Performance Bounds for Multisource Parameter Estimation Using a Multiarray Network

Networked sensors are increasingly being used to perform tasks such as detection, source localization, and tracking. It is intuitive to expect a performance increase by completing these tasks with networked arrays. Quantifying the increase in performance requires a generalized analysis, which is typically done using the Cramer-Rao bounds (CRB). Previously, the CRB for multisource-single-array and multiarray-single-source models were derived, but not the general multiarray-multisource case. In this paper, the general case is modeled and is shown to reduce to previously published cases. The model and CRB derived in this paper serve as a benchmark to which current and future research in multiarray, multisource parameter estimation algorithms can be compared. It is proven that the CRB of a scalar parameter in a model containing K + 1 sources is always higher than the CRB of K sources. In addition, using numerical analysis, it is shown that adding sources to a multiarray model has unique effects that cannot be predicted from less general models. The number of sources and sensors, the geometry of the model (i.e., source and sensor locations), and the source and noise power levels all affect the CRB. The effect of changing model parameters is shown for several multiarray-multisource examples when the estimated parameter is source location.

[1]  Boaz Porat,et al.  Some Bounds on the Resolution of Multiple Sources in Passive Systems , 1983, 1983 American Control Conference.

[2]  Harry L. Van Trees,et al.  Optimum Array Processing: Part IV of Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory , 2002 .

[3]  E. Weinstein,et al.  Decentralization of the Gaussian maximum likelihood estimator and its applications to passive array processing , 1981 .

[4]  Brian M. Sadler,et al.  Source localization with distributed sensor arrays and partial spatial coherence , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[5]  Huimin Chen,et al.  Tracking of multiple moving speakers with multiple microphone arrays , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing.

[6]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Coherent acoustic array processing and localization on wireless sensor networks , 2003, Proc. IEEE.

[7]  P. Whittle The Analysis of Multiple Stationary Time Series , 1953 .

[8]  Marius Pesavento,et al.  Direction finding in partly calibrated sensor arrays composed of multiple subarrays , 2002, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[9]  Daniel R. Fuhrmann,et al.  Generalizing MUSIC and MVDR for multiple noncoherent arrays , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[10]  G. Carter Coherence and time delay estimation , 1987, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[11]  Benjamin Friedlander,et al.  Analysis of the asymptotic relative efficiency of the MUSIC algorithm , 1988, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[12]  Benjamin Friedlander,et al.  On the Cramer-Rao bound for time delay and Doppler estimation , 1984, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[13]  Mostafa Kaveh,et al.  The statistical performance of the MUSIC and the minimum-norm algorithms in resolving plane waves in noise , 1986, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[14]  Petre Stoica,et al.  MUSIC, maximum likelihood, and Cramer-Rao bound , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[15]  Fuzhen Zhang Matrix Theory: Basic Results and Techniques , 1999 .

[16]  Monson H. Hayes,et al.  Statistical Digital Signal Processing and Modeling , 1996 .

[17]  Kung Yao,et al.  Source localization and beamforming , 2002, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[18]  Harry L. Van Trees,et al.  Optimum Array Processing , 2002 .

[19]  Petre Stoica,et al.  MUSIC, maximum likelihood, and Cramer-Rao bound: further results and comparisons , 1990, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[20]  Thomas Kailath,et al.  Decentralized processing in sensor arrays , 1985, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..