer and Rice Method of Slug Test Analysis , 1995 .

[14]  H. Bouwer,et al.  A slug test for determining hydraulic conductivity of unconfined aquifers with completely or partially penetrating wells , 1976 .

[15]  George M. Filz,et al.  Formation and Properties of Bentonite Filter Cakes , 1998 .

[16]  Gholamreza Mesri,et al.  Settlement analysis of embankments on soft clays , 1985 .

[17]  T. N. Narasimhan,et al.  Improved Interpretation of Hvorslev Tests , 1994 .

[18]  HangSeok Choi.  Analysis of Slug Tests to Determine Hydraulic Conductivity of Vertical Cutoff Walls , 2002 .

[19]  D. E. Daniel,et al.  Slug Test Analysis in Vertical Cutoff Walls. II: Applications , 2006 .

[20]  G. Mesri,et al.  Theory of consolidation of clays , 1974 .

[21]  G. Pinder.  An iterative digital model for aquifer evaluation , 1969 .

[22]  S. Leroueil,et al.  The permeability of natural soft clays. Part II: Permeability characteristics: Reply , 1983 .

[23]  John D. Bredehoeft,et al.  On the analysis of ‘slug test’ data , 1973 .