The impact of network structure on innovation efficiency: An agent-based study in the context of innovation networks

This article investigates the impact of network structure on innovation efficiency by establishing a simulation model of innovation process in the context of innovation networks. The results indicate that short path lengths between vertices are conductive to high efficiency of explorative innovations, dense clusters are conductive to high efficiency of exploitative innovations, and high small-worldness is conductive to high efficiency of the hybrid of these two innovations. Moreover, we discussed the reason of the results and give some suggestions to innovators and innovation policy makers. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Complexity 21: 111-122, 2015

[1]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[2]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[3]  Sophia Rabe-Hesketh,et al.  Structural Equation Models , 2005 .

[4]  Mooweon Rhee,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation , 2016 .

[5]  Michael Fritsch,et al.  Innovation by Networking: An Economic Perspective , 2001 .

[6]  R. Sternberg Innovation Networks and Regional Development—Evidence from the European Regional Innovation Survey (ERIS): Theoretical Concepts, Methodological Approach, Empirical Basis and Introduction to the Theme Issue , 2000 .

[7]  S. Shane,et al.  The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research , 2000 .

[8]  Erwin Danneels The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences , 2002 .

[9]  B. Eaton,et al.  Technology-Traditing Coalitions in Supergames , 1997 .

[10]  Nicolas Jonard,et al.  Knowledge Dynamics in a Network Industry , 2004 .

[11]  D. Watts Networks, Dynamics, and the Small‐World Phenomenon1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[13]  Robin Cowan,et al.  Network Structure and the Diffusion of Knowledge , 2004 .

[14]  O. D. Duncan Path Analysis: Sociological Examples , 1966, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[16]  Nieves Arranz,et al.  Complex joint R&D projects: From empirical evidence to managerial implications , 2009 .

[17]  Jianmin He,et al.  Fitness model for tiered structure in the interbank market , 2012, Complex..

[18]  E. Penrose The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[19]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation and Peformance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[20]  Timothy N. Carroll,et al.  The Coevolution of New Organizational Forms , 1999 .

[21]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Resource-based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms , 1996 .

[22]  Jongseok Lee,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in the Presence of Network Externalities , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[23]  J. Coleman Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[24]  S. Borgatti,et al.  The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology , 2003 .

[25]  Dusya Vera,et al.  Strategic Leadership and Organizational Learning , 2004 .

[26]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[27]  I. Nonaka,et al.  A firm as a knowledge-creating entity: a new perspective on the theory of the firm , 2000 .

[28]  Lee Fleming,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Recombinant Uncertainty in Technological Search , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[29]  Thomas W. Valente Network models of the diffusion of innovations , 1996, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[30]  R. Grant Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[31]  David L. Deeds,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation Alliances in Biotechnology: A System of New Product Development , 2004 .

[32]  Amitabh Sinha,et al.  Efficient Structures for Innovative Social Networks , 2009, Manag. Sci..