Effect of Size and Mission Requirements on the Design Optimization of Non-Planar Aircraft Configurations

Significant performance improvements can be achieved by aircraft configurations which make use of non–planar lifting surface arrangements to improved aerodynamic efficiency, reduced structural weight, and tailored flight dynamics and control characteristics. Potential improvements come at the price of a larger degree of inter–disciplinary couplings where non–aerodynamic considerations such as structural strength and weight characteristics need to be included in the overall design process. Furthermore, the effect that aircraft size, its mission, and its operational requirements have in these type of configurations need to be assessed. In this paper, we explore the multidisciplinary design and optimization of non–planar configurations, taking into account the coupling between aerodynamics and structures for different aircraft sizes and mission requirements. A very flexible representation of non–planar configurations is allowed and geometric, volumetric, aerodynamic, and structural characteristics are considered. Results show the performace effects and inter– disciplinary trade–offs that size and mission requirements impose on the design of these types of aircraft configurations.

[1]  Riccardo Poli,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 1995, Swarm Intelligence.

[2]  J. S. Przemieniecki.  Theory of matrix structural analysis , 1985 .

[3]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Advanced configurations for very large transport airplanes , 1998 .

[4]  Russell C. Eberhart,et al.  A new optimizer using particle swarm theory , 1995, MHS'95. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science.

[5]  P. J. Gage,et al.  New approaches to optimization in aerospace conceptual design , 1995 .

[6]  Prabhat Hajela,et al.  Preliminary weight estimation of conventional and joined wings usingequivalent beam models , 1988 .

[7]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  A General Approach to Multiple Lifting Surface Design and Analysis , 1984 .

[8]  Richard T. Whitcomb,et al.  A design approach and selected wind tunnel results at high subsonic speeds for wing-tip mounted winglets , 1976 .

[9]  J. Wolkovitch,et al.  The joined wing - An overview , 1985 .

[10]  J. Katz,et al.  Low-Speed Aerodynamics , 1991 .

[11]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Aero-Structural Optimization of Non-Planar Lifting Surface Configurations , 2008 .

[12]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Tip Extensions, Winglets, and C-wings: Conceptual Design and Optimization , 2008 .

[13]  J. E. Allen,et al.  The use of wing tip sails to reduce vortex drag , 1977, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[14]  G. R. Inger.  Application of Oswatitsch's theorem to supercritical airfoil drag calculation , 1991 .

[15]  William H. Mason,et al.  Analytic models for technology integration in aircraft design , 1990 .

[16]  H. Oertel.  Prandtl's essentials of fluid mechanics , 2004 .

[17]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Aerostructural Optimization of Nonplanar Lifting Surfaces , 2010 .

[18]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  pyACDT: An Object-Oriented Framework for Aircraft Design Modelling and Multidisciplinary Optimization , 2008 .

[19]  James Kennedy,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 2002, Proceedings of ICNN'95 - International Conference on Neural Networks.

[20]  Jakob Kuttenkeuler,et al.  Aeroelastic Design Optimization with Experimental Verification , 1998 .

[21]  Kamran Behdinan,et al.  Particle swarm approach for structural design optimization , 2007 .

[22]  Edward N. Tinoco,et al.  Thirty Years of Development and Application of CFD at Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Seattle , 2003 .

[23]  John E. Terry.  AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF RING WINGS, A BIBLIOGRAPHY , 1964 .

[24]  Manoj Kumar Tiwari,et al.  Swarm Intelligence, Focus on Ant and Particle Swarm Optimization , 2007 .