Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability

Three methods for fitting the diffusion model (Ratcliff, 1978) to experimental data are examined. Sets of simulated data were generated with known parameter values, and from fits of the model, we found that the maximum likelihood method was better than the chi-square and weighted least squares methods by criteria of bias in the parameters relative to the parameter values used to generate the data and standard deviations in the parameter estimates. The standard deviations in the parameter values can be used as measures of the variability in parameter estimates from fits to experimental data. We introduced contaminant reaction times and variability into the other components of processing besides the decision process and found that the maximum likelihood and chi-square methods failed, sometimes dramatically. But the weighted least squares method was robust to these two factors. We then present results from modifications of the maximum likelihood and chi-square methods, in which these factors are explicitly modeled, and show that the parameter values of the diffusion model are recovered well. We argue that explicit modeling is an important method for addressing contaminants and variability in nondecision processes and that it can be applied in any theoretical approach to modeling reaction time.

[1]  L. M. M.-T. Theory of Probability , 1929, Nature.

[2]  G Kendall Maurice,et al.  The Advanced Theory Of Statistics Vol-i , 1943 .

[3]  R. Fisher The Advanced Theory of Statistics , 1943, Nature.

[4]  Feller William,et al.  An Introduction To Probability Theory And Its Applications , 1950 .

[5]  E. L. Lehmann,et al.  Theory of point estimation , 1950 .

[6]  D. Lindley Grouping corrections and maximum likelihood equations , 1950, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[7]  Maurice G. Kendall The advanced theory of statistics , 1958 .

[8]  M. Stone Models for choice-reaction time , 1960 .

[9]  D. LaBerge A recruitment theory of simple behavior , 1962 .

[10]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[11]  R. Audley,et al.  SOME ALTERNATIVE STOCHASTIC MODELS OF CHOICE1 , 1965 .

[12]  N. L. Johnson,et al.  Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications , 1966 .

[13]  R. Ollman Fast guesses in choice reaction time , 1966 .

[14]  William Feller,et al.  An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications , 1967 .

[15]  Donald Laming,et al.  Information theory of choice-reaction times , 1968 .

[16]  D. Vickers,et al.  Evidence for an accumulator model of psychophysical discrimination. , 1970, Ergonomics.

[17]  Douglas Vickers,et al.  Discriminating between the frequency of occurrence of two alternative events , 1971 .

[18]  J. Yellott Correction for fast guessing and the speed-accuracy tradeoff in choice reaction time , 1971 .

[19]  Richard G. Swensson,et al.  The elusive tradeoff: Speed vs accuracy in visual discrimination tasks , 1972 .

[20]  G. Mandler,et al.  Retrieval processes in recognition , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[21]  Calyampudi R. Rao,et al.  Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications. , 1975 .

[22]  S. Link The relative judgment theory of two choice response time , 1975 .

[23]  M. Kupperman Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications 2nd Edition (C. Radhakrishna Rao) , 1975 .

[24]  S. Link,et al.  A sequential theory of psychological discrimination , 1975 .

[25]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Retrieval Processes in Recognition Memory , 1976 .

[26]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[27]  D. Vickers Decision processes in visual perception , 1979 .

[28]  R. Ratcliff Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[29]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A note on modeling accumulation of information when the rate of accumulation changes over time , 1980 .

[30]  Russell C. H. Cheng,et al.  Maximum likelihood Estimation of Parameters in the Inverse Gaussian Distribution, With Unknown Origin , 1981 .

[31]  R. Ratcliff Theoretical interpretations of the speed and accuracy of positive and negative responses. , 1985, Psychological review.

[32]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  The accumulator model of two-choice discrimination , 1988 .

[33]  R Ratcliff,et al.  Continuous versus discrete information processing modeling accumulation of partial information. , 1988, Psychological review.

[34]  Obtaining meaningful results from Fourier deconvolution of reaction time data. , 1990 .

[35]  P. Smith,et al.  Obtaining meaningful results from Fourier deconvolution of reaction time data. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[36]  J. Townsend,et al.  Fundamental derivations from decision field theory , 1992 .

[37]  J. Townsend,et al.  Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. , 1993, Psychological review.

[38]  R. Ratcliff Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[39]  R. Ulrich,et al.  Effects of truncation on reaction time analysis. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[40]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Strategies and automaticity. I: Basic findings and conceptual framework , 1994 .

[41]  Effects of truncation on reaction time , 1994 .

[42]  Philip L. Smith Psychophysically principled models of visual simple reaction time. , 1995 .

[43]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Statistical mimicking of reaction time data: Single-process models, parameter variability, and mixtures , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[44]  Diederich,et al.  Dynamic Stochastic Models for Decision Making under Time Constraints , 1997, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[45]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Modeling Response Times for Two-Choice Decisions , 1998 .

[46]  D. Balota,et al.  Word frequency, repetition, and lexicality effects in word recognition tasks: beyond measures of central tendency. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[47]  Richard F. Gunst,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis , 1999, Technometrics.

[48]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. , 1999, Psychological review.

[49]  T. Zandt,et al.  Time-dependent Poisson counter models of response latency in simple judgment. , 2000, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[50]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  A diffusion model account of masking in two-choice letter identification. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[51]  T. Zandt,et al.  How to fit a response time distribution , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[52]  R Ratcliff,et al.  The effects of aging on reaction time in a signal detection task. , 2001, Psychology and aging.

[53]  J. Townsend,et al.  Multialternative Decision Field Theory: A Dynamic Connectionist Model of Decision Making , 2001 .

[54]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A comparison of four methods for simulating the diffusion process , 2001, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[55]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  The effects of aging on reaction time in a signal detection task. , 2001, Psychology and aging.

[56]  R. Ratcliff A diffusion model account of response time and accuracy in a brightness discrimination task: Fitting real data and failing to fit fake but plausible data , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[57]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  Quantile maximum likelihood estimation of response time distributions , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[58]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. , 2004, Psychological review.

[59]  U. Schimank,et al.  Diffusion and Random Walk Processes , 2022 .