Splitting the Beam: Distribution of Attention Over Noncontiguous Regions of the Visual Field

In an effort to examine the flexibility with which attention can be allocated in visual space, we investigated whether subjects could selectively attend to multiple noncontiguous locations in the visual field We examined this issue by precuing two separate areas of the visual field and requiring subjects to decide whether the letters that appeared in these locations matched or mismatched while distractors that primed either the match or mismatch response were presented between the cued locations If the distractors had no effect on performance, it would provide evidence that subjects can divide attention over noncontiguous areas of space Subjects were able to ignore the distractors when the targets and distractors were presented as nononset stimuli (i e, when premasks were changed into the targets and distractors) In contrast, when the targets and distractors were presented as sudden-onset stimuli, subjects were unable to ignore the distractors These results begin to define the conditions under which attention can be flexibly deployed to multiple noncontiguous locations in the visual field

[1]  M. Shaw,et al.  Optimal allocation of cognitive resources to spatial locations. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  D. Broadbent Task combination and selective intake of information. , 1982, Acta psychologica.

[4]  J. Jonides Further toward a model of the Mind’s eye’s movement , 1983 .

[5]  J. Duncan Selective attention and the organization of visual information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Allocation of attention in the visual field. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  B. Kröse,et al.  The control and speed of shifts of attention , 1989, Vision Research.

[9]  H. J. Muller,et al.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  D. LaBerge,et al.  Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. , 1989 .

[11]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  A. Kramer,et al.  Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  J. Theeuwes Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Automatization and training in visual search. , 1992, The American journal of psychology.

[16]  James F. Juola,et al.  Relative Effectiveness of Central, Peripheral, and Abrupt-onset Cues in Visual Attention , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[17]  D. Madden,et al.  Selective attention and visual search: revision of an allocation model and application to age differences. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  J. Theeuwes Perceptual selectivity for color and form , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  U. Castiello,et al.  Splitting focal attention. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  S. Yantis Stimulus-Driven Attentional Capture , 1993 .

[21]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Attentional distribution in the visual field duringsame-different judgments as assessed by response competition , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  G. Baylis,et al.  Visual attention and objects: evidence for hierarchical coding of location. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Attention to adjacent and separate positions in space: An electrophysiological analysis , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.