A New Method for Brain Death Diagnosis Based on Phase Synchronization Analysis With EEG

Although brain death has been accepted by most countries, how to diagnose brain death quickly and accurately is still a very challenging task. Electroencephalography (EEG) is considered to be one of the most effective methods for clinically diagnosing the brain state. In the present study, we investigated if it is possible to find a robust neuro-marker to help doctors diagnose brain death from the perspective of brain information interaction. With 6-channel EEG data collected from prefrontal lobe of 30 patients (deep coma: 13, brain death 17), PLV was used to measure the phase synchronization and quantify the interaction between brain regions. Firstly, we found that there exists significant difference in brain synchronization between brain death patients and deep coma patients. Then, an interesting phenomenon was observed. In all the three low frequency bands (delta, theta, alpha), synchronization between the left hemisphere and the right hemisphere (IHPS) is significantly stronger than that only in left (LHPS) or right hemisphere (RHPS) for deep coma patients. However, this phenomenon has not been found in high frequency bands (beta and gamma) and for brain death patients. More importantly, it was verified for almost every patient (only 1 exception). This phenomenon might provide a robust neuro-marker for brain death diagnosis. Finally, we tried to distinguish between brain death and brain coma by monitoring brain synchronization in real time. The results also show the effectiveness and accuracy of our method. The method proposed in this paper can not only provide doctors with more stable and effective information, but also hope to develop a new visualization tool to assist brain death diagnosis.

[1]  Danilo P. Mandic,et al.  Data Fusion via Fission for the Analysis of Brain Death , 2010 .

[2]  David L McArthur,et al.  Cortical synchrony changes detected by scalp electrode electroencephalograph as traumatic brain injury patients emerge from coma. , 2007, Surgical neurology.

[3]  Shanbao Tong,et al.  Phase synchronization analysis of EEG signals: an evaluation based on surrogate tests. , 2012, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[4]  F. David Peat,et al.  Turbulent Mirror: An Illustrated Guide to Chaos Theory and the Science of Wholeness , 1989 .

[5]  Jianting Cao,et al.  Comparison of EMD, MEMD and 2T-EMD by analyzing standard artificial signals and EEG , 2017, 2017 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN).

[6]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Predicting Outcome in Comatose Patients: The Role of EEG Reactivity to Quantifiable Electrical Stimuli , 2016, Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM.

[7]  Kaspar Anton Schindler,et al.  Prognostic and diagnostic value of EEG signal coupling measures in coma , 2016, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[8]  R Quian Quiroga,et al.  Performance of different synchronization measures in real data: a case study on electroencephalographic signals. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[9]  Jose M Hurtado,et al.  Statistical method for detection of phase-locking episodes in neural oscillations. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  W. Szurhaj,et al.  EEG guidelines in the diagnosis of brain death , 2015, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[11]  A definition of irreversible coma. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death. , 1968, JAMA.

[12]  Zhe Chen,et al.  An Empirical Quantitative EEG Analysis for Evaluating Clinical Brain Death , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[13]  Yann LeCun,et al.  Classification of patterns of EEG synchronization for seizure prediction , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Analysing Synchronization Phenomena from Bivariate Data by Means of the Hilbert Transform , 1998 .