Effects of a flexible boundary on hydrodynamic stability

The theoretical study presented in this paper was inspired by the recent report (Kramer 1960) of experiments showing that considerable reductions in the drag of an underwater solid body were achieved by covering it with a skin of flexible material; apparently this effect was due to the boundary layer being stabilized in the presence of the skin, so that transition to a turbulent condition of flow was prevented or at least delayed. The stability problem for flow past a flexible boundary is here formulated in a general way which allows a full exploration of the possibility of a stabilizing effect without the need to assign specific properties to the flexible medium; the collective properties of possible boundaries are represented by a ‘response coefficient’ α (a sort of ‘effective compliance’) measuring the deflexion of the surface under a travelling sinusoidal distribution of pressure. A remarkably simple analytical connexion is established between the present general problem and the corresponding stability problem for the boundary layer on a rigid plane wall, and hence many details of the existing theory of hydrodynamic stability are immediately useful. However, the presence of the flexible boundary admits possible modes of instability additional to those which already exist when the boundary is rigid, and clearly every mode must be considered with regard to practical measures for stabilization—that is to say, it might be useless to inhibit one mode by a device which lets in another. What is believed to be an essentially complete interpretation of the over-all possibilities is deduced on recognizing three more or less distinct forms of instability. The first comprises waves resembling the unstable waves which can arise in the presence of a rigid boundary, but now being modified by the effects of flexibility. These waves tend to be stabilized when the boundary has a compliant response to them, which means the respective wave velocity has to be less than the velocity of free surface waves on the boundary; but it is found that the effect of internal friction in the flexible medium is actually de stabilizing. The second form of instability is essentially a resonance effect and comprises waves travelling at very nearly the velocity of free surface waves. These waves can only be excited when the latter velocity falls below the free-stream velocity; they are scarcely affected by the viscosity of the fluid since the ‘wall friction layer’ is largely cancelled, so that damping due to the medium itself becomes the only stabilizing factor. The third form is akin to Kelvin–Helmholtz instability. This interpretation of the theoretical results seems to point to the essential factors in the operation of a flexible skin as a stabilizing device, and accordingly in the concluding secttion of the paper two alternative sets of criteria are proposed each of which would provide a logical basis for designing such a device. The principle of the first alternative explains the success of Gamer's invention, but the second appears equally promising and the relative advantages of the two can really be proved only by further experiment.