Low demand for nontraditional cookstove technologies

Biomass combustion with traditional cookstoves causes substantial environmental and health harm. Nontraditional cookstove technologies can be efficacious in reducing this adverse impact, but they are adopted and used at puzzlingly low rates. This study analyzes the determinants of low demand for nontraditional cookstoves in rural Bangladesh by using both stated preference (from a nationally representative survey of rural women) and revealed preference (assessed by conducting a cluster-randomized trial of cookstove prices) approaches. We find consistent evidence across both analyses suggesting that the women in rural Bangladesh do not perceive indoor air pollution as a significant health hazard, prioritize other basic developmental needs over nontraditional cookstoves, and overwhelmingly rely on a free traditional cookstove technology and are therefore not willing to pay much for a new nontraditional cookstove. Efforts to improve health and abate environmental harm by promoting nontraditional cookstoves may be more successful by designing and disseminating nontraditional cookstoves with features valued more highly by users, such as reduction of operating costs, even when those features are not directly related to the cookstoves’ health and environmental impacts.

[1]  Chandra Venkataraman,et al.  Global atmospheric impacts of residential fuels , 2004 .

[2]  Jessica Cohen,et al.  Free Distribution or Cost-Sharing? Evidence from a Malaria Prevention Experiment , 2008 .

[3]  Kirk R. Smith,et al.  Co-benefits of climate mitigation and health protection in energy systems: scoping methods. , 2008, Annual review of public health.

[4]  S. Jacobson,et al.  A social and environmental evaluation of fuel-efficient cook-stoves and conservation in Uganda , 1998, Environmental Conservation.

[5]  Matthew Holden.  Cooking by Gas , 2010, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[6]  Bundit Limmeechokchai,et al.  Sustainable energy development strategies in the rural Thailand: The case of the improved cooking stove and the small biogas digester , 2007 .

[7]  Gladys B. Mutangadura,et al.  World Health Report 2002: Reducing Risks, Promoting Healthy Life , 2004 .

[8]  Md. Danesh Miah,et al.  Wood fuel use in the traditional cooking stoves in the rural floodplain areas of Bangladesh: a socio-environmental perspective. , 2009 .

[9]  William S. Breffle,et al.  A Joint Latent-Class Model: Combining Likert-Scale Preference Statements With Choice Data to Harvest Preference Heterogeneity , 2011 .

[10]  Edward E. Leamer,et al.  Report of the NOOA Panel on Contingent Valuation , 1993 .

[11]  Wahidul K. Biswas,et al.  Energy consumption in the domestic sector in a Bangladesh village , 1997 .

[12]  Majid Ezzati,et al.  HOW ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RISKS CHANGE WITH DEVELOPMENT: The Epidemiologic and Environmental Risk Transitions Revisited , 2005 .

[13]  Siddig El Tayeb Muneer,et al.  Adoption of biomass improved cookstoves in a patriarchal society: an example from Sudan. , 2003, The Science of the total environment.

[14]  M. Jashimuddin,et al.  Preference and consumption pattern of biomass fuel in some disregarded villages of Bangladesh , 2006 .

[15]  Daniel M. Kammen,et al.  ENERGY MANAGEMENT AND GLOBAL HEALTH , 2004 .

[16]  Omar Masera,et al.  From cookstoves to cooking systems: the integrated program on sustainable household energy use in Mexico , 2005 .

[17]  Ken R. Smith.  What's Cooking? A Brief Update , 2010 .

[18]  M. Uddin,et al.  Biomass fuel use by the rural households in Chittagong region, Bangladesh , 2003 .

[19]  Ken R. Smith,et al.  Performance testing for monitoring improved biomass stove interventions: experiences of the Household Energy and Health Project , 2007 .

[20]  P. Coffey,et al.  The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development: The World Bank , 2006 .

[21]  David G. Streets,et al.  Greenhouse-gas emissions from biofuel combustion in Asia1This work was carried out at Argonne National Laboratory, managed by the University of Chicago for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. W-31-109-ENG-38.1 , 1999 .

[22]  V. Ramanathan,et al.  Global and regional climate changes due to black carbon , 2008 .

[23]  B. K. Bala,et al.  An integrated rural energy model for a village in Bangladesh , 1990 .

[24]  John W Peabody,et al.  Indoor Air Pollution in Rural China: Cooking Fuels, Stoves, and Health Status , 2005, Archives of environmental & occupational health.

[25]  Shaligram Pokharel,et al.  Promotional issues on alternative energy technologies in Nepal , 2003 .

[26]  E. Morey,et al.  Using Stated-Preference Questions to Investigate Variations in Willingness to Pay for Preserving Marble Monuments: Classic Heterogeneity, Random Parameters, and Mixture Models , 2003 .

[27]  S. D. Pohekar,et al.  Dissemination of cooking energy alternatives in India--a review , 2005 .

[28]  Daniel M Kammen,et al.  Indoor air pollution from biomass combustion and acute respiratory infections in Kenya: an exposure-response study , 2001, The Lancet.

[29]  Rufus Edwards,et al.  An assessment of programs to promote improved household stoves in China , 2004 .

[30]  P. Dupas,et al.  Free Distribution or Cost-Sharing? Evidence from a Randomized Malaria Prevention Experiment , 2007 .

[31]  J. Lawson.  Comparative Quantification of Health Risks. Global and Regional Burden of Disease Attributable to Selected Major Risk Factors , 2006 .

[32]  Huang Kun,et al.  One hundred million improved cookstoves in China: how was it done? , 1993 .

[33]  Omar Masera,et al.  Social perceptions about a technological innovation for fuelwood cooking : Case study in rural Mexico , 2007 .

[34]  Health Effects of Outdoor Air Pollution in Developing Countries of Asia : A Literature Review , 2004 .

[35]  K. R. Smith.  National burden of disease in India from indoor air pollution. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.