A loss-based control algorithm for magnetorheological dampers combined with earthquake early warning

This paper presents a methodology that combines the use of magnetorheological (MR) dampers together wi th an earthquake early warning (EEW) system to minimize the losses i n a structure about to be struck by an incoming gro und motion. MR dampers can generate relatively large controllable damping forces by tuning the viscosity of an MR flu id through a control voltage. Their mechanical simplicity, fast response time, and low electric power requirements make the m attractive for potential applications in earthquake engineering, p articularly when combined with EEW. In this paper, a control algorithm is developed to etermine the command voltage of the MR damper base d on the expected ground shaking predicted by an EEW system. A genera l framework is introduced that develops a performan ce-based (i.e., loss-based) control algorithm for semi-active devic s ombined with an EEW system. A simplified storybased buildingspecific component-based loss estimation is used in the proposed framework, combining real-time, EEW-b ased seismic hazard, nonlinear dynamic structural simulation, da mage fragility and loss. For illustrative purposes, the control algorithm is implemented on a generic three-story building struc ture equipped with a small-scale MR damper prototyp e. Results reveal that the developed EEW-based control alg rithm can effectively reduce the expected loss of the considered case-study structure.

[1]  Antonio Occhiuzzi,et al.  Experimental analysis of magnetorheological dampers for structural control , 2003 .

[2]  Gaetano Manfredi,et al.  Prediction of response spectra via real-time earthquake measurements , 2008 .

[3]  T. T. Soong,et al.  Supplemental energy dissipation: state-of-the-art and state-of-the- practice , 2002 .

[4]  B. Sp,et al.  State of the Art of Structural Control , 2003 .

[5]  Iunio Iervolino,et al.  Performance-based earthquake early warning , 2011 .

[6]  Carlos Marcelo Ramirez Building-specific loss estimation methods & tools for simplified performance-based earthquake engineering , 2009 .

[7]  Roberto Paolucci,et al.  Ground Motion Record Selection Based on Broadband Spectral Compatibility , 2014 .

[8]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Semiactive Control Strategies for MR Dampers: Comparative Study , 2000 .

[9]  Steven R. Winterstein,et al.  Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of controlled steel moment‐resisting frame structures , 2002 .

[10]  J. Baker,et al.  An Introduction to Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (PSHA) , 2008 .

[11]  Curt B. Haselton,et al.  Assessing seismic collapse safety of modern reinforced concrete moment frame buildings , 2006 .

[12]  Giuseppe Maddaloni,et al.  Use of seismic early warning information to calibrate variable dampers for structural control of a highway bridge: evaluation of the system robustness , 2013, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[13]  Gaetano Festa,et al.  Source Characterization for Earthquake Early Warning , 2014 .

[14]  Gaetano Manfredi,et al.  Uncertainty in early warning predictions of engineering ground motion parameters : What really matters? , 2009 .

[15]  Wei-Hsin Liao,et al.  Magnetorheological fluid dampers: a review of parametric modelling , 2011 .

[16]  Gaetano Manfredi,et al.  Expected loss‐based alarm threshold set for earthquake early warning systems , 2007 .

[17]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Modeling of a large‐scale magneto‐rheological damper for seismic hazard mitigation. Part II: Semi‐active mode , 2013 .

[18]  Fatemeh Jalayer,et al.  Alternative non‐linear demand estimation methods for probability‐based seismic assessments , 2009 .

[19]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Modeling and Control of Magnetorheological Dampers for Seismic Response Reduction , 1996 .