Double Auctions for Dynamic Spectrum Allocation

Wireless spectrum is a precious resource and must be allocated and used efficiently. Conventional spectrum allocations let a government agency (e.g., FCC) sell a portion of spectrum to one provider. This is not only restrictive, but also limits spectrum reuse and may lead to significant under-utilization of spectrum. In this paper, we develop a novel truthful double-auction scheme to let any resource owner (e.g., a cellular provider), who has spare spectrum at a given time period, sell to one or more providers that need additional spectrum at that time. Spectrum auctions are fundamentally different from conventional auction problems since spectrum can be reused and competition among buyers is complex due to wireless interference. Our proposal is the first double-auction design for spectrum allocation that explicitly decouples the buyer-side and seller-side auction design while achieving: 1) truthfulness; 2) individual rationality; and 3) budget-balance. To accurately capture wireless interference and support spectrum reuse, we partition the conflict graph so that buyers with strong direct and indirect interference are put into the same subgraph, and buyers with no interference or weak interference are put into separate subgraphs. Then, we compute pricing independently within each subgraph. We then develop a scheme to combine spectrum allocation results from different subgraphs and resolve potential conflicts. We further extend our approach to support local sellers whose spectrum can only be sold to buyers within certain regions, instead of all buyers. Using conflict graphs generated from real cell tower locations, we extensively evaluate our approach and demonstrate that it achieves high efficiency, revenue, and utilization.

[1]  Li Li,et al.  A discriminatory pricing double auction for spectrum allocation , 2012, 2012 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC).

[2]  Ulrike von Luxburg,et al.  A tutorial on spectral clustering , 2007, Stat. Comput..

[3]  Gang Wang,et al.  Practical conflict graphs for dynamic spectrum distribution , 2013, SIGMETRICS '13.

[4]  XiaoHua Xu,et al.  TODA: Truthful Online Double Auction for Spectrum Allocation in Wireless Networks , 2010, 2010 IEEE Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum (DySPAN).

[5]  Fan Wu,et al.  SMALL: A Strategy-proof Mechanism for radio spectrum allocation , 2011, 2011 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[6]  M. Satterthwaite,et al.  Efficient Mechanisms for Bilateral Trading , 1983 .

[7]  Haichen Shen,et al.  Enable flexible spectrum access with spectrum virtualization , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks.

[8]  PadhyeJitendra,et al.  Impact of interference on multi-hop wireless network performance , 2005 .

[9]  Fan Wu,et al.  SPRING: A Strategy-proof and Privacy preserving spectrum auction mechanism , 2013, 2013 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[10]  Xia Zhou,et al.  eBay in the Sky: strategy-proof wireless spectrum auctions , 2008, MobiCom '08.

[11]  Enxin Yao,et al.  An efficient truthful double spectrum auction design for dynamic spectrum access , 2011, 2011 6th International ICST Conference on Cognitive Radio Oriented Wireless Networks and Communications (CROWNCOM).

[12]  Johann Hurink,et al.  A Robust PTAS for Maximum Weight Independent Sets in Unit Disk Graphs , 2004, WG.

[13]  Sangki Yun,et al.  Fine-grained spectrum adaptation in WiFi networks , 2013, MobiCom.

[14]  S. Katti,et al.  Picasso: flexible RF and spectrum slicing , 2012, CCRV.

[15]  H. Varian Online Ad Auctions , 2009 .

[16]  S. P. Lloyd,et al.  Least squares quantization in PCM , 1982, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[17]  R. McAfee,et al.  A dominant strategy double auction , 1992 .

[18]  Leandros Tassiulas,et al.  An iterative double auction for mobile data offloading , 2013, 2013 11th International Symposium and Workshops on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc and Wireless Networks (WiOpt).

[19]  Lili Qiu,et al.  Estimation of link interference in static multi-hop wireless networks , 2005, IMC '05.

[20]  Rica Gonen,et al.  Generalized trade reduction mechanisms , 2007, EC '07.

[21]  Konstantina Papagiannaki,et al.  PIE in the Sky: Online Passive Interference Estimation for Enterprise WLANs , 2011, NSDI.

[22]  Srinivasan Keshav,et al.  SMARTA: a self-managing architecture for thin access points , 2006, CoNEXT '06.

[23]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  On Spectral Clustering: Analysis and an algorithm , 2001, NIPS.

[24]  Xia Zhou,et al.  TRUST: A General Framework for Truthful Double Spectrum Auctions , 2009, IEEE INFOCOM 2009.

[25]  Jianbo Shi,et al.  A Random Walks View of Spectral Segmentation , 2001, AISTATS.

[26]  Baochun Li,et al.  District: Embracing local markets in truthful spectrum double auctions , 2011, 2011 8th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks.

[27]  Andrei Lapets,et al.  Restricted Truthful Combinatorial Auction Mechanisms , 2007 .

[28]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[29]  Bo Li,et al.  TAHES: A Truthful Double Auction Mechanism for Heterogeneous Spectrums , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[30]  Lili Qiu,et al.  Impact of Interference on Multi-Hop Wireless Network Performance , 2003, MobiCom '03.