Heterogeneity, Brokerage and Innovative Performance: Endogenous Formation of Collaborative Inventor Networks

In this study, I examine how past performance influences the relative positions of actors in a network and how the actor-level heterogeneity in quality mediates the often-demonstrated association between brokerage and performance. On the collaboration network of U.S. biotech inventors during 1976--1995, I find that inventors with superior track records are more apt to form collaboration ties that enhance brokerage, thereby occupying positions that allow them to broker across network boundaries. Controlling for past performance significantly weakens the positive relationship between brokering position and innovative performance. Furthermore, when inventor-level heterogeneity is controlled for through inventor fixed effects, the position-performance correlation disappears. These findings suggest that, at least for collaborative inventors, actor-level heterogeneity such as performance history largely drives the asymmetry in brokerage, explaining most of the position--performance association.

[1]  Steven R. Lerman,et al.  The Estimation of Choice Probabilities from Choice Based Samples , 1977 .

[2]  James N. Baron,et al.  Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace , 1997 .

[3]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[4]  Andrew V. Shipilov,et al.  DANCING WITH STRANGERS: ASPIRATION PERFORMANCE AND THE SEARCH FOR UNDERWRITING SYNDICATE PARTNERS. , 2004 .

[5]  R. Merton The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.

[6]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[7]  Alfred J. Lotka,et al.  The frequency distribution of scientific productivity , 1926 .

[8]  L. Fleming Recombinant Uncertainty in Technological Search Lee Fleming , 2001 .

[9]  M. Brewer,et al.  Intellectual Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises , 1994 .

[10]  Olav Sorenson,et al.  Brokers and Competitive Advantage , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[11]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  Patent Quality and Research Productivity: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators , 2004 .

[12]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[13]  Matthew O. Jackson,et al.  The Economics of Social Networks , 2005 .

[14]  Simon Rodan,et al.  More than Network Structure: How Knowledge Heterogeneity Influences Managerial Performance and Innovativeness , 2004 .

[15]  T. Allen Managing the flow of technology , 1977 .

[16]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[17]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[18]  A. Shipilov Network Strategies and Performance of Canadian Investment Banks , 2006 .

[19]  H. Zuckerman Nobel laureates in science: patterns of productivity, collaboration, and authorship. , 1967, American sociological review.

[20]  Geoffrey G. Bell,et al.  Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance , 2005 .

[21]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  Networks, Diversity, and Productivity: The Social Capital of Corporate R&D Teams , 2001 .

[22]  S. Cosslett,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimator for choice-based samples , 1981 .

[23]  W. Powell,et al.  Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[24]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Decay functions , 2000, Soc. Networks.

[25]  Roger V. Gould The Origins of Status Hierarchies: A Formal Theory and Empirical Test1 , 2002, American Journal of Sociology.

[26]  L. Fleming Brokerage vs . Cohesion and Collaborative Creativity : An Evolutionary Resolution , 2005 .

[27]  R. Burt Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[28]  Estelle Brodman,et al.  Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information Within the R&D Organization (Book Review) , 1978 .

[29]  J. Heckman Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[30]  Roberto M. Fernandez,et al.  Social Capital at Work: Networks and Employment at a Phone Center , 2000, American Journal of Sociology.

[31]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[32]  Akbar Zaheer,et al.  Network Memory: The Influence of Past and Current Networks on Performance , 2004 .

[33]  Atul Nerkar,et al.  Evolution of R&D Capabilities: The Role of Knowledge Networks Within a Firm , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[34]  R. Merton The Matthew Effect in Science, II: Cumulative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual Property , 1988, Isis.

[35]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship , 1984 .

[36]  G. Ahuja Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[37]  L. Zucker,et al.  Movement of Star Scientists and Engineers and High-Tech Firm Entry , 2006 .

[38]  R. Burt The contingent value of social capital. , 1997 .

[39]  M. Arellano,et al.  Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations , 1991 .

[40]  B. Hamilton,et al.  Correcting for Endogeneity in Strategic Management Research , 2003 .

[41]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[42]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  'Names Game': Harnessing Inventors Patent Data for Economic Research , 2006 .

[43]  Arthur J. Keown,et al.  Do strategic alliances create value , 1997 .

[44]  Sanjeev Goyal,et al.  A Noncooperative Model of Network Formation , 2000 .

[45]  Michelle Gittelman,et al.  Does Good Science Lead to Valuable Knowledge? Biotechnology Firms and the Evolutionary Logic of Citation Patterns , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[46]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range , 2003 .

[47]  M. Trajtenberg A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[48]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[49]  D. McFadden Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[50]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Personality correlates of structural holes , 1998 .

[51]  R. Gulati,et al.  Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[52]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[53]  L. Fleming,et al.  Collaborative Brokerage, Generative Creativity, and Creative Success , 2007 .

[54]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[55]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[56]  David Obstfeld Social Networks, the Tertius Iungens Orientation, and Involvement in Innovation , 2005 .

[57]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Syndication Networks and the Spatial Distribution of Venture Capital Investments1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[58]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[59]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Collaborative Networks as Determinants of Knowledge Diffusion Patterns , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[60]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Industry Effects and Appropriability Measures in the Stock Markets Valuation of R&D and Patents , 1987 .

[61]  M. Tushman Special Boundary Roles in the Innovation Process. , 1977 .