Review and evaluation of interchange ramp design considerations for facilities without frontage roads

Ramps in non-frontage-road settings are more complicated to design than those in frontage-road settings for several reasons. Adequate ramp length, appropriate horizontal and vertical curvature, and flaring to increase storage area at the crossroad intersection should all be used to design safe and efficient ramps for non-frontage-road settings. However, current design procedures available in standard Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) reference documents are focused on ramp design for frontage-road settings. The objective of this research project is to develop recommended design procedures for interchange ramps on facilities without frontage roads. This report describes the findings from the first year of a two-year project. Current ramp design practices were reviewed, and the operational features of interchange ramps in non-frontage-road settings were evaluated. Both the diamond and partial cloverleaf interchange forms were considered. The findings from the evaluation of the field and simulation data indicate that a rational approach to interchange type selection and operational evaluation is feasible using the critical movement analysis approach.

[1]  Michael D Fontaine,et al.  GUIDELINES FOR PRELIMINARY SELECTION OF THE OPTIMUM INTERCHANGE TYPE FOR A SPECIFIC LOCATION , 1999 .

[2]  L King,et al.  THE NEW AASHTO METRIC POLICY ON GEOMETRIC DESIGN OF HIGHWAYS AND STREETS , 1995 .

[3]  Carroll J. Messer,et al.  Phase Capacity Characteristics for Signalized Interchange and Intersection Approaches , 1998 .

[4]  Frank J Koepke.  RAMP EXIT/ENTRANCE DESIGN--TAPER VERSUS PARALLEL AND CRITICAL DIMENSIONS , 1993 .

[5]  J. A. Cirillo,et al.  ANALYSIS AND MODELING OF RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN ACCIDENTS AND THE GEOMETRIC AND TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE INTERSTATE SYSTEM , 1969 .

[6]  W F McFarland,et al.  SINGLE POINT URBAN INTERCHANGE DESIGN AND OPERATIONS ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[7]  N J Garber,et al.  COMPARISON OF THE OPERATIONAL AND SAFETY CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SINGLE POINT URBAN AND DIAMOND INTERCHANGES , 1996 .

[8]  Mark A Marek,et al.  INTERCHANGE STUDY AND SELECTION PROCESS , 1993 .

[9]  F. Webster.  TRAFFIC SIGNAL SETTINGS , 1958 .

[10]  Timothy J Lomax,et al.  GEOMETRIC DESIGN OF METERED ENTRANCE AND HIGH-OCCUPANCY VEHICLE BYPASS RAMPS , 1993 .

[11]  Joel P Leisch.  OPERATIONAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR SYSTEMS OF INTERCHANGES , 1993 .

[12]  黒田 孝次,et al.  Highway Capacity Manual改訂の動向--テイラ-教授の講演より , 1984 .

[13]  James A Bonneson,et al.  Technique for Comparing Operation of Alternative Interchange Types , 2002 .

[14]  John C Hayward,et al.  SAFETY EFFECTIVENESS OF HIGHWAY DESIGN FEATURES. VOLUME IV: INTERCHANGES , 1992 .

[15]  A H Parham,et al.  PROCEDURES TO DETERMINE FRONTAGE ROAD LEVEL OF SERVICE AND RAMP SPACING , 1996 .

[16]  Y Zhang,et al.  MODELING INTERSECTION CONTROL DELAY IN CORSIM , 2000 .

[17]  J E Leisch.  CAPACITY ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES FOR DESIGN OF SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS - INSTALLMENT NO 2 PART IV - HIGH TYPE FACILITIES AND INTERCHANGES , 1967 .

[18]  J A Bonneson,et al.  ACTUATED CONTROLLER SETTINGS FOR THE DIAMOND INTERCHANGE WITH THREE-PHASE OPERATION , 2000 .

[19]  Douglas W Harwood,et al.  RAMP/MAINLINE SPEED RELATIONSHIPS AND DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS , 1993 .

[20]  Karin M Bauer,et al.  STATISTICAL MODELS OF ACCIDENTS ON INTERCHANGE RAMPS AND SPEED-CHANGE LANES , 1998 .

[21]  T R Neuman.  Intersection Channelization Design Guide , 1985 .

[22]  Ross J Walker.  TWO-LANE LOOP RAMPS: OPERATION AND DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS , 1993 .

[23]  J A Keller.  INTERCHANGE RAMP GEOMETRICS--ALIGNMENT AND SUPERELEVATION DESIGN , 1993 .

[24]  Michael Hunter,et al.  REEVALUATION OF RAMP DESIGN SPEED CRITERIA , 1999 .