Upper limb rehabilitation after spinal cord injury: a treatment based on a data glove and an immersive virtual reality environment

Abstract Purpose state: The aim of this preliminary study was to test a data glove, CyberTouch™, combined with a virtual reality (VR) environment, for using in therapeutic training of reaching movements after spinal cord injury (SCI). Method: Nine patients with thoracic SCI were selected to perform a pilot study by comparing two treatments: patients in the intervention group (IG) conducted a VR training based on the use of a data glove, CyberTouch™ for 2 weeks, while patients in the control group (CG) only underwent the traditional rehabilitation. Furthermore, two functional parameters were implemented in order to assess patient’s performance of the sessions: normalized trajectory lengths and repeatability. Results: Although no statistical significance was found, the data glove group seemed to obtain clinical changes in the muscle balance (MB) and functional parameters, and in the dexterity, coordination and fine grip tests. Moreover, every patient showed variations in at least one of the functional parameters, either along Y-axis trajectory or Z-axis trajectory. Conclusions: This study might be a step forward for the investigation of new uses of motion capture systems in neurorehabilitation, making it possible to train activities of daily living (ADLs) in motivational environments while measuring objectively the patient’s functional evolution. Implications for Rehabilitation Key findings: A motion capture application based on a data glove is presented, for being used as a virtual reality tool for rehabilitation. This application has provided objective data about patient’s functional performance. What the study has added: (1) This study allows to open new areas of research based on the use of different motion capture systems as rehabilitation tools, making it possible to train Activities of Daily Living in motivational environments. (2) Furthermore, this study could be a contribution for the development of clinical protocols to identify which types of patients will benefit most from the VR treatments, which interfaces are more suitable to be used in neurorehabilitation, and what types of virtual exercises will work best.

[1]  Thierry Keller,et al.  Modular transcutaneous functional electrical stimulation system. , 2005, Medical engineering & physics.

[2]  W. Donovan,et al.  International Standards For Neurological Classification Of Spinal Cord Injury , 2003, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[3]  L. Lucca.  Virtual reality and motor rehabilitation of the upper limb after stroke: a generation of progress? , 2009, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[4]  I Gelernter,et al.  The Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) version III: Reliability and validity in a multi-center international study , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation.

[5]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  Peter T. L. Popkowski Leszczyc,et al.  The university of alberta. , 1969, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[7]  G.C. Burdea,et al.  Virtual reality-enhanced stroke rehabilitation , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[8]  Maureen K. Holden,et al.  Virtual Environments for Motor Rehabilitation: Review , 2005, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[9]  Ángel Gil-Agudo,et al.  Kinematic Metrics Based on the Virtual Reality System Toyra as an Assessment of the Upper Limb Rehabilitation in People with Spinal Cord Injury , 2014, BioMed research international.

[10]  M. Beninato,et al.  Relationship between motor FIM and muscle strength in lower cervical-level spinal cord injuries , 2004, Spinal Cord.

[11]  J. Wyndaele,et al.  Incidence, prevalence and epidemiology of spinal cord injury: what learns a worldwide literature survey? , 2006, Spinal Cord.

[12]  Paul F. M. J. Verschure,et al.  Interactive visuo-motor therapy system for stroke rehabilitation , 2007, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[13]  Robert Riener,et al.  ARMin III --arm therapy exoskeleton with an ergonomic shoulder actuation , 2009 .

[14]  M. Cameirão,et al.  Virtual reality based upper extremity rehabilitation following stroke: a review , 2008 .

[15]  F. I. Mahonery.  Functional evaluation : Barthel index , 1965 .

[16]  V. Dietz,et al.  Functional electrical stimulation for grasping and walking: indications and limitations , 2001, Spinal Cord.

[17]  Steven Kirshblum,et al.  International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury, revised 2011. , 2012, Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

[18]  Zhang Tong,et al.  Virtual Reality in Neurorehabilitation , 2016 .

[19]  Patrice L. Weiss,et al.  Textbook of Neural Repair and Rehabilitation: Virtual reality in neurorehabilitation , 2006 .

[20]  Silvano Mior,et al.  Muscle Testing, Techniques of Manual Examination , 1985 .

[21]  Derek G. Kamper,et al.  Use of a pneumatic glove for hand rehabilitation following stroke , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[22]  Enio Walker Azevedo Cacho,et al.  Upper limb assessment in tetraplegia: clinical, functional and kinematic correlations , 2011, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[23]  R. H. Jebsen,et al.  An objective and standardized test of hand function. , 1969, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[24]  H. Dickson,et al.  SCIM–Spinal Cord Independence Measure: a new disability scale for patients with spinal cord lesions , 1998, Spinal Cord.

[25]  F. Mahoney,et al.  FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. , 2018, Maryland state medical journal.

[26]  N. Silberberg,et al.  Hand strength and dexterity. , 1971, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[27]  Robert V Kenyon,et al.  A Pneumatic Glove and Immersive Virtual Reality Environment for Hand Rehabilitative Training After Stroke , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[28]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Automating Arm Movement Training Following Severe Stroke: Functional Exercises With Quantitative Feedback in a Gravity-Reduced Environment , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[29]  A. Behrman,et al.  Practice as an intervention to improve speeded motor performance and motor learning in Parkinson’s disease , 2000, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[30]  Silvestro Micera,et al.  A Simple Robotic System for Neurorehabilitation , 2005, Auton. Robots.

[31]  Ángel Gil-Agudo,et al.  [Application of virtual reality in the motor aspects of neurorehabilitation]. , 2010, Revista de neurologia.