Some implications of linear-quadratic-linear radiation dose-response with regard to hypofractionation.

Recent technological advances enable radiation therapy to be delivered in a highly conformal manner to targets located almost anywhere in the body. This capability has renewed the clinical interest in hypofractionation wherein the tumor is delivered a few fractions of very large dose per fraction. Extrapolating clinical experience from conventional regimens to fractions of high dose is important to designing hypofractionated treatments. The concept of biologically effective dose (BED) based on the linear-quadratic (LQ) formulation e(-(alphaD+betaD2) is a useful tool for intercomparing conventional fractionations but may be hampered if the value of alpha/beta is dose range dependent and/or when extrapolating to fractions of high dose because the LQ curve bends continuously on the log-linear plot. This does not coincide with what is observed experimentally in many clonogenic cell survival studies at high dose wherein radiation dose-response relationships more closely approximate a straight line. Intercomparison of conventional fractionations with hypofractionated regimens may benefit from BED calculations which instead use a dose range independent linear-quadratic-linear (LQ-L) formulation which better fits the experimental data across a wider range of dose. The dosimetric implications of LQ-L are explored using a simple model which requires only the specification of a dose D(T) at which the LQ curve transitions to final linearity and the log(e) cell kill per Gy in the final linear portion of the survival curve at high dose. It is shown that the line tangent to the LQ curve at transition dose D(T) can often be used to approximate the final slope of the dose response curve. When D(T) = 2alpha/ beta Gy, the line tangent to the LQ curve at D(T) intersects the e(-alphaD) and e(-betaD2) curves at dose alpha/ beta Gy and also closely fits the linear response in the high dose region of some classic in vitro cell survival curves for which the value of alpha/beta is low. It is hypothesized that D(T) will increase as the magnitude of alpha/beta increases. Examples are presented illustrating how to recognize LQ-L behavior in multifraction isoeffect studies of late responses such as spinal cord and lung. When planning hypofractionated regimens involving reactions with low alpha/beta, recognizing LQ-L behavior could be important because the dose-response is likely to transition to final linearity within the contemplated range of hypofractional doses.

[1]  David J Brenner,et al.  Hypofractionation for prostate cancer radiotherapy--what are the issues? , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  T. Puck,et al.  ACTION OF X-RAYS ON MAMMALIAN CELLS , 1956, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[3]  Alan E. Nahum,et al.  The modified linear-quadratic model of Guerrero and Li can be derived from a mechanistic basis and exhibits linear-quadratic-linear behaviour , 2005 .

[4]  X Allen Li,et al.  Extending the linear-quadratic model for large fraction doses pertinent to stereotactic radiotherapy. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  R. Dale,et al.  Derivation of the optimum dose per fraction from the linear quadratic model. , 1995, The British journal of radiology.

[6]  G. Barendsen,et al.  Dose fractionation, dose rate and iso-effect relationships for normal tissue responses. , 1982, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  D. Paulson,et al.  Isolation of a human prostate carcinoma cell line (DU 145) , 1978, International journal of cancer.

[8]  Nina A. Mayr,et al.  A Generalized Linear-Quadratic Formula for High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy and Radiosurgery , 2007 .

[9]  D. Wilkins,et al.  α/β ratio: A dose range dependence study , 2007 .

[10]  Lech Papiez,et al.  Universal survival curve and single fraction equivalent dose: useful tools in understanding potency of ablative radiotherapy. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  John D Fenwick,et al.  A challenge to traditional radiation oncology. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  A. Hercbergs,et al.  Radiobiological studies of PC-3 and DU-145 human prostate cancer cells: x-ray sensitivity in vitro and hypoxic fractions of xenografted tumors in vivo. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  M. M. ELKIND,et al.  X-Ray Damage and Recovery in Mammalian Cells in Culture , 1959, Nature.

[14]  P Okunieff,et al.  Radiation dose-response of human tumors. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  M. M. Elkind,et al.  Repair of Cell Killing and Neoplastic Transformation at Reduced Dose Rates of 60Co γ-Rays , 1980 .

[16]  J. Fowler The linear-quadratic formula and progress in fractionated radiotherapy. , 1989, The British journal of radiology.

[17]  J F Fowler,et al.  The effect of multiple small doses of x rays on skin reactions in the mouse and a basic interpretation. , 1976, Radiation research.

[18]  H D Thames,et al.  Time-dose factors in radiotherapy: a review of the human data. , 1990, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[19]  K. Atwood,et al.  On the Interpretation of Multi-Hit Survival Curves. , 1949, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  H. Withers,et al.  Test of equal effect per fraction and estimation of initial clonogen number in microcolony assays of survival after fractionated irradiation. , 1980, The British journal of radiology.

[21]  H. Withers Biologic basis for altered fractionation schemes , 1985, Cancer.