Modelling visual impressions for Chinese and Pakistani ethnic groups

Abstract This work describes an investigation into the relationship between the visual impressions of a number of facial images each described by a set of parameters related to the position and size of discrete components: the eyes, the nose and the lips. Observations were made by members of two ethnic groups, Chinese and Pakistani, and the images comprised female faces from the same two groups. The observers used 16 impression scales to assess each image and a forced-choice scaling technique. From the factor analysis, the results showed that three visual impressions, attractive, feminine and mature, can well represent all the 16 scales. In the second experiment, the observers assessed visual impressions of more images using only these three impressions. Data are presented relating to the differences between the observations for the various facial locations, as well as between observers from different ethnic groups. Models have been developed that describe the data and their predictions outperformed traditional models, i.e.symmetry, golden ratio and neoclassical canons. The differences between the results of the two ethnic groups were found to be small; there were however, some significant differences in the responses to different facial features.

[1]  Ran R. Hassin,et al.  Facing faces: studies on the cognitive aspects of physiognomy. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  Andrea Bottino,et al.  Computer analysis of face beauty: A survey , 2014, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[3]  Joann M. Montepare,et al.  Impressions of Babyfaced Individuals Across the Life Span , 1992 .

[4]  M. Cunningham Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty , 1986 .

[5]  L. Chrostek,et al.  Impact of face proportions on face attractiveness , 2018, Journal of cosmetic dermatology.

[6]  J. Langlois,et al.  What Is Average and What Is Not Average About Attractive Faces? , 1994 .

[7]  K. Grammer,et al.  Facial symmetry and judgements of attractiveness, health and personality , 2006 .

[8]  A. Young,et al.  The human face , 1982 .

[9]  Roberto Deli,et al.  Do the neoclassical canons still describe the beauty of faces? An anthropometric study on 50 Caucasian models. , 2010, Progress in orthodontics.

[10]  Joseph L. Zinnes,et al.  Theory and Methods of Scaling. , 1958 .

[11]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Facial masculinity and fluctuating asymmetry , 2003 .

[12]  Ulrik Plesner Jacobsen,et al.  Interpretation of Appearance: The Effect of Facial Features on First Impressions and Personality , 2014, PloS one.

[13]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Asymmetry and human facial attractiveness: symmetry may not always be beautiful , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  Arsalane Zarghili,et al.  Facial beauty analysis by age and gender , 2019, International Journal of Intelligent Systems Technologies and Applications.

[15]  Roy S. Berns,et al.  Methods for characterizing CRT displays , 1996 .

[16]  M. Luo,et al.  The development of the CIE 2000 Colour Difference Formula , 2001 .

[17]  S J McKelvie,et al.  Effects of Feature Variations on Attributions for Schematic Faces , 1993, Psychological reports.

[18]  Ashok Samal,et al.  Computation of a face attractiveness index based on neoclassical canons, symmetry, and golden ratios , 2008, Pattern Recognit..

[19]  A. Workman,et al.  A plastic surgeon's guide to applying smartphone technology in patient care. , 2013, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[20]  Peter A. Rhodes,et al.  A study of digital camera colorimetric characterisation based on polynomial modelling , 2001 .

[21]  Virginia Andreoli Mathie,et al.  Face facts: An unbidden role for features in communication , 1982 .

[22]  P. Costa,et al.  The five-factor theory of personality. , 2008 .

[23]  Diane S. Berry,et al.  Facial maturity and daily social interaction , 1997 .

[24]  Sampo V. Paunonen,et al.  Facial features as personality cues , 1999 .

[25]  Kaida Xiao,et al.  New spectral data for skin colours , 2016 .

[26]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Attractiveness of Facial Averageness and Symmetry in Non-Western Cultures: In Search of Biologically Based Standards of Beauty , 2001, Perception.

[27]  Bo Li,et al.  Label Distribution-Based Facial Attractiveness Computation by Deep Residual Learning , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[28]  I R Munro,et al.  Vertical and horizontal proportions of the face in young adult North American Caucasians: revision of neoclassical canons. , 1985, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[29]  A. Mohan,et al.  iGuide to plastic surgery: iPhone apps, the plastic surgeon, and the health care environment. , 2012, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[30]  Ashok Samal,et al.  Advances in computational facial attractiveness methods , 2016, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[31]  I. Jolliffe Principal Component Analysis , 2002 .

[32]  Patrick Pérez,et al.  Poisson image editing , 2003, ACM Trans. Graph..

[33]  Pamela M. Pallett,et al.  New “golden” ratios for facial beauty , 2010, Vision Research.

[34]  S C Rhee,et al.  Differences between Caucasian and Asian attractive faces , 2018, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[35]  David Zhang,et al.  Quantitative analysis of human facial beauty using geometric features , 2011, Pattern Recognit..