Factors affecting drivers' choice of speed on roadway curves

Vehicle speeds depend on factors relating to drivers, vehicles, and the roadway environment. Operational studies show that curvature is the roadway element that is most successful in predicting vehicle speeds. If, however, a causative explanation of drivers' behavior is sought, then attitude surveys are more appropriate than traffic observations. This paper features a survey of 207 Greek drivers who were asked to rate 14 elements of the road environment as to how importantly these influence their choice of speed on interurban road curves. A comparison of responses between drivers who claimed to obey speed limits (nonviolators) and those who claimed not to (violators) shows that the latter gave significantly lower ratings to all types of signing and were generally less restricted by roadway elements in choosing their speed. Factor analysis of the data indicates that speed choice on curves can be described by four road-environment factors: separation of opposing traffic; cross-section characteristics; alignment; and signing. Separate analyses show that nonviolators are primarily influenced by the signing factor in choosing their speed on curves, while violators' speed is chiefly determined by the road-layout factor. These findings suggest that speed reduction, where necessary, could be brought about by provision of reliable signing as well as safe and consistent low-speed alignment. The four factors identified by the analysis correspond to the findings of driver-behavior studies, indicating that attitude surveys can be used as a reliable aid in forming and evaluating relevant policies, whether at a local or a strategic level.

[1]  J Mclean DRIVER SPEED BEHAVIOUR AND RURAL ROAD ALIGNMENT DESIGN , 1981 .

[2]  F. McKenna,et al.  Factors underlying illusory self-assessment of driving skill in males and females. , 1991, Accident Analysis and Prevention.

[3]  John Mclean An alternative to the design speed concept for low speed alinement design , 1978 .

[4]  Gary E Elkins,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF LIMITING VELOCITY MODELS FOR THE HIGHWAY PERFORMANCE MONITORING SYSTEM (ABRIDGMENT) , 1988 .

[5]  A Taragin,et al.  DRIVER PERFORMANCE ON HORIZONTAL CURVES , 1954 .

[6]  Peter Collett,et al.  Driving Passion: The Psychology of the Car , 1987 .

[7]  K Noguchi,et al.  In search of "optimum" speed: from the user's viewpoint , 1990 .

[8]  Ruediger Lamm,et al.  POSSIBLE DESIGN PROCEDURE TO PROMOTE DESIGN CONSISTENCY IN HIGHWAY GEOMETRIC DESIGN ON TWO-LANE RURAL ROADS , 1988 .

[9]  I Dimitropoulos,et al.  SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE EVALUATION OF RISK ON ROADWAY CURVES , 1994 .

[10]  John Golias,et al.  A survey of drivers' attitudes toward speed limit violations , 1995 .

[11]  G Mintsis SPEED DISTRIBUTIONS ON ROAD CURVES , 1988 .

[12]  Ruediger Lamm,et al.  RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EVALUATING HORIZONTAL DESIGN CONSISTENCY BASED ON INVESTIGATIONS IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK , 1987 .

[13]  Andrew Richard Hale SAFETY AND SPEED: A SYSTEMS VIEW OF DETERMINANTS AND CONTROL MEASURES , 1990 .

[14]  Sam Yagar,et al.  Geometric and environmental effects on speeds of 2-lane highways , 1983 .

[15]  K S Rutley ADVISORY SPEED SIGNS FOR BENDS , 1972 .

[16]  Tim Neuman,et al.  ANALYSIS OF VEHICLE OPERATIONS ON HORIZONTAL CURVES , 1991 .

[17]  Edythe Traylor Crump 55 : a decade of experience , 1984 .

[18]  C C Wright,et al.  ROAD ACCIDENT CAUSATION & ENGINEERING TREATMENT: A REVIEW OF SOME CURRENT ISSUES , 1987 .

[19]  John Golias,et al.  Driver's speed behaviour on rural road curves , 1990 .

[20]  W. W. Daniel Applied Nonparametric Statistics , 1979 .