Interfering neighbours: The impact of novel word learning on the identification of visually similar words

We assessed the impact of visual similarity on written word identification by having participants learn new words (e.g. BANARA) that were neighbours of familiar words that previously had no neighbours (e.g. BANANA). Repeated exposure to these new words made it more difficult to semantically categorize the familiar words. There was some evidence of interference following an initial training phase, and clear evidence of interference the following day (without any additional training); interference was larger still following more training on the second day. These findings lend support to models of reading that include lexical competition as a key process.

[1]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  The time course of spoken word learning and recognition: studies with artificial lexicons. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[2]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  The effects of age-of-acquisition and frequency-of-occurrence in visual word recognition: Further evidence from the Dutch language , 2000 .

[3]  Kenneth I. Forster,et al.  No enemies in the neighborhood: absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  Paul D. Siakaluk,et al.  Orthographic neighborhood effects in lexical decision: the effects of nonword orthographic neighborhood size. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  C. Davis,et al.  More words in the neighborhood: Interference in lexical decision due to deletion neighbors , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  Kenneth I Forster,et al.  DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[7]  A. Cutler.  Making up materials is a confounded nuisance, or: Will we able to run any psycholinguistic experiments at all in 1990? , 1981, Cognition.

[8]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Transposed-Letter Confusability Effects in Masked Form Priming , 2003 .

[9]  S. Lupker,et al.  Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[10]  J. Grainger,et al.  Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: effects of relative prime-target frequency. , 1990 .

[11]  D. Zagar,et al.  When WORDS with Higher-frequency Neighbours Become Words with No Higher-frequency Neighbour (Or How to Undress the Neighbourhood Frequency Effect) , 2000 .

[12]  S. Andrews.  The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts , 1997 .

[13]  L. Katz,et al.  Evidence of flexible coding in visual word recognition. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  M. Gaskell,et al.  Lexical competition and the acquisition of novel words , 2003, Cognition.

[15]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[16]  J. Bowers,et al.  Automatic semantic activation of embedded words: Is there a hat in that? , 2005 .

[17]  Conrad Perry,et al.  No more problems in Coltheart's neighborhood: resolving neighborhood conflicts in the lexical decision task , 1998, Cognition.

[18]  Sachiko Kinoshita,et al.  Masked priming : the state of the art , 2003 .

[19]  J Grainger,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. , 1996, Psychological review.

[20]  A. Jacobs,et al.  On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  Manuel Perea,et al.  The effects of orthographic neighborhood in reading and laboratory word identification tasks: A review , 2000 .

[22]  Colin J. Davis,et al.  The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. , 2001 .

[23]  S. Liversedge,et al.  Neighborhood Effects Using a Partial Priming Methodology: Guessing or Activation? , 1998 .

[24]  K I Forster,et al.  The prime lexicality effect: form-priming as a function of prime awareness, lexical status, and discrimination difficulty. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Neighborhood-frequency effects when primes and targets are of different lengths , 2000, Psychological research.

[26]  S. Lupker,et al.  Masked inhibitory priming in english: evidence for lexical inhibition. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  Joël Pynte,et al.  Reading as a Perceptual Process , 2000 .

[28]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of word recognition and recall: attentional priming, learning, and resonance. , 1986 .

[29]  Colin J. Davis,et al.  Factors underlying masked priming effects in competitive network models of visual word recognition , 2003 .

[30]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[31]  J. Grainger,et al.  Masked morphological priming in visual word recognition. , 1991 .

[32]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and Performance VI , 1978 .

[33]  S. Lupker,et al.  Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions ☆ , 2004 .